Scientific fortune telling 3_ Is scientific fortune telling accurate?

Fortune-telling is a prediction of fate.

Basic knowledge:

What is a forecast? For a woman who has just been pregnant 100 days, if there is no accident, we assert that a little life will be born in about 180 days; For a gentleman who just bought a plane ticket to Los Angeles, we assert that this friend will arrive in Los Angeles in a few days, if nothing unexpected happens. These are extremely simple and intuitive predictions. Can people use prediction in real life? To be exact, all vertebrates have been using prediction. If you want to go out and see dark clouds gathering, take an umbrella; When you see a car coming in the distance, you will immediately avoid it; The earthquake is coming, and poultry farmers are reluctant to enter the circle.

The establishment of the theoretical system of any discipline or theory requires some postulates, rather than coming out of thin air. For example, the basic law in mathematics, 1+ 1=2, does not need to be proved, and it is impossible to prove it, because it requires conditions to prove a proposition. To prove 1+ 1=2, it must be more basic than 1+ 1=2. Where do these conditions come from? Endless, can't find the pole. For another example, Newton's law of gravity, the root of classical mechanics, does not need to be proved, at least it has not been proved yet, but it is only found from phenomena, but this law is the basis of classical mechanics. For another example, Einstein's theory of relativity is based on the constant speed of light, so there is no need to prove that the speed of light is constant. The postulate on which a subject depends may not be applicable in all cases, but as long as it can be applied within a certain range, the subject has the meaning of existence. For example, the once recognized law of matter immortality (law of conservation of mass). When Einstein put forward the concept of mass-energy conversion and gave the formula E = MC &；; # 178; After that, it can only be applied in a limited scope. Without exception, the forecast is also based on several postulates, and these postulates also have their scope of application.

The value of any discipline or theory is that it can bring benefits to mankind. For example, physics allows us to understand the basic structure and laws of motion of matter, thus guiding us to act on objects in a more energy-saving way. Another example is chemistry, which allows us to understand the microstructure and reaction principle of substances, thus guiding us to synthesize the required substances in a more energy-saving way. Another example is biology, which allows us to understand the position of human beings in the food chain, the survival mechanism of human beings and the evolution process of human beings, thus guiding us to deal with the relationship between human beings and the natural environment and other creatures more harmoniously. Without exception, the value of prediction is to help us explore the past and guide the future, thus avoiding misfortune.

The whole process of proof is as follows

Definition 1: Five Elements and Yin and Yang:

The five elements are five symbols that can represent all tangible and intangible things, which are generally represented by five Chinese characters: wood, fire, earth, gold and water. Yin and Yang are two symbols, which can represent the unity of opposites in all visible and invisible things, such as day and night, positive and negative charges, matter and antimatter.

Note 1: For the convenience of writing, a, b, c, d and e are used in many places to represent wood, fire, earth, gold and water respectively.

Definition 2: Basic characteristics of five elements:

Definition 3: Life and Gram:

Note ②: For convenience in the future, the symbols "{"and → "will be used in many places to represent life and gram respectively, and the symbols"} "and" ← "will be used to represent life and gram accordingly. For example, A}B=B{A, which means that A is born by B, A is born by B, and B is the main student.

Postulate 1: All visible and invisible things change regularly with time and space, and all visible and invisible things can be divided into two sides of unity of opposites.

Postulate 2: there is a gram relationship between the five elements; In an infinite range, yin and yang are balanced and the five elements are equal.

Postulate 3: All visible and invisible things are developing in the direction of minimizing environmental constraints.

Attachment: The natural selection principle of biological evolution in senior high school and Le Chatelet principle of chemistry in senior high school are both special cases of this postulate.

Theorem 1: Wood fires, fire produces soil, native gold, gold produces water, aquatic wood.

Proof: Call definition one, all visible and invisible things can be represented by five lines.

Call it postulate, all tangible and intangible things change with the change of time and space, that is, with the change of time and space, the five elements are also changing.

If the space-time position of definition 2 is called, in a period of time or space, the order of the five elements is: wood comes first, fire comes second, earth comes third, gold comes fourth and water comes last. That is, with the change of time and space, wood becomes fire, fire becomes soil, soil becomes gold, gold becomes water, and water becomes wood. In the case of constant time and space, wood often turns into fire, cremation into soil, soil into gold, gold into water, and water into wood.

It is called the definition of Sansheng, wood makes a fire, fire makes soil, soil makes gold, gold makes water, aquatic wood.

