It is said that the Xia Dynasty was actually ancient Egypt. How to refute this statement?

1. From a linguistic point of view, Xia and Shang Dynasties have nothing to do with ancient Egypt. According to this, it is generally judged that ancient Egypt and Xia Shang developed independently, and even the ancient Mesopotamian civilization closest to ancient Egypt developed independently. Although Akkadian in ancient Mesopotamia had something to do with ancient Egyptian, Sumerian, another major language, had nothing to do with ancient Egyptian. Ancient Egypt could not even influence Mesopotamia, how could it influence Xia and Shang Dynasties?

2. Xia Shang developed from the Neolithic culture in China. From the perspective of the evolution of artifacts, there is a strong correlation between Neolithic culture and Xia Shang culture; From an agricultural point of view, we don't look at artificial products. The agricultural model represented by millet, millet, rice, pig, dog and silkworm also came down in one continuous line from Neolithic culture in China to Xia and Shang Dynasties. Sheep and wagons are foreign, but not from Egypt, but from Mesopotamia.

3. From a deeper artistic and philosophical point of view, ancient Egypt is completely different from Xia and Shang Dynasties. It is easy to find a description of Pharaoh from Egyptian art, but it is difficult to find a description of the king from Xia and Shang art-Xia and Shang art expressed ancestor worship with bronzes and complex abstract ornamentation, and the two cultures are different on the artistic basis; The ultimate philosophical concept of ancient Egypt is eternity-either eternal or eternal in the cycle of life and death. However, Xia and Shang culture did not highlight this concept, but used divination to find the law of events (although inaccurate, it can be attributed to divination or the concept of Yijing). This reaction of art and philosophy is difficult to find the same point in the higher thinking activities at that time. How can you say that they are too close?

4. Actually, the history of Xia and Shang Dynasties in Historical Records is not single. There are great differences between the chronology of ancient bamboo books and historical records, at least on the key issues such as Yao Shun's succession to the throne, whether Yu abdicated or passed on his son, whether Tai Jia killed Yi Yin, and whether Wen Ding killed Li. This diversification shows that the construction of Xia and Shang history is necessarily diversified, not imported from abroad, and history is also a part of culture. Moreover, the primitive historical era of Xia and Shang dynasties must be combined with historical materials and physical evidence. Only relying on YY's old historical knowledge, we can only draw absurd conclusions.

5. A basic logic of archaeology is that relevance and similarity don't represent causality, and the similarity between Oracle Bone Inscriptions and hieroglyphics can't explain the relationship between them without evidence of the propagation process.