There's a saying ... advise and don't advise to leave, understand? What do you mean?

In the traditional (unified) marriage relationship in China, there is a saying that if the husband and wife disagree or the marriage is not harmonious, there is a saying that:

It is better to break a marriage than to tear down ten temples.

The general meaning of this sentence is that it is considered immoral to tear down the temple, but it is not a particularly serious mistake.

The behavior of those who alienate their marital status is considered a vicious incident that undermines justice. It is a crime against humanity to be angry when one's wife is separated. You are no more guilty of tearing down ten temples than tearing down a marriage.

This is mainly due to China people's concept of harmony (unity) in communication, and they only do good things and don't do bad things.

The temples here refer to Buddhist temples in China, which are considered as symbols of kindness and morality. If someone vandalizes, they will be angered.

Marriage is considered to be a match made in heaven and sacred. Everyone should maintain the sanctity of marriage. If there is a saboteur, it will be regarded as an act of destroying heaven and earth, and its crime far exceeds the act of tearing down ten temples.

The human marriage, which originated from the consanguineous reproductive genetic system of people on the Loess Plateau 500,000 years ago, changed the consanguineous reproductive genetic state of the primitive matriarchal clan, which is the first sign of the transformation of human beings from a primitive animal behavior society to a scientific, civilized and rational behavior society and is the need of human survival and development.

Therefore, in a normal marriage, it is kind to persuade marriage to be harmonious, and it is immoral to persuade separation.

============

Solemn reputation:

This answer is the original answer of the respondent of this question.

If you are suspected of "plagiarism" in the "high quality audit", please give a model of "plagiarism" as evidence. The respondent of this question is willing to take it to court to prove his innocence.

In this regard, the author of the original answer to this question solemnly declares.

Original answer to this question Author: We want to know

============

Solemn protest:

The original answer to this question, the author, "Baidu knows" in the "high-quality audit" for unconfirmed cases:

"? Revision suggestion

Answer suspected plagiarism

Please give your own original answer, don't copy the existing answer. "

A solemn protest is an unreasonable provocation and personal injury to the author of the original answer to this question. This kind of behavior is shameful framing and slander.

In this regard, the author of the original answer to this question lodged a solemn protest and reserved the right to sue in court.

Original answer to this question Author: We want to know