Hong Xiuquan issued regulations to make people's grievances boil. What changes did Yang make that people readily accepted?

Hong Xiuquan promulgated the Regulations on Governing the People. This treaty is unequal, and all the benefits belong to the heavenly king, thus causing panic among the people. After Yang knew it, he reissued the "Four People's Condolences" and told the people that their property belonged only to them to appease the people.

After the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom occupied Nanjing, Hong Xiuquan promulgated a Regulation on Governing the People. The main idea is that all the land and cultivated land in the world belong to the king of heaven, that is, * * *. Even the grain produced by these cultivated lands belongs to Tianwang, who will distribute it in proportion to the population after collecting it. Adults get 150 kilograms of grain a year, while minors get only half. The shop opened by the businessman is also owned by Tianwang, and the money earned is also owned by Tianwang.

As soon as Hong Xiuquan's regulations came out, the people began to panic. This belongs to all aspects of control, and the lives of ordinary people will definitely be difficult in the future. Because of this regulation, Nanjing began to fall into chaos and even became an excuse for the Qing army to crack down on the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom. Yang was not in Nanjing at that time, and Hong Xiuquan promulgated this regulation without consulting him. After learning about this, Yang issued new regulations to appease the people of Nanjing, warning them not to be afraid and promising them that they would not infringe on their property.

Later, after discussion, the "celestial eye system" was promulgated, which was similar to the effect of the "Regulations on Governing the People", but it was better to say that the personal king was changed to heaven. The former means that you can keep the share you need and then hand over the rations. The latter means that you can give it to Tianwang first, and then Tianwang will distribute it uniformly. In fact, the meaning is the same, but the statement is different.