Is Ying Zheng really a cruel monarch who burned books and buried Confucianism?

Maybe you will say yes, maybe you will be vague. As for whether Qin Shihuang can be equated with cruelty, in my opinion, it is not easy to draw a conclusion. At least he is an excellent monarch.

There are so many curses about Qin Shihuang in later generations that we can't get rid of this illusory coat and see what the real Qin Shihuang is like behind history.

Qin Shihuang conquered six countries in ten years, unified China, and established the first feudal empire in China history on the land of Central Plains. Although the feudal system is not good, it is still in slavery compared with other parts of the world at the same time. The empire established by Qin Shihuang was promoted by more than one and a half stars.

In addition, many legal systems governing the country formulated by Ying Zheng during the Qin Dynasty lasted for hundreds of generations and are still in use today.

So, why did the world criticize Qin Shihuang so much? In fact, it is more because Qin Shihuang burned books to bury Confucianism. Is Ying Zheng really a cruel monarch? Actually, it is not.

Why did Ying Zheng burn books to bury Confucianism? Not because of his cruelty, but because of the anger of normal people, Ying Zheng's behavior is not what we remember. Regarding this historical event, I want to bring salt to Ying Zheng, the first Qin Emperor.

What book did you burn when you burned it?

The original text of burning books to bury Confucianism means burning poems and witches, which means that Qin Shihuang's actions in Qin Dynasty were selective, rather than burning all the books indiscriminately. In addition, this proposal was implemented at the suggestion of Prime Minister Li Si, with the purpose of strengthening centralization, maintaining the rule of the Qin Dynasty and destroying the rebellious psychology of the six countries.

This kind of behavior seemed cruel at the time, but it was also reasonable. Since then, China has been reunified by the State of Qin for eight generations, and for more than 200 years, finally, with the efforts of Ying Zheng, it has achieved eternal hegemony. No one wants such a big family business to be destroyed, so Qin Shihuang's behavior is not as cruel as we remember now.

Let's talk about burning books. At that time, the Qin Dynasty ruled by legalists. Li Si, the Prime Minister, and Ying Zheng, the First Qin Emperor, were loyal supporters of Legalism. However, Confucian scholars such as Shangshu, Shi and Shu emphasized benevolence and righteousness, which was completely contrary to the legalists at that time. This kind of Confucianism was not suitable for the Qin Dynasty at that time. These poems were burned only to better strengthen and consolidate the rule of the Qin Dynasty.

The books burned at that time were only those that violated legalism and were not conducive to rule. Books on agriculture and medicine were not burned by Qin Shihuang. In addition, when Qin Shihuang burned these books, he also ordered the Prime Minister to make a copy and keep it in Epang Palace. Later, Xiang Yu, the overlord of Chu, burned it cleanly, and these copies were gone. Therefore, in terms of burning books, Xiang Yu, the overlord of Chu, has an unshirkable responsibility.

Who are the people who cheat Confucianism?

In fact, Qin Shihuang was not a supporter of Confucianism at that time, but a warlock. Many people are unfamiliar with warlocks and don't know what kind of occupation this is. In fact, to put it bluntly, warlocks are astrologers, just like those who say they can tell fortune now, but they are said to be able to cure diseases.

By the end of Qin Shihuang's reign, he gradually became attached to the world, so he didn't want to die. He wants to live forever. At this time, the warlocks gathered in Xianyang began to stir and felt that it was time to make a fortune. The representatives of these warlocks are Lu Sheng, Hou Sheng and later Xu Fu.

This time, Lu Sheng and Hou Sheng told Qin Shihuang that they could find the elixir for Qin Shihuang and asked Qin Shihuang for a lot of gold, silver and jewels. But the two shameless magicians escaped. Qin Shihuang felt that his IQ was insulted and he was very angry. He also saw the true colors of these magicians, so Qin Shihuang ordered more than 400 magicians to be arrested in Xianyang, and all of them went into the pit.

Think about it, who is not angry about this? Besides, these unscrupulous wizards even dare to cheat the emperor, let alone ordinary people. The emperor was cheated of gold, silver and jewels, but the people were cheated of life security, but they starved to death. From this perspective, Qin Shihuang actually cheated money to save people.

Comment on flying fish:

Is Ying Zheng really a cruel monarch who burned books and buried Confucianism? In fact, why did Ying Zheng burn books to bury Confucianism? Not because he is cruel, but because of the anger of normal people. If Qin Shihuang was really a tyrant, he might have killed more than just warlocks.

Actually, in history? Burning books? And then what? Pit Confucianism? These two historical events in different periods, the former is closely related to the selfishness of prime minister Reese, and the latter is more anger after being played. When these two different events are put together, they are actually more of a means for later generations to discredit Qin Shihuang.

History is always written by winners. In order to show their legitimacy to later generations, they always discredit the former dynasty by hook or by crook, which is what the rulers have done since the feudal regime changed more than two thousand years after the Qin Dynasty.

Those old nobles who clamored to restore the respective rule of the six countries thought that the system of the Qin Dynasty was not good. Even if the Qin Dynasty perished, there would be no more waves, because the progress of history would always eliminate the old system.