Why are fortune tellers accurate? Can there be scientific proof that there is really superstition?

Why are fortune tellers accurate? That's not true. It should be said that it is not accurate.

The argument between science and superstition is too complicated. I have some ideas for your reference.

First, modern science has gradually developed from what people used to call "superstition". It can be said that without ancient superstitions, there would be no modern technology.

Second, superstition is an ancient science.

Third, because science has discovered ancient science with the progress of the times, there are many things that are not wrong, including "fortune telling". Now we call those wrong ancient sciences "superstitions", which is very good.

Fourth, there are many mistakes in modern science, such as drugs "Berberine" and "Lianmycin". These people are forgiven now and are not called "superstitions". It's strange, because the inventors of those drugs are all "great scientists" now, some of them are not dead, and no one dares to say. The conscience of scientists is crushed by interests.

Fifth, there are many guys who don't pretend to understand. They are "bricks" dressed as "scientists". In order to fight against dissidents, they classify everything they don't understand as "superstition".

Sixth, I think "superstition" itself is a very derogatory term, which means "you must firmly believe that what you don't know is correct" and you can't use it to interpret anything.

Finally, your question: "Can there be scientific proof that there is really superstition?"

This problem does not need to be proved, nor can modern science, because it is a fact. No matter how you prove it and what the conclusion is, it will not affect the objective existence! However, the existence of superstitious statements or ancient scientific conclusions does not mean that the correctness of those conclusions or statements will eventually be eliminated from the perspective of development. However, we should correctly evaluate its historical role and contribution. Use an inappropriate metaphor to understand: most people think that the Red Army, the Eighth Route Army, the New Fourth Army and the People's Liberation Army are not afraid of sacrifice, they have fought against Chiang Kai-shek bandits, resisted the United States and surpassed Japan ... and made great contributions to the country and the people. But if someone says, "What a great contribution, a bunch of idiots, then be superstitious. With so many people dead, why don't you fight with' atomic bombs',' aircraft carriers' and' missiles' to completely destroy the enemy and win." Are you ridiculous or not? ...