Jane Eyre's first child to Rochester was ().

Jane Eyre's first child to Rochester was (). The original is not written.

Jane Eyre is an autobiographical novel by British woman writer Charlotte Brontexq. The work tells the story of an English woman who became an orphan from an early age, constantly pursued freedom and dignity, persisted in herself, and finally achieved happiness through various hardships. The novel shows the ups and downs of the love experience of the hero and heroine, praises getting rid of all old customs and prejudices, and successfully shapes a female image who dares to resist and strive for freedom and equal status.

Mr. Jane Eyrochester lived with a servant because he became blind and lame to save his wife.

In Jane Eyre, Rochester tests Jane Eyre. At Thornfield Manor's party, Rochester tried Jane Eyre by playing an old lady who can tell fortune.

What is Rochester's age in Jane Eyre? In Jane Eyre, most of them describe Jane Eyre 18- 19 years old. It is mentioned in the book that Rochester told Jane Eyre that he was 20 years older than her. It can be concluded that Rochester is about 39-40 years old, and then they get married and get together. As time goes on, their age will increase. . .

What was Jane Eyre's first impression of Rochester? Jane Eyre is a little surprised at the temperament and style of Rochester when she doesn't know his identity.

After that, the first impression is eccentric, fickle and rude.

In Jane Eyre, Rochester's confession to Jane is Jane! I used to be proud of my strength, but now? Recently, I began to blame myself, to repent, and sometimes to pray. Last Monday night, I sat by the open window. I was expecting you, Jane! I painfully and humbly asked God if I had been so painful, miserable and tortured for long enough. All my inner wishes involuntarily jumped out of my mouth and became these words-'Jane! Jane. Jane "

If you mean Luo's confession when he later returned to Rochester, who was blind and lame, that's all.

Who will love Jane Eyre except Rochester? This question is difficult to answer. I can only reluctantly answer as follows:

First of all, if we are still telling stories, we can make up a person to love Jane Eyre. A rich man like Rochester can't find a good woman in his class. Or, more reasonably, a kind and knowledgeable person in her class, such as St. John, but this story is not as contradictory as "marrying a rich man"

Secondly, if we are realistic, we should first think about whether Rochester's love for Jane is a very reliable thing. It has been set in the book that Rochester has no parents, relatives or friends to exert influence to stop such degrading things, which objectively makes this feeling very convenient and reasonable. But on the other hand, has Rochester really never met a kind and beautiful woman of the same class for so many years? He should be read by countless people. Is a woman of good birth necessarily domineering, stupid and vicious? This is far-fetched. I think this book also shows a little (only a little) prejudice against the upper class. Of course, it is not that people can't see the good fate before, but it is also a small probability to admit that Rochester was blank for so many years before meeting Jane Eyre.

Third, whether the love between Rochester and Jane can last in reality. The author himself is a good example. If I remember correctly, she used to be a tutor in a big family, and there was love between her and her master, but this Romanesque entanglement didn't last long in reality, and she seemed to have left there; However, it has been permanently sublimated in this masterpiece. It can be seen that this love is unforgettable for the author. But what about my superior lover I don't know? Let's try to think about it. It is reported in the newspaper that a rich man has fallen in love with his family tutor. This doesn't sound like a touching story. Although it may be pure and touching, it is more likely to go the other way. Therefore, it is easy to understand the general opposition in public opinion (such as Mrs. Fairfax). This is a revolt against Rochester and a pressure on Jane Eyre. In addition, it is what we call the right question. The similarity and understanding of two hearts cannot erase the differences in living habits, class consciousness and other issues. Differences create contradictions. This is also an obstacle. Even Jane Eyre said (as a child) that she didn't like the poor, which was not a simple prejudice, but the instinct of her class at that time. Jane Eyre is knowledgeable, well-educated and virtuous, but she is still poor. Rochester can dress his poor bride like a flower bed, but he can't bridge the gap between classes.

Personal point of view. Besides, I like Jane Eyre very much. From the first day of junior high school, it was a simplified version, and then the original version. At that time, I watched it dozens of times, and the pages of their separate plots were all wet and wrinkled. But at that time, I often thought that if Rochester met Jane's two cousins first, he would fall in love with Jane, which seemed better. I was afraid to think deeply at that time. I'm afraid such a beautiful standard love is flawed in my mind.

I still like it, but from an adult's point of view, I think it is still a novel, with more idealistic elements. The author's own utopia has more elements. Of course, there is no need to be so realistic, so it will be beautiful. Love is wonderful and right; A kind and contented person, what kind of fate, who he loves and who he loves, will be happy.

By the way, the version published by Yilin is really good. I didn't understand it before, but now I feel really good and true.

Motto of love.

Did Jane Eyre finally save Mr. Rochester in Jane Eyre? Yes, the redemption of the soul

How much older is Mr. Rochester than Jane Eyre in Jane Eyre? In Jane Eyre (70th edition), Rochester said that he was 20 years older than Jane Eyre.

"Jane, will you marry me?

"Yes, sir." "A cripple who is 20 years older than you, you have to wait for him."

"Yes, sir"

"Really, Jane?"

"Exactly, sir."