Seeking the materialist dialectical explanation of the principle of quantum mechanics

1, because "consciousness" is something that has no clear scientific definition. No one can give an accurate definition of "consciousness". Every physical quantity in physics has a very clear definition, and the thing "consciousness" is ambiguous. Some people say it's consciousness, others say it's not consciousness. If we put a person's brain on a table to ensure that it has blood supply (that is, to provide him with energy and ensure that it is alive), we naturally think that this brain will have "consciousness" because it can think, even though it can't move and express. What happened next was terrible. Plants can also provide energy through light and action. Plants are alive. So do they also have "consciousness" and daydream all day? Furthermore, seemingly inanimate things around us may also have "consciousness" in this way, because what is the difference between a brain and a head on a table? If people make computers and robots, can computers also be considered "conscious"? Although computers are still very low-level and far from intelligence, it is undeniable that computers are developing in the direction of intelligence, and it is entirely possible to make computers with the same IQ as people one day. Will computers have "consciousness" then? So there is no definition of what "consciousness" is, so it is unthinkable for those who advocate learning to introduce undefined things into science. The difference between superstition and science is that there is no definition of superstitious things, and fortune tellers can explain them according to their own meaning.

There is no way to give an answer at present. No one knows why the wave function collapses. Therefore, whether materialist dialectics can explain this question can only be answered later.

3. It is hard to say what is the mechanism of measuring the influence system. Such as measuring position, in order to accurately use short wavelength. However, the short wave length and high energy will seriously interfere with the speed. Through a lot of experimental analysis, the influence of measurement on the system itself is summarized. Personally, I think so. No matter how you measure it, you must contact and interact with the system. It is this interaction that leads to the change of the system and affects the original physical quantity of the system.

This question is the same as the first one. Consciousness has no definition. You say it is the influence of consciousness, others say it is not. None of us know anything, so none of you can overthrow anyone.

Materialist dialectics is accepted by everyone at present, because many things are objective and true and are not influenced by our subjective thoughts. For example, you think it doesn't rain, but it does, and it won't change because of your thoughts. But this materialist dialectics is also challenged, which is quantum mechanics. Because things are influenced by our measurement, and measurement is subjective (what is measurement unclear). Nothing in the world is absolutely right. Science does not recognize the existence of God, but science cannot deny the existence of God. Maybe all this is god's arrangement. As I answer your question now, science says it is coincidence, but science can't tell why I wrote such an answer instead of others. Maybe all this is a coincidence arranged by God. So I can only say that maybe materialist dialectics is wrong.