The absorption of formaldehyde by chlorophytum is pseudoscience.

This question is a bit rigorous, and there has been a struggle between science and pseudoscience in history. We know that the right thing will definitely defeat the wrong thing, and science is correct, so it will definitely defeat pseudoscience.

Why? First of all, we must define science. According to the general explanation, science is a knowledge system about nature, society and thinking, and it is a correct understanding of the objective world on the basis of practice. From this, we can easily understand that real scientific laws can stand objective logical reasoning, and scientific products can stand empirical evidence and scientific hypotheses, which are based on the correct understanding of predecessors. Pseudoscience, on the other hand, is a trick in the name of science. There is no real science.

Of course, we can't criticize the failure of scientific exploration as pseudoscience, and the example of pseudoscience is not an example of scientific exploration failure. For example, if someone talks to a sponge and then tries to squeeze out the words, it can only be said that this person does not understand the science of recording. True pseudoscience, 1. It is to put some theories on the hat of science to serve their own purposes, and these theories are far-fetched, empirical and universal. For example, palm reading is a theory in Chinese medicine. For thousands of years, our ancestors have found a certain correspondence through summary, which is of universal significance. But it is fruitless to predict people's fate by palm reading. If you want to explore this aspect, you can. But pseudoscience claims that this matter has been solved, and you can show it to you after paying the money, but this prediction is unrepeatable and can't stand the empirical evidence. It can be seen that pseudoscience has another feature, that is, doing other things in the name of science. 2. Some phenomena are explained for private purposes, such as the common feudal superstition that raw eggs can stand on the cutting edge under certain conditions. Lightning strikes can also happen, but some people want to explain that it is possessed by ghosts. Someone offended heaven just to ask someone to help him eliminate the disaster and let him take the money himself. 3. Grafting an untenable theory into scientific objects under the guise of scientific products, claiming to be science, such as the computer fortune-telling upstairs, and the medicine for curing the Millennium bug sold by Jianghu doctors for a long time. 4. The existing theory can't reach or prove impossible, and some people use it to make breakthroughs, such as "understanding the language of aliens". If you let him listen to what he said yesterday, will it still be the same today? "Special functions", human beings have undeveloped functions, but you have them and others should have them. Why do you have them? "Anti-gravity machine", take it out for experts to check. Inconvenient. Then you can manipulate it in front of everyone. Is it true?/You don't say. All these things are mixed with normal scientific exploration and grandstanding. Anyway, I am a scientist. Moreover, many scientific theories have gone through hardships before they are made public. Pseudoscience exploited this loophole. You opposed him, but he plausibly said that you persecuted him.

In short, everything in the name of science, rather than the reality of science, is pseudoscience, often related to personal interests, just a beautiful dress put on by a liar. Not objective, unpredictable, not universal, can not stand the argument. There are too many far-fetched elements, and science and every basis can stand re-inspection.

Science is still a kind of spirit, which requires us to look at problems objectively and tolerate failures in scientific exploration. However, pseudoscience is one-sided, self-centered and cannot tolerate any doubts from others. To oppose pseudoscience, we must oppose doing other things in the name of science under the banner of science, dare not accept the truth of science and fail to come up with reasonable theories.

When we criticize pseudoscience, we can first express what is scientific spirit and show respect for science, and then analyze what is pseudoscience.

Here are some pseudoscience topics:

1. Ghost camera, infrared can take pictures and night vision. Some people say that they invented a camera to take pictures of ghosts. Really? Only ghosts really know. Anyway, so far no one has really taken pictures of ghosts.

2. Brain tonic, some people make a belt with magnets, saying that it can increase people's memory, but the theory makes people laugh and cry, saying that magnets can absorb knowledge or change brain activities.

Eating space fruits is smarter and misleading. Use the variation of space seeds to make an article. But astronauts are still astronauts when they come back from space.

There are absolutely no aliens in the universe. How did you know? People who say such things are more dangerous. Science needs to be explored, and everything that has not been proved can be explored again. But pseudoscience often goes too far. It can be seen here that science and pseudoscience are really a difficult topic to explain. Perhaps, for children, this topic is a bit too profound.

The above is for your reference.