Attached theorem 1: A{B, B{C, C{D, D{E, e {a a.

Proof: Call Theorem 1, Wood Fires, Fire Born Soil, Native Gold, Gold Born Water, aquatic wood.

Call attention to 1, A gives birth to B, B gives birth to C, C gives birth to D, D gives birth to E, and E gives birth to A. ..

Call note ②, A{B, B{C, C{D, D{E, e {a a.

Inference 1: A}E, E}D, D}C, C}B, b} a.

Proof: Call the accessory theorem 1, A{B, B{C, C{D, D{E, e {a a.

Call, A}E, E}D, D}C, C}B, B}A in note ②.

Theorem 2: Mutuko, Tukeshui, Shuihuoke, Huojinke, Jin Kemu.

It is proved that the five elements of wood, fire, earth, gold and water are a sequential cycle, and the cycle order is: wood-fire-earth-gold-water-wood.

Let postulate two, and the five elements are equal. Therefore, as long as Mutuko was established, Tukeshui, Shuihawk, Huojinke and Jinkemu were established in turn.

There is a gram relationship between the five elements when calling postulate. Therefore, at least one of the five situations of Mukemu, Mukehuo, Muketu, Mukejin and Mukeshui is true.

The discussion is divided into 1, 2,3,4,5:1. Suppose mukemu exists. Because the five elements are equal, similarly, there are fire, earth, gold and water. The cultivation of the five elements will weaken itself until it dies, that is, wood, fire, earth, gold and water will die.

Call the definition, and the five elements can represent all visible and invisible things. So everything visible and invisible will die. This is impossible, so the assumption is not true, that is, Mukemu does not exist.

(2) suppose there is a wood fire.

Called the definition of three grams, wood can limit, control or destroy fire.

Call theorem one, wood makes a fire. In other words, wood can help, produce or transform into fire. This contradicts the above conclusion, so the assumption is not established, that is, there is no wood fire.

(3) Assume that there is muke soil. Because the five elements are equal, by the same token, Jin Kemu also exists between soil and water, water and fire, fire and gold. At this time, gold restricts wood.

Call theorem one, wood makes a fire, native gold, and gold makes water. If wood is used as soil, gold will not be born, so the existence of wood can weaken the restriction of gold on wood; Wood can subdue soil and soil can subdue water, so the existence of wood is beneficial to water, which makes water flourish, and gold releases too much water, which is not conducive to gold, so the existence of wood can also weaken the restriction of gold on wood; Wood fire is good for fire, and fire can kill gold. So in this case, the existence of wood can still weaken the restriction of gold on wood. In a word, all the relations between birth and Kecong wood can weaken the restriction of gold on wood.

Calling postulate three gains, the existence of wood will minimize the constraint of gold on wood. Therefore, this assumption conforms to the postulate and is established. We find that the existence of wood can not only weaken the bondage of gold to wood, but also subdue the soil. Because water is controlled by soil, the owner of wood (water) benefits and helps the wood itself from another angle.

(4) Suppose Mukherjee exists. Because the five elements are equal, in the same way, Golden Hawk, Fire, Water, Water, Earth and Tukemu also exist. At this time, the soil restricts the wood.

It's called Theorem 1, wood makes a fire, fire makes soil, and soil makes gold. Wood makes a fire, and fire can kill water, so wood indirectly restricts water and water decays. Because the soil is subject to water, the native land is beneficial; Wood fires, and fire regenerates soil, which is also beneficial to soil; Wood fire is good, but gold and gold have their own consumption at the same time, so it is not good for gold. Because gold is born in the soil, gold weakness makes the power of the soil nowhere to vent, which is still good for the soil. In short, all relations between life and gram are beneficial to the soil from wood.

The existence of wood will weaken the soil to the greatest extent. Therefore, this assumption does not hold, that is, Fengtian does not exist.

⑤ Suppose there is mook water. Because the five elements are equal, in the same way, water, gold, earth, earth, fire and wood also exist. At this time, fire restricts the wood.

Call theorem one, wood makes a fire, fire makes soil, soil makes gold, and gold makes water. Wood makes a fire, so the existence of wood is beneficial to fire; Mu ke water, so the existence of wood is not conducive to water, and gold is subject to water, so the existence of wood is beneficial to gold, and soil is subject to gold, so the existence of wood is not conducive to soil, and fire is subject to soil, so the existence of wood is beneficial to fire; Wood water is weak, gold water is weak, and the power of gold has nowhere to vent. Therefore, the existence of wood is beneficial to gold, and soil makes gold. Jin Wang let the soil vent too much, which is not good for the soil. Weak soil makes the fire have nowhere to vent, which is beneficial to the fire. In a word, the relationship between all life and kemu is beneficial to fire.

