What's the difference between Fu Peirong and Ceng Shiqiang?

Ceng Shiqiang's academic research should not be as good as Fu Peirong's, but the actual experience is still very deep, which is estimated to be due to the accumulation of age to some extent. Although many words sound simple, the truth is profound. Fu Peirong studied philosophy, although he also studied China's philosophy, but the system is too complicated and not very in-depth, which is not as good as popularizing knowledge.

Mr Fu Peirong's lecture on the Book of Changes is very interesting. He graduated from Yale University. When he was a child, his family was poor. He has seven brothers and sisters. His mother was paralyzed in her early years. During his study abroad, he was once looked down upon by many classmates.

He shocked everyone with his actual performance. What impressed me most was that he said in his speech that a Jewish professor asked him to write a paper on religion in Japanese. Then it took him only a few months to write this 50-page paper, all in Japanese. But before that, he had never learned Japanese. This shows that Mr Fu Peirong is really a reading genius.

But one thing is strange. I found that he never talked about Buddhism.

Mr. Fu Peirong was a student of Mr. nan huaijin in college, which shows that he has also studied Buddhism.

The Book of Changes mentioned by Mr. Ceng Shiqiang is also very vivid and concise, and people without certain experience can't quite understand his meaning. I seldom talk about Buddhism.

Both of them are masters of Chinese studies.

As the saying goes, "there is specialization in the art", perhaps their main research focus is Confucianism and Taoism, and they don't have a deep study of Buddhism, so they don't express too many opinions. It's a little strange and a little pity.