Does "carefree study" in Tao Te Ching mean "no worries without study"?

In many people's cognition, Taoism doesn't respect knowledge, and even Laozi said that "learning is carefree". "Juexue is speechless" is often understood as "there is no sorrow when you break your studies".

Why did Lao Tzu say such a thing? Since I have such a cognition, why should I be a person who has read a lot of poetry books? Why teach and educate people? What books do disciples write? From the simplest logic point of view, can it be considered that this is an act of inconsistency between words and deeds, that is, paradox, which is untenable?

I have probably read the modern translation of this passage, which is really vernacular, that is, literal translation: people can gain a hundred times of benefits by abandoning cleverness and ingenuity; Abandoning benevolence and righteousness can restore the nature of filial piety; Abandon cunning for profit, and thieves will be gone.

Sages, benevolent people and cleverness are all ingenious decorations, which are not enough to be used as the laws to control social diseases. Therefore, only by making people's thoughts and understanding belong, maintaining their pure and simple nature, reducing selfish desires and distractions, and abandoning the superficial prose of sages, wisdom and etiquette can we avoid pain.

According to later generations' understanding of Taoism and Confucianism, there is nothing wrong with this interpretation. After all, everyone agrees that these two schools are not difficult to deal with, so what do you think? This passage of Tao Te Ching is a refutation of Confucius' point of view. However, according to this line of thinking, there is nowhere to go for the chapter "Nothing to worry about".

To give up wisdom is to give up intelligence. In that case, why build a house and eat? Even the most basic survival is a big problem, what to talk about, what to talk about nature. Humanity is also a way, okay?

This explanation is completely against human nature, okay? Some people say that wisdom here refers to opportunism, but I think this explanation is a forced persistence. Even if it means speculation, who is the speculator? What machine did you throw? What's good for the people? It doesn't work here.