Is it accurate to tell fortune with the palace of life _ How to tell fortune with the palace of life?

Is the eight-character fortune telling accurate?

What is science? It is a tool for human beings to know the world, but it is not necessarily the only tool. The characteristic of science is empiricism, and hypotheses, experiments, hypotheses and experiments can all be proved. This is the so-called scientific theory. In other words, a theory can only be said to be scientific if it is confirmed or falsified, that is, science must be empirical, confirmed or falsified.

However, China culture is "metaphysical" rather than "empirical". Science cannot deny what is imagined. Today's science has not reached the peak of understanding the universe. Science is constantly denying previous theories, and science is even teetering. How can we deny the theory that is beyond our scope? I'm afraid it's not a scientific attitude to flatly deny and deny without foundation.

Others replied: If fortune telling is true, then why do fortune tellers rely on fortune telling for a living? Please note that fortune telling is fortune telling, and changing life is changing life, which are two different things. His answers to this question are inconsistent. In other words, fortune tellers can tell fortune, but they can't completely subvert fate. He denied possible fortune-telling with an impossible life change.

Ma Zhe told people that in order to realize the unity of objective laws and subjective initiative, since we recognize the influence of objective laws on the whole mankind, why not deny the influence of objective laws on individuals? So why can't life be understood as the restriction of objective laws on individuals? Since matter determines consciousness, human consciousness cannot reverse this restriction, that is to say, life is an objective restriction, and human beings cannot reverse it with consciousness.

Finally, aside from the topic, it is no exaggeration to say "scientific teaching" in our society now. Why, science has even become our belief, because once we say that so-and-so is scientific, we will not pursue it or ask why, because it conforms to science, and science has even become synonymous with truth. In short, as long as it conforms to science, we think it is right.

Is that really the case?

Loyalty is not a negative idea, so I leave my humble opinion to the theme to think about.

Pure hands, you can ask.