Website of Suzhou Public Security Bureau

I had a dispute during the transaction on May 24, 2020 (the other party was indefensible) and was harassed, abused, threatened, intimidated and bombarded by SMS. I called the police as early as 25th 1 10, and was assigned to the Guoxiang Police Station in Wuzhong District, Suzhou. However, there are serious problems in the handling of policemen in Guoxiang Police Station.

1. In the absence of conclusive evidence, listen to the other party's words, make preconceptions, jump to conclusions, abuse their powers, make threats, and do harm to their body, mind and reputation. At about 3 pm on the 28th, a policeman called me and asked me if I was harassing a man named Cao with wall climbing software. I don't know, I said that there was sufficient evidence to prove that I violated xxx law, and I was forced to be summoned to cooperate with the investigation the next day. My attitude is very intense. Finally, it was found that the evidence provided by the other party was only the call list printed by the operator, which could not prove that I made the call, and the police had no power to "summon". On the 29th, another policeman called me and said, "The evidence of the other side is very hard", "All the evidence points to you", "You wrote, directed and acted the SMS bombing record you can provide", "You know it yourself" and "Don't go your own way, otherwise xxxxx". The end result is just bluffing and throwing dirty water for no reason.

2. Different informants in similar situations are treated differently, with double standards and obvious and blatant prejudice and cover-up. After I called the police twice and reported the situation twice, the answers I got were "The other party didn't break the law, so we can't handle it", "We can't listen to your side of the story and check the situation with the other party rashly", "You can't prove that the news was sent by the other party" and "What the other party said was just angry words". After the other party reported the case on the 28th, he immediately called me to "convict" and forced me to "summon"; The details of the call provided by the other party are "hard evidence", while the short message bombing records I showed them are "so-called evidence", which I wrote, directed and performed; I'm not sure that the message I received was sent by the other party, but I firmly believe that the phone call I received was from me. The tone and attitude of the two sides are very different, and the listening is obviously biased, which is unfair and just. The other party claims to be "inside the government system" and enjoys privileges. It is likely that he is a member of the public security system. So I have reason to suspect that there is intentional favoritism and shielding. It is self-evident to just investigate the identity of the other party.

3. Ignore my report and let it go. Call the police on the 25 th and truthfully report the situation to the on-site auxiliary police. The other party has threatened my personal safety, but no one contacted me to inform me of the progress and follow-up except someone called on the 27th to ask whether the other party would continue to harass. Judging from the recording of the 28 th police calling me, I have every reason to believe that he doesn't know the ins and outs of the incident, doesn't know what case I reported, and probably doesn't even know that I called the police. It is also possible that I didn't contact the other party to verify my harassment until I called me on the 28th. In this sense, on the contrary, I would like to thank the opposite party for reporting the case to the Guoxiang police station, so that the situation I reflected was handled slightly by the way.

4. The judging basis is simple and sloppy, with strange ideas and extremely unprofessional. In addition to insisting that I harassed the other party and directed myself without definite evidence, one of the elderly policemen even said, "You are highly educated and good at arguing, which is not credible." "Look, the other party's phone is turned off, it must be that you harassed me." "You have a personality problem, so you have an argument with others." I can't believe these words came from the mouth of a people's policeman in 2020. It seems that I am still living in the Qing Dynasty based on subjective prejudice and feelings. It is suggested that the police in Guoxiang Police Station can set up a stall to tell fortune, and besides calculating personality, they can also calculate the date of birth.

5. The information is not open and transparent, extremely sensitive, habitually shirking responsibility and fooling informants. It is very suspicious whether the other party cooperated with the investigation or took the initiative to report the case to the door on the 28th, who accepted my report at the beginning, when I first contacted the other party, and so on. When I asked the police how to collect more favorable evidence, I even said, "I don't know, you know better than me"? The inconsistent response turned out to be "you have a problem understanding"? The response to the case inquiry is "Don't worry about it" and "We police don't need to tell you what to do"? And hung up many times or deliberately did not answer the phone.

I am open and aboveboard, and I know right from wrong. I welcome the other party to file an investigation and reserve the right to pursue it according to law, but I refuse all forms of slander, slander and intimidation. Adults should be responsible for their words and deeds, and the people's police should be comprehensive, objective, rigorous, fair and open. Judging from this experience, I will try to avoid dealing with garbage people in the future and try to avoid causing trouble to the Guoxiang police station in Wuzhong District. Besides wasting a lot of time, energy and feelings, without substantial help, you will be splashed with dirty water in turn? .

To paraphrase you, you "know" what is the truth and what you are doing.