It is called postulate three gains, and the existence of wood will minimize fire. So this assumption is not true, that is, Mukeshui does not exist.

To sum up, suppose ③ is unique, and skillfully and accurately satisfies [postulate III] uniquely.

Therefore, Mu, Tuk water, water, Huo, Jin Kemu.

P.S.: Actually, one sentence should be added to postulate three. The change and development of things cannot completely eliminate constraints.

Attached theorem 2: A→C, C→E, E→B, B→D, d → a.

Proof: Call Theorem II, Mutuko, Tuk Shui, Shui Hawk, Huo Jinke, Jin Kemu.

Call note 1 to get, a gram c, c gram e, e gram b, b gram d, d gram a.

Call the notes ②, A→C, C→E, E→B, B→D, D → A.

Inference 2: A←D, D←B, B←E, E←C, C ← A.

Proof: Call the accessory theorem 2, A→C, C→E, E→B, B→D, D → A.

Call notes ②, A←D, D←B, B←E, E←C, c ← a.

Attachment: Read "Sheng", → "Ke",} "Born in", ← "Suppressed in". For example, A}B is pronounced a born in b, and A←B is pronounced a born in b.

Theorem 3: Any line in the five elements can be divided into two parts: Yin and Yang.

Proof: Call the definition to get one, and the five elements can represent all visible and invisible things.

Called postulate, all visible and invisible things can be divided into two sides of the unity of opposites. So any line in the five elements can be divided into two sides of the unity of opposites.

Definition of address 1. Yin and Yang are symbols used to express two sides of the unity of opposites. So any one of the five elements can be divided into yin and yang. That is, wood, fire, earth, gold and water can be subdivided into yang wood, yin wood, yang fire, yin fire, yang soil, yin soil, yang gold, yin gold, yang water and yin water. In this book, Chinese characters A (α), B (β), C (γ), D (δ), E (ε), G (θ), Xin (λ), Ren (μ) and Gui (ξ) will stand for Yang wood, Yin wood, Yang fire and Yin respectively. For things or five elements with the same yin and yang attributes, this book is called homosexuality for short; For things with different yin and yang attributes or five elements attributes, this book is referred to as the opposite sex.

Theorem 4: Homosexuality is greater than heterosexuality.

Proof: Call Theorem II, Mutuko, Tuk Shui, Shui Hawk, Huo Jinke, Jin Kemu. As shown below, Muketu. It can be proved that not only the wood in OA section has the greatest soil resistance to BC section, but also the wood in OA section has the greatest soil resistance to BC section. Suppose that the soil of Mu Ke BC section in OA section is not the largest, but there are two points P and Q different from O and A, which satisfy OP=AQ and OA=PQ, so that the wood of PQ section has the largest force on the soil of BC section. Because PA < OA and has a common end point A, the wood contained in OA section is greater than that contained in PA section, that is, the grammage of OA and BC is greater than that of PA and BC; It can be seen from the figure that the OA section belongs to the Wang Mu range, and the AB section belongs to the fire king range, so the fire in the AQ section acts on the soil in the BC section, so the gram force of PA and BC is greater than that of PQ and BC. To sum up, the grams of OA and BC are greater than the huoreg of PQ and BC, that is, the grams of PQ and BC cannot be the largest, so the assumption is not valid. It is proved that the wood in OA section is not only the soil in BC section, but also the most powerful.

Call it postulate, all visible and invisible things are constantly changing with the change of time and space. We can know that change is the essence of things, but the five elements are the definition we make in order to understand things, that is, birth and death exist in things, and we are not limited to the five elements. In the above figure, the force of the OA segment G BC segment can be concentrated on two points, X (on OA, but not marked) and Y (on BC, but not marked), so that the force of X on Y is the largest.

