Kingston hacker fury series memory 3200 or 3200?

The answer is from IT-related majors who are familiar with the identification and analysis of IT and computer hardware-related products.

When all the parameters are basically the same, only the frequency is the main difference, then the performance of 3200 will not be greatly improved compared with 2666, that is, within 20%. This difference can only be seen if you run away. In actual use, it is only a few FPS frames, and users can't feel it.

(Use the same configuration, but change the frequency of the memory. For the stability of the test, the default parameters of XMP are used, which are automatically lowered by the system to ensure the stability of the machine, which has a certain impact on the test, but it is not big, and the result is still obvious. ) The specific test comparison is as follows:

In the one-way test of AIDA64, the performance gap is about 20%.

Specific game test comparison:

A pair of 2 dollars, different resolution, the highest quality. The actual FPS is basically the same except 1 frame.

Assassin's Creed, different resolutions, highest quality. The actual average FPS is basically the same except for a few frames.

Cry of the Island, different resolutions, highest quality. If the actual average FPS is the same, the difference is 1 frame.

Summary: As long as there is no problem with the software or game optimization itself, the memory frequency has little impact on the actual game experience. So memory is not a good choice to spend a lot of money to improve performance.