After 00, she was ridiculed as a 40-year-old girl. How to turn over the million-dollar online celebrity live broadcast?

Modern people's psychology has become morbid. When people say something that is not in line with reality, they call it "framing people". When they are slightly different from their usual selves, they say that they "rely on beauty." Once there is a certain contrast, they will expose their true situation and say that they have "overturned".

What I don't understand is, an anchor and an online celebrity, what do you praise her for? What's the point of your concern for her? After the so-called rollover, what kind of influence did it bring to yourself? It has become the norm for the anchor to open beauty. I blindly believe in the anchor's face value, reward or make it popular, and in turn blame the anchor?

Before I say this, let me ask you a few questions that hit the soul. Do you people who eat melons take pictures and turn on the filter? Open beauty? Do girls need makeup when they go out? I know what's wrong with taking photos, wearing beautiful filters and makeup, and being broadcast live? Moreover, these are the special effects provided by the platform. She didn't do anything shameful in this way, and I don't understand why many netizens spit.

Everyone loves beauty, and he can't be a vegetarian himself. On the other hand, he doesn't allow others to be beautiful. What logic is this?

People are not as good as the sky, and flowers are red. If I pay attention to her because of the face value in the video, then the present face value does not conform to my own aesthetic concept, so why not just take it off? What I can't understand is that this kind of thing can be openly regarded as hot news.

The live broadcast has been very popular in recent years. One of the top anchors is called one. Which one can't live without beauty? Which live broadcast cannot turn on the filter? If the beauty filter of online celebrities is regarded as a lie, isn't everyone lying? It's just that some people turn it up and some people turn it down. Obviously, I can't extricate myself from living in a virtual world, but finally I say that the anchor has overturned. Here, a phrase from Yao Ming is used to describe it: "If you don't buy or sell, there will be no killing". If you don't pay attention to others, what are their parents like, how big the gap is, and what does it have to do with you?

It is said that the self-proclaimed post-00 anchorwoman's name is Shi Ziyi, a native of Hubei, and she has millions of fans in Zhihu. In its live broadcast room, it may be because there is no makeup, and the beauty filter is not opened, revealing its true face. Many people say that she calls herself a 40-year-old aunt. Then the question is coming. Is she a 40-year-old aunt after 00? You should know that the anchor is from real-name registration system, and her relatives and friends must know her real age, but so far no one has come forward and claimed to know the truth. Is the conclusion really good under such circumstances? Some people's facial features are also quite different in some shots and angles. Is it really appropriate to say that an anchor is so direct?

I also saw those photos posted online. There are indeed some gaps through comparison, but is this caused by the face value? It is obviously caused by different shooting styles and angles. At least after I have seen two photos, I can be sure that it is the same person, not much better than some online celebrities. It's not that I like to be picky. Judging from the photos and live screenshots, the two photos do look 20 years apart, but so what? Isn't it normal for ordinary people to rest at home, travel, pose, meet customers and adjust their clothes because of different objects? In other words, even if she looks 40 years old, if she retakes it according to the dress in the photo and gets a little light and shadow, the gap is actually not that big.

This is my picture. Although the P-picture technology is not very good, if you change the heads of two people, the gap is still obvious, but at least you can see that it is the same person. Personally, I'm not a fan of her. I heard about her for the first time today, so there is no problem of whitewashing. Let me say something you don't like to hear. The foundation is there. It looks good after using beauty and filter. Really kowtowing with beauty filters and PS is not in line with your aesthetic concept. Besides, it's none of your business if people don't marry you. It is not good to eat melons silently. What does beauty and ugliness have to do with you?