Whether opening a book is beneficial or not, refute it first and then prove it useless.

Students, our view remains the same, that is, "opening books is beneficial." Everyone is familiar with the famous saying of Du Fu, a poet in the Tang Dynasty: "Reading breaks thousands of books, and writing is like a god." Books are the crystallization of human wisdom, the summary of human historical experience and the reflection of social life. Reading can deeply understand the meaning of life, understand the vicissitudes of the world, benefit the people all over the world, and enter the hall of wisdom. Since ancient times, people who want to become talents and scholars who want to help the world must study. Only by reading a lot of books can you become a man. How can Party B say "reading is useless"?

Party b a:

We reminded male debaters not to confuse our views. When we say "opening books may not be beneficial", we don't mean not reading, but adopting the correct reading method. You just said "open book is beneficial". We can see that there are good books, bad books and even "poisonous books". How can you read it indiscriminately? Besides, those so-called comic books, such as Wulongyuan, The Journey to the West and Snow from Winter to Sun, seem to have a special appetite for our primary school students. You think, what should I do if I keep my eyes fixed, the content is unhealthy and my eyesight drops? Not to mention those books with bad tendencies such as love killing, fortune telling, and malicious teasing of historical figures, which have a very bad influence on us children, it is really better not to open them.

Party A and Party B:

The ancients said, "Eating without meat is better than living without bamboo." Bamboo is also an elegant person. In other words, we can eat no meat for one day and study for one day. Books are the nourishment of human spirit, which can make us strong and noble. Pay attention to eye hygiene and rest for half an hour. At the same time, as long as we pay attention to reading books in regular bookstores, we won't see books with unhealthy thoughts.

Party B:

We still can't accept each other's views. There are two reasons: first, the current bookstores are affected by the market economy and the competition is fierce. In order to make money, some unscrupulous booksellers do whatever it takes to adulterate some unhealthy books and even sell pornographic books. Second, our pupils are young and have weak self-control. When they see such a book, they can't stand the temptation and even forget to eat and sleep. Once hooked, you will be possessed, have no mind in class, and your grades will plummet. Some even imitate the characters in the book, so they embarked on the road of crime. Doesn't this confirm our view that "opening books is not necessarily beneficial" or even harmful?

Party A and Party C:

I want the facts to speak for themselves. At all times and in all countries, which effective person has not opened his book thousands of times? It is because of reading that they became famous and made great achievements. Confucius read thousands of books and edited poetry books. Sima Qian read thousands of books and wrote historical records. Li Bai read thousands of books and wrote hundreds of poems about fighting wine; Lu Xun and Guo Moruo read thousands of books and became masters of modern literature in China ... Gorky put it well: "Books are the ladder of human progress." It has become an ironclad fact that reading more books increases knowledge and makes people smart. The British philosopher Bacon famously said, "History lessons make people wise, poetry makes them wise, mathematics makes them careful, natural history makes them profound, and ethics makes them solemn." Many of these meanings can be summed up in one sentence: opening books is beneficial. If we don't study, where can we get knowledge? What's more, there are countless famous sayings about the benefits of reading. Let's talk about it Can't the experience summed up by so many celebrities and great men fully explain that "opening books is beneficial"?

Party B and Party C:

We have to admire the ability of Party A's debater to change the debate. However, the male debater used many famous sayings, which did not hide our correct views, but proved our correct views. If sages like Confucius, Sima Qian, Li Bai, Lu Xun and Guo Moruo do not read good books with healthy thoughts and carry forward the fine traditions of the Chinese nation, but read bad books that poison people, will they become famous and get married? Liu Xiang, a thinker in the Han Dynasty, once said: "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools." How accurate and vivid his words are! Since the book is a medicine blindly, it has two functions: first, it is a good medicine, exhorting life, curing ignorance, kindness and beauty, naturally curing diseases after taking it, and making people sober, noble and ambitious; One is poison, which confuses life, makes people more ignorant, turns ugliness into evil, makes people arrogant, has low virtue, has no ambition and even kills people. Right? A philosopher once said that a smart person is a person who can get the necessary nutrition. So we always believe that in the process of reading, we must learn to choose books. Resolutely don't read those harmful books, don't blindly believe famous sayings, and deceive yourself with what "opening books is beneficial"; What's more, you can't read everything with the so-called "curious" mentality. Such uncoiling is not only useless, but also harmful.

