When talking about Nanda's dismembered case, Li Changyu said that without physical evidence, no amount of reasoning is useless.

As a famous criminal investigation expert in China, Li Changyu participated in the investigation of many major international cases. Everyone will be familiar with the detailed Nanda dismembered body case, because the cruelty of the murderer is simply outrageous, and it is said that the case has not been solved so far. What did Li Changyu say about Nanda's dismembered body case? What is the truth? Let's take a look at this website.

First of all, Li Changyu talked about the Nanda dismembered body case.

Speaking of the dismemberment of Nantah, it happened in 1995, which is a nightmare for all Nanjing University students. A classmate was killed and dismembered into more than 2,000 pieces. The real murderer is still at large, so some people say that if Li Changyu had come to investigate the dismemberment case of Nantah, the result might have been there long ago.

But what did Li Changyu say about Nanda's dismembered body case? According to people familiar with the matter, even Li Changyu could not solve the case that caused a sensation in China. In 2008, the news about Nanda's dismembered body case on the Internet has not been confirmed, and the truth of Nanda's dismembered body case has not been solved yet.

In addition, Li Changyu also said that the key lies in physical evidence, and it is meaningless to make logical inference without physical evidence. There is too little physical evidence in this case. It is said that there is dander on the sheets that wrap the body. If it is true, this should be the only breakthrough in this case. I have to say, the murderer is really cruel, much more cruel than the modus operandi in the Ma Jiajue incident.

But so far, there is still no progress in obtaining evidence about the Nanda dismembered body case, and the crime scene is a mess. There is no physical evidence to testify in court, let alone witness. Now, after many years, even if there is physical evidence, it is impossible to exist, so the murderer in this case has been at large. It's been 23 years. In fact, the time limit for litigation stipulated by national laws is 20 years, but the police announced that the investigation of this case will never stop. Previous 0 /2 Next Page