The LPL spring competition adopts the double lose system. Is this system fair to the winner FPX?

First of all, throw out my opinion. This competition system may not be so reasonable, but it is really fair.

0 1, LPL use is incomplete. First of all, there are two kinds of lose-lose system, complete lose-lose and incomplete lose-lose, while LPL obviously uses incomplete lose-lose system, that is, it only uses lose-lose system in the knockout stage until the two strongest teams are selected for the final, which is a decisive battle.

In fact, the double-lose system has a long history, and dota next door even adopted incomplete double-lose early in the highest event-TI event. Then why is the unique LPL system sprayed so badly? Because many people think that the advantage of FPX as a winner group is too small.

In the incomplete lose-lose system, the big score between the loser group and the winner group is actually 1: 1, but the result is that the loser group won the final championship. Many people think this is unfair, so it is necessary to add some extra advantages to the winners.

02. It is difficult to quantify the advantages of the winner. So, does FPX have any additional advantages as a winner? Of course, otherwise, there will be teams deliberately falling into the loser group. For reference, S5 was the "Oscar Night" of IG and LGD.

First of all, as the winner of the winner group, FPX missed a BO5 game, which objectively reduced the risk of being eliminated. You know, FPX and EDG, RNG and EDG are all 3: 2, which shows that the strength gap between the three teams is really not that big.

Secondly, FPX has more advantages in tactical reserve. BO5' s talk was more or less like this, but it did expose many problems of RNG. After all, I can't say that people are still hiding tricks at 3:2. FPX has two more days than RNG to arrange targeted tactics.

Third, FPX has psychological advantages. This is easy to understand. You just got beaten by me 3-0. Why should I be afraid of you?

Finally, FPX has the priority to choose the position. This is the real benefit. The winning rate of the blue side is ridiculously high.

In addition to the finals, there are 44 small games in the playoffs of LPL Spring Tournament, of which 28 were won by the blue side, with a winning percentage of 63.6%. 16 semi-finals, blue side 10 wins, with a winning rate of 62.5%; In the playoffs of LCK next door, 18 games, the blue team won 1 1 game, with a winning percentage of 6 1. 1 1%. It can be said that in this playoffs, the advantage of the blue side is really great.

In addition to the above advantages, the winner group of dota next door also has a physical advantage, that is, the finals of the loser group are played on the same day. Of course, before the ti finals, it was BO3, and only the finals were BO5. This is doomed that LPL can't learn as it does now. After all, the tragedy of BO 10 is still in sight.

So many people put forward a compromise plan, that is, the loser group finals will be held on the first day and the finals will be held on the second day, which not only retains the physical advantage of the winner group, but also does not harm the health of the players.

However, such a competition system is actually unreasonable. If nothing else, if FPX can really choose between Resurrection A and physical strength advantage, I think they will definitely choose Resurrection A. People think it is acceptable only because this method next door has been used for many years, and it is a good method emotionally.

There is no other meaning to say so much, but how much advantage the winner group should have is really a difficult question to answer. Anyway, some people will spray it.

03. But I still think this is a fair competition system. Why? Because it is still a competition system based on strength and equal opportunities for all participating teams.

Some people say "FPX 3:4 RNG, but RNG finally won", which seems a bit rash to me. It's not a round of competition, but the results can be added up. In this way, RNG also wants to increase the results of the regular season. It's all Spring Festival travel rush anyway.

The competition system can only be relatively fair forever, and there is no absolutely fair competition system. After all, the irrationality of LPL competition system is not only in the finals.

For example, why don't regular season champions have any advantages? Don't say anything about going to the semifinals. You know, it's a small probability that the regular season champion won't make it to the semi-finals. As the champion of the regular season, RNG even has disadvantages. You know, the playoffs are a new version. Other teams can find version answers in the game, while RNG can only learn in isolation. They can't even book a training match or even play RANK, because other high-end professional players are also playing the playoffs. The first time I played FPX, I was in a really bad state, which doinb himself said in the live broadcast.

Then why doesn't anyone spray this? Because everyone's focus is not here.

This double defeat is actually not the "resurrection A" that many people say, but the big move of the old man of time, which is limited by time. You don't have to say I didn't give you a big set, do you?

In a word, the game is over and the result has been decided. Let's congratulate RNG and hope it can get good results in the next game.