Cool and I live crape myrtle

The anchorwoman imitated Wei Zi and became popular on the Internet. In addition to looking like Ruby Lin, the performance is also vivid, but although it is imitation, it is her own performance, but it is actually imitated by Ruby Lin's original song in Princess Pearl. In fact, the copyright should also belong to Ruby Lin.

First of all, the right to portrait belongs to Ruby Lin.

Although Ruby Lin only played Wei Zi, the image of Wei Zi was also shaped by Ruby Lin, and the script and lines were also arranged by the screenwriter and director. The behavior of the female anchor is indeed suspected of infringement. Her performance is also an imitation of Wei Zi. Ruby Lin's crying in the play is a classic, and Ruby Lin Jr. really won everyone's attention with this stunt, so the portrait right still belongs to the actor Ruby Lin. In many imitations, many anchors belittle or distort or grandstanding by any means, in fact, for the benefit. Maybe everyone thinks it's just imitation, but in fact, we find that many things have damaged the star's own portrait right to a certain extent, and now the issue of copyright has been paid more and more attention, but these phenomena can be considered as violations of the performer's right to protect the performance image from distortion.

Second, the law protects everyone's rights.

We know that according to Article 39 of the Copyright Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), performers have the right to protect their rights from being distorted by others. Therefore, if Ruby Lin imitates the female anchor inappropriately, or feels that her reputation is damaged, she has the right to claim her rights. Moreover, the live broadcast has brought a lot of profits to Ruby Lin, including many rewards from local tyrants. In fact, this is a business activity and benefits from it. If the original performer feels that his performance has been used for improper commercial activities, then the other party should bear the corresponding responsibility.

Imitation shows are very eye-catching, but don't imitate blindly regardless of the consequences. If it causes adverse effects, it will definitely be investigated for legal responsibility.