Moderator:

The debate between the two sides was very exciting, which fully demonstrated their views and benefited the audience present. The two sides expounded the significance, function, methods and approaches of reading from different angles. Personally, I think: both sides should put facts and reason, so as to understand "why study" and "how to study?" These two questions. Debate let us know that students should "read more books and read good books" since childhood, let the bright sunshine of healthy thoughts illuminate our beautiful childlike innocence, let colorful knowledge water our dried-up hearts, and read more good books on the premise of correctly choosing books suitable for children, so as to truly achieve the purpose of opening books. This is the end of the debate. Thank you again for your wonderful speeches and your active participation. See you in the next debate! (Applause)

Teacher Li comments:

From a certain height, this paper expounds the viewpoints of "opening books is beneficial" and "opening books is not necessarily beneficial" from different angles, and combined with the actual situation of extracurricular reading of primary school students, it shows its own position: not only to read more books, but also to read good books selectively. The correct viewpoint, clear facts, theory and practice make the argument incisive and refreshing. This paper fully shows the healthy and progressive character, the pursuit of truth and the exploration of enterprising personality charm, which makes us gasp in admiration.

(Instructor Li Jianzhong)

Some of them, I read from other places: Wolai tells you how to debate the origin of the benefits of open books because Song Taizu said, "As long as you study, it is always beneficial." Since then, it has become an idiom to open books.

You may think, why do you want to talk about this? The reason is simple, the key lies in the word "total" ... which means there will always be benefits, not just benefits. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate that reading is beneficial to opening books rather than harmless. Don't be entangled in this by the opposition, or you will lose. You will understand the reason after reading it. )

First of all, it is well known that it is good for good books. Therefore, it is necessary to demonstrate whether the so-called bad books have some advantages of their own. As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, it is big enough to make people fully realize, repent, move towards the bright road and succeed; Little ones should learn several writing methods, a few words and even know a few words. These are the benefits of reading, which is undeniable. So you can introduce a few points to demonstrate that bad books also have some benefits:

First, as long as it is called a bad book, it will definitely affect people's character and lead people astray. But please think about it, what if those bad books can't resonate with readers and make people go deep into them? If the structure and layout, expression, conception and description, language and writing of this book are plain,

Even the general "running account" composition is not as good as it is. How can it resonate with readers? Therefore, no matter how bad the book is, at least you can learn some writing methods in the so-called bad book, and at worst you can know a few words. Can you say it's useless?

Second, whether it is a bad book or a good book is judged according to whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. In other words, bad books also have certain benefits.

Thirdly, Laozi in ancient China had a view that everything has two sides. Since bad books are harmful, they must have their advantages.

Fourth, maybe you want to say, "Suppose there is a bad book, the content is unsightly, the layout of the article is completely wrong, and all the sentences are wrong ..." Until you can't find an advantage. But have you ever thought that even if there is such a book, can anyone understand it? Will you go and see it? ~ ~ ~ Since I won't go to see it, I don't even have the premise of "opening the book". How to talk about whether opening books is beneficial or harmful?

Fifth, although you can cite a bunch of examples of depravity, madness and crime because of reading, what can this show? It only shows that the reader's own mentality is wrong. It's a matter of mentality, and you can't blame it on books. Can anyone blame a knife for killing people with a knife?

Therefore, as long as you study, no matter how big or small, it is beneficial. Therefore, it can be inferred that "opening books is beneficial" will certainly be established.

As for "opening a book is not necessarily beneficial", it is a neutral word, half of which is right, but the other half-opening a book is not beneficial, so there is a problem: harmless. Just like a car on the road, it won't fly into the blue sky like an airplane. Can you say it's digging? If the argument is "open book is harmful", then according to some arguments just now, it can naturally be established, but it is wrong to say "useless". Therefore, on this issue, the opposing argument is only half right (and this half is still a positive argument).

Since the positive forum is definitely established and the negative argument is only half established, what is the reason for the argument? Obviously, the square is invincible!

There is also: Source: Song Bizhi's "Water Swallow and Literati" Tang Taizong reads three volumes of "Magnolia" every day, and makes up for it in his spare time. He tasted: "opening books is beneficial, but it is not tiring."

Interpretation: "Opening a book" means opening a book, that is, reading. Metaphor is good for reading.

