Is it better to have two children together, or to have another one every five years or even longer?

I am an elder sister and have a younger brother who is seven years younger than myself.

The husband is an only child.

Both of them don't like children alone, and both want children to have their own brothers and sisters, just like my brother and I.

So the plan is to have two children.

The suggestion given by the subject's mother is that Dabao and Bauer are born together, on the grounds that it is better to bring one and two together. Take some time for yourself and start over. (I like myself, hahaha) Because my brother and I are seven years apart, my mother always said that she gave birth to my brother late. I'm married, and my brother just entered high school. If she had been born earlier, my brother would have started a family like me, and she would have been able to take care of her grandchildren and support herself earlier.

My husband is the only one, and my mother-in-law is just me and my husband, as long as I have two.

The problems facing the project now are: the first one is to have Dabao and then go to work. Dabao will grow up after 5-8 years, and he will have Erbao after attending primary school.

Second, after giving birth to Dabao, you will give birth to Erbao within 2-3 years. Then the age difference between the two babies is 2-3 years, and then they are brought up together.

The first family situation, the subject is very familiar with, because he and his brother are just such an age difference.

I don't know much about the second family People of the same age as the main body have more only children than brothers and sisters.

The subject is concerned about whether the latter will make me a full-time mother for too long (25 this year), whether it will be difficult to return to work after a few years, and whether it will be too long to adapt to the society.

Are there any children of different ages in my bosom friend's house, which belongs to the latter one I mentioned? If so, please tell me the pros and cons.

Please give some advice, thank you!

Don't give birth every once in a while, it's better to give birth together, not two or three at a time, but at least once a year.

There are four advantages:

1, diapers and baby products can be used continuously, which will save a lot of investment. Of course, if you have a son and a daughter, you can only buy clothes separately.

The first three years were very tiring. If you have parents, you can ask the couple to take care of your children for three years, just to experience the happiness of a big family.

3, after the children go to school, it is actually quite easy to pick up two children.

4. Two children can play together, without generation gap and loneliness. The younger ones will grow faster because there are teachers who are one year older!

Disadvantages mainly include:

1, test the female physique, so the first child must be delivered naturally, or it is better to have multiple births at one time.

2, two children will compare, so things must be bought in duplicate. My family is just one year old, a man and a woman, but the children want the same things as twins.

3, occasionally there will be a world war, and neither child knows who to let, which is a headache.

Final statement:

1, the first sentence is a joke, and the answer is very serious. As for the annual birth, it does not mean that the interval is 12 months, because the annual birth is usually the spring of the previous year and the autumn and winter of the next year. Because being a husband or a wife is the most important thing.

In addition, the first-born child is generally more difficult and the most dangerous. If the birth is natural, the second child is actually fast. I have seen many second-born women in the hospital. All the second children are completed within one hour from the time the amniotic fluid is broken to the time the child is born. There are risks, but don't demonize them.