Let postulate two, and the five elements are equal. So OX=BY. If the X and Y points are extended or shortened to the left and right respectively, so that the distances extended or shortened to the left and right are equal, it can be proved that a section of L (not marked) extended or shortened from the X point and a section of L' force extended or shortened from the Y point also meet the maximum requirements. In the figure, u represents five elements, k represents space, t represents time, and the curve represents the relationship between the content of five elements in wood and time (the curve may be inaccurate, but it does not affect the proof process). If A, B, C, D and E represent wood, fire, earth, gold and water respectively, then U (wood) is U(A). If U(A)=f(k) or U(A)=f(t), then u (b) = f (k-t/5) = f (k-5/5) = f (k-1) or u (b) = f (t-). The total number of five elements at any point U=U(A)+U(B)+…+U(E). Because things can't disappear out of thin air, so the five elements can't disappear out of thin air in the transformation, then U is a constant, and two grams with the same distance are equivalent, so L and its corresponding L' gram are also the largest.

It is called postulate two, yin and yang are balanced, and the five elements are equal. Because poplar and soil correspond to the positive positions in wood and soil respectively, we can know that the length of abscissa occupied by poplar and soil is equal, that is, the distance m from the right end of poplar to point O and the distance n from the right end of soil to point B are equal. Because OA=BY, you can get poplar and soil by extending or shortening X and Y to the left and right by the same distance. So far, we know that poplar and soil are L and L' obtained by X and Y transformation at a fixed distance, so the acrylic power between poplar and soil is the greatest, and the acrylic power between any same sex is also the greatest. So it is proved that the same-sex resistance is greater than that of the opposite sex.

Theorem 5: The same sex is stronger than the opposite sex.

Proof: Call Theorem 4, the same-sex acrylic force is greater than that of the opposite sex. As for A, we know that Geng and Xin are of the same sex, so Geng's resistance to A is greater than Xin's resistance to A, and Geng's resistance to A is greater than any heavenly stem. Similarly, the force of C on Geng is greater than that of any heavenly stems.

By calling postulate, all visible and invisible things develop towards the direction of minimizing environmental constraints. Therefore, the help of A to C and D will weaken Geng's strong restraint on A to the greatest extent. Because C has the greatest power over G, A must be able to help C to the greatest extent, not D. We will compare the following three situations: ① A is as vital as C and D; ② The activity of A to C is less than that of A to D; ③ The vitality of A to C is greater than that of A to D. Only ③ can satisfy [postulate 3]. In other words, the vitality of a to c is greater than that of a to d ... and so on, it can be proved that the vitality of the same sex is greater than that of the opposite sex, and it is the largest. So the vitality of the same sex is greater than that of the opposite sex.

Theorem 6: The future is certain.

Prove: By calling postulate one, all visible and invisible things change regularly with time and space. From this we know that for a given thing, there are given rules to make it change. If the status quo of something is S0, there is a rule F, which changes S0 and finally becomes S 1. In other words, if all the initial conditions of things are given, then the future changes of things are certain, and the final result is also certain. To sum up, the future is certain.

Attachment: Theorem 6 is a controversial theorem in modern scientific circles. According to the theory of British physicist Newton and the exposition of French mathematician Laplace, we know that there are certain laws (theorems, laws, etc. For any given thing in the universe, this makes the future of things certain. Halley's Comet returned as scheduled in 1757, and Neptune was found in the predicted position in 1846, which proved that things were predictable at least to some extent and that the future was certain to some extent. Many people strongly resist this theory because they think it may interfere with their freedom. Some scientists put forward "chaos" and "uncertainty principle" to refute the future certainty theory. For an object whose relationship between force and position or velocity is not linear, its motion mode is chaotic, which is called "chaos". For microscopic particles, it is impossible to accurately measure their position and momentum at the same time. This theory is called the uncertainty principle. However, if we carefully study the experiments of "chaos" and "uncertainty principle", we will find that the laws and equipment used in these two experiments only stay at the existing level, that is to say, the existing laws and equipment can not describe the future state of the object, but it can not prove that the future laws and equipment can not describe the future state of the object in this experiment, because science is progressive. We found that there is a saying in the "chaos" experiment that "when the vibration frequency of the frame is constant for many times, if the initial conditions are slightly different, the vibration of the oscillator will be obviously different". That is to say, in many experiments, if the initial conditions are exactly the same, you will get the same result, that is, for objects with exactly the same initial conditions, the final state is unique, that is, for some objects with initial conditions, their motion laws are the same as theirs. We found that the "uncertainty principle" experiment used photons to measure the position and momentum of microscopic particles. In order to accurately measure the position of particles, the wavelength of photons should be as short as possible. According to c=λυ, decreasing wavelength will lead to increasing frequency, and then according to E=hυ, increasing frequency will lead to increasing energy. The impact of photons on particles will cause great changes in particle momentum, which makes it impossible to accurately measure the position and momentum of particles at the same time. It can be seen that this is caused by the limitations of existing experimental equipment and laws. In addition, the uncertainty principle gives an uncertainty relation (inequality), which further shows that particles are not random. At least, it is found that particles follow the uncertainty relationship and a large number of particles follow the normal distribution law, so the behavior of particles can be found in the macro. Rules are the basis of forecasting. Only when there are rules can you predict, but you can't predict without rules. Based on the above conclusions, we know that the future is certain.