Story: When Zhao Kuangyin, the great ancestor of the Song Dynasty, founded the Song Dynasty, there were still some separatist forces in various places. It was not until his younger brother Zhao Guangyi became emperor that the task of unifying the whole country was completed. After Zhao Guangyi acceded to the throne, he was renamed Zhao Guangling, known as Song Taizong in history. After Song Taizong unified the whole country, it was determined to carry forward the traditional culture and ordered to sort out all kinds of ancient books. At the same time, it also attaches importance to the collection of various ancient cultural materials. During the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom (976-983). Ordered the compilation of three books, Taiping Guang Ji, Taiping Yu Pinglan and Wenyuan Huaying, which made important contributions to the protection and development of chinese heritage.

Seven or eight of the ten ancient books cited in Taiping Yu Lan are now out of sight. So it can be said that it is a collection of cultural knowledge before the Northern Song Dynasty. The original name of this book is Taiping Bian. After editing, Song Dazong attached great importance to it and stipulated that he should read three volumes every day and finish them all after one year. So it was renamed "Taiping Magnolia", which means the book read by the emperor himself during the years of Taiping and Xingguo.

Song Taizong's political affairs are very busy. He often fails to read this book as planned because he is dealing with other things, so he makes up reading in his spare time. The courtiers were afraid that he would study too long and affect his health. Taizong said, "As long as I open a book to read, I will get benefits, so I don't feel tired."

Tanggula Mountain is the endless source of blood for you and me. The fire in the dragon bone marrow glows, which is the source of wisdom for you and me; A frame of five thousand years, that is the spiritual source of you and me. Books are the crystallization of human wisdom. As the ancients said, it is beneficial to open books.

Hold a frame of books and read 5,000 historical events; A pot of tea can travel 800 li. You don't have to rush in, you can watch Chu and Han go to war. There is no need to snow, so you can

Listen to the teacher's earnest instruction. Many students have studied Confucian classics since childhood, willing to bend their heads and study hard in order to enrich their knowledge system, and this is the most fundamental way to "open books". Cao Xueqin "read it for ten years and added and deleted it five times" before becoming a "masterpiece of the Red Chamber"; Ji Xiaolan won the title of "the best scholar in the world" for "reading widely and wandering around the sea of books" ... They all got the greatest benefit from "opening books".

The ancients said, "Those who often open books often learn from the past." It can be seen that opening books can also make people avoid repeating the mistakes of their predecessors. Reading "Ten Thoughts on admonishing Taizong" can warn yourself that "if you think high and risk, you will be modest and self-grazing; If you are afraid of flooding, you think of rivers and seas. " After reading the Analects of Confucius, we know that we should "save ourselves three times and do nothing for others". Don't believe in making friends? Can't you learn? "The ancients put their own life experiences, feelings and experiences into the book, so it is beneficial to open the book.

"Open book" can cultivate self-cultivation, cultivate sentiment and improve the spiritual realm of life. The heroic Su Shi, who sang "No Return to the Great River, No Escape from the Waves", created an "unrestrained school" and was a well-deserved "spiritual aristocrat". Li Yian, who is thinner than a yellow flower, weaves the shyness and disappointment of a "gentle" family; "Moonlight in the pine forest, crystal stone in the stream". Talking about Wang Wei's "Zen realm"; "I laughed from the horizontal knife and went to the liver and gallbladder to leave a name." Tan Sitong sang, "Why don't you avoid it because of the national disaster?" Singing patriotic enthusiasm ... in the long history, the ancients used their spirit to stir up thousands of waves. You just need to wander among them, and you can feel the same. It can be seen that opening books is beneficial.

Gorky said: "Books are the ladder of human progress." Uncoilers have existed since ancient times, and there is a reading method of "not seeking the law" by Mr. Wu Liu; There is also the reading method of "scrutinizing every word and speaking like a book" advocated by Zhu Guangqian; Wang Guowei called it three reading realms ... but in the final analysis, reading is beneficial, because reading is not only the source of knowledge, but also a lesson of the ancients, and it is also a method of self-cultivation.

Although "opening books is beneficial" is an idiom, I don't think it may be beneficial if you open books blindly.

Whether it is beneficial to open books mainly depends on who reads books, what books to read and age.

Unscrupulous people always absorb bad language and ideas when reading, no matter what books they read. On the contrary, when a person with excellent quality reads a book, he will read it selectively, and he will also take the rough and select the best, absorb good sentences, paragraphs and ideas, and reject bad language and ideas. If two people with completely different psychology both read a book about police and bandits, people with ulterior motives will learn how to solve crimes, while people with excellent quality will learn how to solve crimes.

