Learning is based on learning, and I am in favor of debating materials.

When you stand, you should interpret knowledge as knowledge. If it is interpreted as learning and consulting, it will be beneficial to the other party.

You should be careful that the other person splits words and bypasses the learning routine. If learning is explained by learning and asking questions, after all, no matter what you have learned before learning, asking questions is always the premise. If there is no doubt, how can people have learning goals? Learning without goals is undoubtedly passive water, so learning must be based on asking questions. Of course, if you can't find a good argument, you will inevitably be suspected of stealing the theme, but starting from this aspect, at least you won't be too passive.

In case they raise this point on the spot, you can give an example: we learn to speak, pronounce and count from childhood, not because we are confused. Because we were born to learn. Can you say that children learn to call their parents because they have doubts?

Debate is a very profound subject. It is best for the whole team to sit together and discuss, exchange ideas, find a foothold and fight around that point. Write your own manuscript, that makes sense.

I don't know if you have debated it. I hope it helps you.