The difference and connection between speculation and argumentation

Argumentative thinking refers to the way of thinking to understand things from the perspective of change and development, which is usually regarded as the opposite of logical thinking. In logical thinking, things are generally "either this or that" and "not true or false", while in speculative thinking, things can be "either this or that" and "both true and false" at the same time without hindering normal thinking activities. Dialectical thinking refers to a world outlook. Everything in the world is interrelated and influenced by each other, and dialectical thinking is a kind of thinking based on the objective relationship between all things in the world, to further understand and perceive the world, to feel the relationship between man and nature in the process of thinking, and to draw some conclusions. Dialectical thinking requires that when observing and analyzing problems, we should look at problems with a dynamic development perspective. Dialectical thinking is the application of materialist dialectics in thinking, and the categories, viewpoints and laws of materialist dialectics are completely applicable to dialectical thinking. Dialectical thinking is the reflection of objective dialectics in thinking, and the viewpoint of connection and development is also the basic viewpoint of dialectical thinking. The negation law of unity of opposites, mutual change of quality and negation is the basic law of materialist dialectics and dialectical thinking, that is, the thinking method of unity of opposites, mutual change of quality and negation of negation.