It also matters what books you read. If you read unhealthy books, you can't absorb them well. Just like the comic book Crayon Shinchan, I think this book is a casual reading for adults, but now all the people who read this book are children who have no ability to judge right and wrong and have learned some bad languages and habits. So I don't think I can decide whether it is beneficial to open the book.

Personally, I think it is beneficial to open books!

Reading is of course good, but the key lies in how you read. This is very particular.

And what books to read is also very important.

There may be no need to say that opening books is beneficial.

It depends on what books you read and what you do with the computer.

It is certainly beneficial for you to open a book and read a good book, and it is extremely beneficial; It is certainly good for you to turn on the computer to surf the Internet, collect information and write. If you read some bad books or play computer games, it is definitely useless.

Young man, you can't say that.

You should use your head when reading, and it is right to read with a critical eye. You can't trust all the books because there are mistakes in them. I believe that all books are better than no books. Most history books are correct. Books with lies exist, but they are not all lies. You said, "Read as little history books as possible! Because they are all deceptive! " There is no basis. So I don't agree with you.

Agree with Mr. Shen!

I like reading history books very much.

Read history books

Can be clear!

I also agree with Teacher Shen! !

Everything has two sides, depending on how you look at it, hehe! !

Nothing in the world is absolute, the key lies in the reader's mentality.

Everything has two sides, and the key is whether it is good or bad under what circumstances!

If you want to say yes, that's good, if you don't want to, that's bad! Anyway, people who support this view must have their own reasons!

The ancients said, "Opening books is beneficial." Indeed, reading widely can make people knowledgeable, eloquent and respected.

Du Fu, an ancient poet, famously said, "Reading is like breaking thousands of volumes, and writing is like a god." It is undeniable that Du Fu exhibited it.

I have read countless books. Although many books have been turned over by him, the knowledge inside has been deeply imprinted in his mind.

In the past, he wrote articles and poems, and a string of good words and sentences flowed down from the pen tip, and a string of excellent poems spread.

Throughout the ages, it has been told by people. Therefore, reading more useful books can help us write good articles. Books are human nutrition.

Products are the source of human knowledge, just like a civilized country. If we lose the culture of books, it will be a once prosperous country.

The degree will face the threat of extinction. Therefore, people can never live without books.

However, people in modern society have overturned the ancient view that "opening books is beneficial" because they think that "opening books is beneficial".

Benefit. Of course, the statement that "reading books is beneficial" does not mean that reading more books is not beneficial, but that reading more unhealthy books will be beneficial.

It's not good for your body and mind. When you read more unhealthy books, your poisoning will get deeper and deeper, which will lead to.

You, rolling in the deep, have no chance to turn over again. What a tragic fate! In front of a person's beauty

The method lies in the type of books he chooses. If he chooses useful books, his future will be bright. such as

If he chooses those unhealthy books, his future will be dark, but if he can pull back from the brink in time, it is better late than never.

Xin, I believe he can have a bright future, too. Therefore, the statement that "opening books is beneficial" is not entirely true.

Reading more books is a good thing, but you must read books that are beneficial and harmless to your physical and mental health.

Opening books may not be beneficial, and sometimes (if you read bad books) it will cause damage. As educator Xu Teli said, "It's no use reading books about your family." Most unhealthy things come from reading those bad books. The criminal facts of some teenagers in today's society are a good proof, that is, they are polluted by those bad books and periodicals, infected with bad hobbies, and finally embark on the road of illegal crimes.

People often say: "It is beneficial to open books and read books." However, on closer examination, this statement is not entirely correct. If we are interested in every book, it may not be good to open it.

Nowadays, students may all like to read martial arts and romance novels, books and periodicals, and sometimes forget to eat or sleep. Once they get lost in reading, they will be possessed. Then they concentrate on books in class and have no intention to study, and their grades will plummet. Others are attracted by some plots in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes take the road of crime. Isn't reading killing yourself? This is only the first layer of "opening books is beneficial": opening books is beneficial. And the second floor.

