How does the Son of God explain in Genesis?

Genesis 6: 1-4 tells us: "When more people in the world gave birth to daughters, the son of God saw the beauty of people's daughters and chose them at random and married them. The Lord said, since man is flesh and blood, my spirit will not live in him forever, but his days will last for one hundred and twenty years. There were many great men on the ground at that time. Later, the son of God had intercourse with a human daughter and gave birth to a child, which was a famous family in ancient times. "There are several theories about who is the son of God and why the children born to their female compatriots will become giants (that is, the word great man represents).

:{Fe"[Q6Oy0

U y l"nz, FK3i\0 There are three main views on the identification of "sons of God": (1) they are fallen angels, or (2) they are powerful human rulers, or (3) they are descendants of just Seth and evil Cain. The evidence of the first view is that the "son of God" in the Old Testament often refers to angels (Job1:6; 2: 1; 38:7)。 But the problem with this view is that Matthew 22: 30 says that angels don't get married. The Bible does not say that angels are sexual or fertile. The second and third views do not have this problem.

-w； Sg n#va ]6s`0 Wilderness Blog q) T-P _ X3c

The weakness of views 2 and 3 is that if ordinary human males marry ordinary human females, their descendants probably won't have "giants" or "ancient celebrities". Besides, if God never forbade powerful human males or descendants of Seth from marrying ordinary human females or descendants of Cain, why did God decide to flood the earth (Genesis 6: 5-7)? The verdict in Genesis 6: 5-7 is related to what happened in Genesis 6: 1-4. Only the lewd marriage between fallen angels and human women should be so severely punished.

]; Kfc}8O0 Wilderness Blog) RsCs, RPBa

Wilderness blog 4Lm7DsH*PBB

In my opinion, the first view is most in line with the situation at that time. Yes, it seems "contradictory" to say that angels have no gender, and that "the son of God" is fallen angels, who has children with human women. However, although angels are spirits (Hebrews 1: 14), they can appear in human form (Kyle 16: 5). People in Sodom and Gomorrah wanted to have sex with two angels in Lot's house (Genesis 19: 1-5). Angels can appear in human form and even have human sexual behavior or reproductive ability, which is an ambiguous statement. Why did fallen angels stop doing this later? It seems that God imprisoned fallen angels and they committed this evil crime, so other fallen angels won't do it again (Jude 6). Even the early Hebrew translators agreed with many apocryphal articles that the "son of God" in Genesis 6: 1-4 refers to a fallen angel. Of course, this does not quell the controversy. However, in Genesis 6: 1-4, fallen angels's view of intercourse with human women conforms to the causal relationship between context and grammar and has historical basis.