When it comes to light makeup, both dynasties are in favor of hanging silk on the temples. I used to recruit people to the front seat, and all I saw was eulogy and spoken words. If you can copy Oracle

When it comes to light makeup, both dynasties are in favor of hanging silk on the temples. I used to recruit people to the front seat, and all I saw was eulogy and spoken words. If you can copy Oracle Bone Inscriptions in ancient times, why pay attention to Mao's poems today? This poem is called "Pricking Guo", which was reportedly written by Liang Shuming, but was later denied.

This poem is about Guo Moruo's snobbery, first the Kuomintang, then * * *. Said he studied Oracle bones and annotated Mao Zedong's poems. There are so many hardships among the people, but Guo Moruo did not talk about them, but made these political speculations, which really failed his excellent writing style.

Guo Moruo was ridiculed by Lu Xun as a rogue wit in his early years. Later, when my generation was growing up, it was called a master of literature. As a representative of non-partisan Democrats, he has been engaged in political activities for a long time. A cultural giant like him has no choice but to become a slave and an apple polisher and give up his thoughts and personality. From this point of view, our generation, even with amazing ideas and iron personality, is just a healthy and hygienic object. It can be seen from the last two sentences of this poem that Liang still admires Guo's literary talent, but he just didn't speak for the people.

This poem has been circulated throughout the Cultural Revolution, and its true author cannot be verified, but people have always said that it was written by Mr. Liang Shuming. Liang Lao denied it when he was alive. From a certain point of view, whether this poem was written by Mr. Liang Shuming is not the most important. Most importantly, it expresses the people's voice and gives vent to their emotions.

In the last century, Mr. Liang Shuming, like many upright intellectuals, dared to speak out. He was lonely and arrogant. He is a figure that neither the Kuomintang nor communist party likes very much. In 1930s and 1940s, Mao Zedong published "Investigation Report on Peasant Movement in Hunan". "Fighting local tyrants and dividing fields" is a craze in the peasant movement in the old areas, but Liang Shuming and Yan are keen on the rural construction movement. 1936 In the first half of the year, Zhu Qihua published "Perspective of Rural Economy in China" in Shanghai. On behalf of the * * * people and the left wing of the Kuomintang, he criticized Liang and Yan's rural construction movement as "reformism" and thought that "rural construction" did not meet the needs of the revolutionary struggle and it was difficult to achieve the goal of expelling the enemy.

In the 50 years since the founding of the People's Republic of China, China intellectuals have gradually liberated from the shackles of the left, and their understanding of Liang and Yan has also tended to ease. Especially after many storms, some just intellectuals began to be well received by people. Li Xinglian introduced that Liang Shuming's comments on Guo Moruo's poems were quite interesting.

We don't know when Liang Shuming wrote this poem, and we don't know whether Guo Moruo read it when he was alive. However, it is clear to us that after the failure of 1927 Nanchang Uprising, although Guo Moruo joined China in the southern expedition, it has always been a role that is up for grabs. To put it mildly, it is called choosing good and following. Unfortunately, the seat Chiang Kai-shek gave him was a little small. Only after the founding of the People's Republic of China, Guo Moruo was proud, and Mao Dun (192 1 year was regarded as a member of * * *) and Ba Jin (Bolshevik outside the Party, without other nominations) became the leading figures in China's literary and art circles.

There is another article for your reference-

Liang Shuming's comment on Guo Moruo's poetry-free.

www.xawb.com 2004- 10-25

■ Bo Huang

Guo Moruo and Liang Shuming are both famous figures in modern China. There is a saying that connects them, that is, it is said that Liang Shuming made poetic comments on some behaviors of Guo in Wen Ge. This theory is widely circulated. Recently, a gentleman wrote "I love Liang Shuming" in a miscellaneous newspaper and made some comments on it. Unfortunately, the argument is wrong and worth distinguishing.

Said it was a literary husband case. A few years ago, China Reading Newspaper published a short article, "Does Liang Shuming write poetry? Among them, two old-style poems circulated during the Cultural Revolution were quoted and handed down as the works of Ran Shuming. At the same time, it is pointed out that when these two poems were published in Contemporary Poetry Journal, the editor familiar with the inside story of poetry added a small note to them, saying that Mr. Liang "never wrote poems." So "Does Liang Shuming write poetry?" I believe that after reading this article, readers will ask this question.

Let me talk about these two poems first. One is: in ancient times, there were nine Confucians and ten beggars, and now they are also called smelly Laojiu; In ancient Laojiu, people were still called, and today's Laojiu is not as good as dogs; Dictatorship depends entirely on knowledge, and the reaction is because of culture; If Marxism-Leninism is alive in this life, we should also find it out and walk all over the street. The second type is: light makeup is fashionable, and the two dynasties meet and hang their hair; Once you get to the front seat, you have to look at the best and spoken language; If you can copy Oracle Bone Inscriptions in ancient times, why pay attention to Mao's poems today? The sufferings of the people are clear and worthy of the pen in the palm of your hand.

These two poems are very interesting, especially the latter one. Those who know a little about the literary situation after the founding of the People's Republic of China will be amazed after reading it. These two poems, both written during the Cultural Revolution, are highly targeted and indeed conform to Mr. Liang Shuming's well-known honest character, which may be an important reason why the author of the poem and the author entrusted it as Mr. Liang's work.

As a descendant who respects Mr. Liang, I certainly hope that the authors of these two poems are Mr. Liang emotionally, but feelings can't replace rationality after all. Recently, it happened that a friend in Beijing sent me a volume of Liang Shuming's Letters (China Literature and History Publishing House, first edition, 1996), in which two letters explained from the front and back that the above poems were not written by Mr. Liang. One was written in 1977, and my old friend Chen Zhongyu "asked me to write old poems". After Liang wrote an old poem, he wrote "Ignorance": "1935 is a poem for Chen Zhongyu, which is the only poem in my life. I haven't written it before, and I haven't written it since …" Another letter is Liang's answer to a friend's inquiry. A friend copied a poem and said in a letter to Liang: "This poem has sentences such as' light makeup is fashion' and' disappointment in the palm of your hand', which is called' Liang Shuming's work'." Mr. Liang wrote a sentence next to this poem: "I have never written a rhyme in my life to this day. Of course, this poem was not written by me." Liang Shuming first wrote an old-fashioned poem for his good friend Chen Zhongyu, and later said that the seven-rhythm poem was not written by himself, but was revealed in private letters between old friends for decades. Its authenticity is beyond doubt. With Mr. Liang's character, if he were a poet, he would never write it as a cover.

Liang Shuming never wrote a poem, saying that he wrote it to comment on Guo Moruo. Maybe some people will feel a little sorry? In Song Dynasty, Ceng Gong, an ancient prose writer, would not be accused of being a wet blanket, while Mr. Liang Shuming was a thinker. Whether he can write some old poems really doesn't matter. As for whether he wrote such a sharp poem to comment on Guo Moruo, it does not prevent modern people from making their own comments on these two former sages. Let us respect the truth of history.