The second is that we should have a choice when studying. Don't read unhealthy books that don't help us much. When reading, you should read some books that are beneficial to your physical and mental health and helpful to your study and life. Such a book is a good book. Only by reading well will you not ruin yourself. Some people compare books to friends. If you value books, you will make good friends and make progress. If you don't read good books, of course, you will make friends with people who don't make good friends, and then you will regress. Because near Zhu Zhechi, near Mexico is black! Therefore, only reading will be beneficial to you. Therefore, in my opinion, opening books may not be beneficial. I sincerely hope that every student can read books selectively. Don't lead yourself astray and ruin your life just because you read a wrong book.

I don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books. It is true that reading can make people increase their knowledge, cultivate their temperament and cultivate their body and mind, but "opening books" is only a necessary condition, not a sufficient condition.

Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty once said: "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools." Since books are medicine, they have two functions: first, good medicine will cure diseases; One is poison, which can kill people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 1920s, many people were regarded as Hitler's martyrs because of their bad influence on Mein Kampf. Bad books, like bad friends, may kill you. It's true. Now some students are addicted to martial arts or romance novels, reading those grotesque books all day, and "throwing" their homework aside, which leads to a decline in their academic performance, and finally draw water with a sieve. Just think, can a book like "Open" be said to be "beneficial"? "A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber." Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open a book depends on what volume to open first.

A philosopher once said that people who can get the necessary nutrition are healthier than those who eat more. At the same time, real scholars are often not people who read, but people who can read. Some people don't think seriously about reading, but just skim it. Some people read books that are not suitable for them, and some people even read books with a curious attitude. How can such an "open book" be useful?

As an emphasis on the importance of reading, the idiom "opening books is beneficial" naturally has its positive significance, but it is inappropriate to judge that "opening books is beneficial".

Two kinds of understanding

1, as the saying goes, reading is beneficial ~ According to the argument, reading is a good thing.

Then reading is not necessarily a good thing because of the position expressed by the other party.

The point of confrontation between the two sides lies in the understanding of open books ~ that is, the scope of understanding of books varies according to different positions ~ The arguments that the pros can support are like books allowed to be published by national laws, and they can promote a person from any aspect and from any angle.

The opposing view is that reading needs+discrimination ~ you can't read just for reading.

2. Open book is understood as open book in the exam.

This box can be illustrated by the fact that everyone's attention to the course will decline.

The opposing side can start with improving everyone's practical ability and comprehensive reading comprehension and analysis ability.

The positive views are: opening books is beneficial; The opposing view is that opening books may not be beneficial. I object. First of all, my understanding of "opening books is beneficial" is that opening books is not necessarily beneficial, including two layers. First, opening books is not necessarily beneficial; The other layer is not necessarily useless.

People often say: "It is beneficial to open books and read books." However, on closer examination, this statement is not entirely correct. If we are interested in every book, it may not be good to open it.

Nowadays, students may all like to read martial arts and romance novels, books and periodicals, and sometimes forget to eat or sleep. Once they get lost in reading, they will be possessed. Then they concentrate on books in class and have no intention to study, and their grades will plummet. Others are attracted by some plots in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes take the road of crime. Isn't reading killing yourself? This is only the first layer of "opening books is beneficial": opening books is beneficial. And the second floor.

The second is that we should have a choice when studying. Don't read unhealthy books that don't help us much. When reading, you should read some books that are beneficial to your physical and mental health and helpful to your study and life. Such a book is a good book. Only by reading well will you not ruin yourself. Some people compare books to friends. If you value books, you will make good friends and make progress. If you don't read good books, of course, you will make friends with people who don't make good friends, and then you will regress. Because near Zhu Zhechi, near Mexico is black! Therefore, only reading will be beneficial to you. Therefore, in my opinion, opening books may not be beneficial. I sincerely hope that every student can read books selectively. Don't lead yourself astray and ruin your life just because you read a wrong book.

I don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books. It is true that reading can make people increase their knowledge, cultivate their temperament and cultivate their body and mind, but "opening books" is only a necessary condition, not a sufficient condition.

Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty once said: "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools." Since books are medicine, they have two functions: first, good medicine will cure diseases; One is poison, which can kill people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 1920s, many people were regarded as Hitler's martyrs because of their bad influence on Mein Kampf. Bad books, like bad friends, may kill you. It's true. Now some students are addicted to martial arts or romance novels, reading those grotesque books all day, and "throwing" their homework aside, which leads to a decline in their academic performance, and finally draw water with a sieve. Just think, can a book like "Open" be said to be "beneficial"? "A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber." Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open a book depends on what volume to open first.