Theorem 7: The future cannot be completely predicted.

Proof: Assuming that the future can be completely predicted by reduction to absurdity, that is to say, everything in the future can be accurately predicted, then human beings can accurately predict everything they will do in the future and cannot change it (the future is certain), but we know that human beings have autonomy and are free to choose whether or not to do something and how to do it, which is contradictory to complete prediction, so the assumption is not valid and the future cannot be completely predicted.

Theorem 8: The future has a certain degree of predictability.

It is proved that the future cannot be predicted completely by calling Theorem 7. This proposition is divided into two parts: ① the future has a certain degree of predictability; ② The future is impossible to predict. Because the proposition that the future cannot be completely predicted is true, at least one of the two propositions ① and ② is correct. If we want to prove that Theorem 8 is correct, we only need to prove that Proposition 2 is wrong. Assuming that proposition 2 is correct, that is, the future cannot be predicted at all, we can infer as follows. The weather forecast no longer exists, because the weather is simply unpredictable; Table tennis players will never improve their level, because the impact of the ball is unpredictable; People are afraid to cross the road anymore, because the direction and speed of cars are unpredictable. As we know, these are contrary to the facts, so proposition 2 is incorrect and the future is predictable to some extent.

Ps: Why is the future predictable, but not completely predictable? This is closely related to the premise required for forecasting. There are two prerequisites for forecasting: (1) the initial conditions of things; (2) the changing law of things. Only when these two premises are explored completely and accurately can the future be predicted completely. But these two premises cannot be completely and accurately explored, so we can only predict the future to a certain extent. In other words, although the future is certain, human beings cannot predict it completely and accurately. For example, you are reading the postscript of Theorem 8 now. It will definitely happen when you look at Theorem 8, but you can't predict the exact content of the postscript when you look at Theorem 8. For another example, we can predict that human science and technology will be more developed after one year, but we can't predict the living conditions of human beings after 1 100 million years, because there are too many unknown rules and unknown initial conditions, which makes our prediction ability limited. What people can do independently is the unpredictable part of the future.

Conjecture: There is an induction field, so that the fate of anything (including the past and the future) is induced on other things (including itself), and this induction weakens with the extension of the interval.

The basis of this conjecture: 1982, a research organization led by Alain Aspect, a physicist at the University of Paris, conducted an experiment that may be the most important in the 20th century. Aspect and his team found that in some cases, subatomic particles, such as electrons, can communicate with each other when they are moving after they are emitted in opposite directions at the same time. No matter how far apart they are, whether they are ten feet apart or a hundred thousand miles apart, they always seem to know the movement pattern of the opposite side. When one party is influenced to change direction, both parties will change direction at the same time. The problem with this phenomenon is that it violates Einstein's theory, because no communication can exceed the speed of light.

Attachment: I think this is the only feasible guess through repeated thinking about Zhouyi prediction, four-column prediction and name prediction.

Conjecture reasoning: Because the induced field in conjecture has not been discovered, we can only examine its existence through phenomena. A large number of prediction phenomena prove that Zhouyi prediction, four-column prediction and name prediction are all readers of this induction field. For this "massive prediction phenomenon", this book will elaborate from the perspective of name prediction. If readers are interested in Zhouyi prediction or four-column prediction, they can refer to the author's related works.

Attachment: In this book, tools that can predict fate, such as eight characters, names and faces, will be called "fate reader" and "prediction accuracy" will be called "readability". The higher the prediction accuracy, the better the readability.

Law 1: Law of Isobaric Induction: Everything has the same fate as other things, but there are strong and weak points. Strong direct contact, weak indirect or long-distance induction.

Attachment: For example, from the eight characters of a person, it is found that this person was worried about death in 20 18, then from the eight characters of his parents, it can be concluded that A was worried about death in 20 18. Not only that, you can get the same information from A's name, face and even all "fate readers".