A philosopher once said that people who can get the necessary nutrition are healthier than those who eat more. At the same time, real scholars are often not people who read, but people who can read. Some people don't think seriously about reading, but just skim it. Some people read books that are not suitable for them, and some people even read books with a curious attitude. How can such an "open book" be useful?

As an emphasis on the importance of reading, the idiom "opening books is beneficial" naturally has its positive significance, but it is inappropriate to judge that "opening books is beneficial".

Books are the ladder of human progress. "In this era of knowledge economy, people's knowledge is getting deeper and deeper. If you don't follow hard, you will fall behind and fall further and further. So, in order to keep up with the times, you should keep learning.

Although the ancients said that books are "vast", I think the world of books is "eternal neighbors" This is definitely not an idealized analogy. No matter how big the world is, there is no gap. Buddha said, "Three Thousand Worlds" is huge. The situation of books, however, is all-encompassing and runs through the three realms.

We can stay at home and read books here at will. Who says scholars are short-sighted, unreasonable and indifferent to the world? Here you can gain rich experiences, know the world and make all kinds of friends. Often "drop in" in books, at least you can get rid of some ignorance and grow a few hearts!

In fact, you don't have to read carefully when you study. Just browsing, many a mickle makes a mickle. Over time, there will naturally be a treasure house of knowledge in your mind. Think about it. Isn't this the advantage of opening books?

If you want to deceive people, this method can completely pretend to be Boya. Now some people, after chatting with me, often say that I have read a lot of books. In fact, I didn't concentrate on reading many books, just flipped through them, just flipped through them often, so I know something!

If you want to truly "open books are beneficial", you must also have this hobby and love reading. I think if you like reading, you should practice every day, just as you like sports. Practice when you are sick, when it is windy and snowy, and especially when it is hot. Take exercise as a hobby. Anyone who is addicted to books can find great interest in every page of the book.

In order to "open books are beneficial", you must also choose books that suit you and let yourself live and swim freely in your favorite books.

"Open book is beneficial". If we study hard, we can accumulate knowledge, put our spirit on it and make our life more colorful.

People often say, "Open books are beneficial." But after careful study, this statement is not entirely correct. If we are interested in every book, it may not be good to open it.

Nowadays, students like to read novels and books such as martial arts and romance, and sometimes they can forget to eat and sleep. Once they enter the "role" in the book, they are possessed, and they are absorbed in the book in class and have no intention to study, and their grades plummet. What's more, they are attracted by the characters in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes even lead to crimes.

Why does "opening the book" have such serious consequences? I'm mainly looking at something. If everyone reads some unhealthy or unhealthy books, it will harm themselves. We must be wary of books that lead people astray! Although the plot of such a book is complicated, the more beautiful it is, the more it will plunge you into a deeper realm. Therefore, we must carefully look for books that are beneficial to us in the vast sea of books. This is the real "beneficial open book"! Fielding said, "Bad books, like bad friends, may hurt you." Indeed, we should read a good book and call a good friend, which will take you into the temple of books!

It can be seen that "opening a book is beneficial" must have a premise, that is, reading the "beneficial volume" and taking its essence. Only by studying hard and broadening our horizons can we truly realize the original intention of "opening books is beneficial" and benefit endlessly for life!

If you open the book blindly, it may not be beneficial.

"People who can read are afraid of things they can't do." This famous saying is that anyone who reads any book can do anything. Then, if that person reads a bad book and enjoys it, he may do bad things.

The Bishgachu in Nikolai Nikolai Gogol's Ghosts reads everything. He is not a man who reads widely, but a fool who lacks taste. Zhuangzi? Zhu Zeman in the Emperor's Crown learned a dragon slaying stunt. In fact, there is no place to kill dragons. He realized that there was no dragon in the world, and his skill was useless. In this way, it is always half the effort to open books indiscriminately, and it is not worth the loss!

Writer Zhao Shuli said: "Reading is like mining.

Eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen; Eating red dates is harmful to teeth; Taking this medicine is good for your health, but it also has side effects.

British writer Fielding said, "Bad books are like bad friends, which may kill you." If one-sided understanding of "open book is beneficial" means reading all the books, without choosing or asking the content, reading will be beneficial, but it is actually wrong! Be sure to learn a skill and choose the most valuable, insightful and good books that are suitable for you to read.

Therefore, I hope everyone will remember that opening books may not be beneficial, because no one is perfect. No book is completely correct.

It is necessary to demonstrate that reading is beneficial rather than harmless.