In the TV series Kangxi Dynasty, some people say that Chen's acting skills are overdone. How to evaluate this?

I don't know when it started. Once someone questions Chen's acting skills, he will say that he doesn't understand at all. Yes, I am an ordinary audience, and I don't know how to perform, but I feel very uncomfortable when I see his Kangxi. I will try my best to be well-founded and get rid of the suspicion of indiscriminate spraying.

When Chen appeared, Kangxi 19 years old, and the actor was almost 45 years old. The gap between middle-aged and young people really exists, especially those dramas with dubbing. To tell the truth, if the voice tone is still young, I don't think it is possible to watch that part at all.

First, as an emperor, his behavior in the court was too casual.

Chaohui is a ceremony, not just a conversation, but a solemn ceremony! Besides, as an emperor, if you don't sit unsmiling in front of his ministers, you should at least have some spirit. However, before sitting in court, Chen always looked thoughtful and sighed slowly and inexplicably, and then he said, ah, stand up; Although I am not too casual in the dragon chair, I always sit sideways and talk without looking at people, so every move always gives people the illusion that I don't want to pay attention. From this point of view, it is not as good as the young Kangxi playing Rowen. In private, it is even more serious, especially in the episodes of the Imperial Capital. The barrage said that he "this emperor likes Ge You to lie so much." A few days ago, some netizens criticized Wallace Huo's Qianlong for not being like an emperor. One of them is because he sat or not. I think it makes sense.

Second, the tone of voice is too middle-aged.

Especially when criticizing officials, "look up!" That look is just like my dad seeing that I made a lot of mistakes in my exam paper. Exactly the same! I am basically the same age as Kangxi in the play, but Kangxi plays like a father, which really doesn't make sense. At the same time, many times it is obvious that he is in a meeting with a group of people, but judging from his mouth opening and movement range, he doesn't look like talking to the minister, but like chatting in private, looking lazy. Every time I see him frowning slightly at Minister Kan Kan, I think of my dad and his colleagues' fatigue and embarrassment at lunch while talking about work while smoking (don't take it out on ministers, you are a mad dog, that's what you said after you grew a beard, this fatigue is more after dubbing, but it's not so discordant when you match your age), but the dubbing is clear and correct.

In short, the age gap is too big, which leads to a serious sense of disobedience. I can accept that the emperor is more mature than ordinary people, but Chen has nothing to do with the last actor. In fact, the actor of young Kangxi was almost 35 years old, so he was not so disobedient. People play naughty ("I'm going to start playing!") I must ride a horse and mark it. I want to be serious (I'd rather die than let you succeed), and I want bad luck ("Ah-hum! Retreat from the DPRK! " ), because 16 years old is like this. So I think if the director divides the play into three parts, it is better to let the last one be performed in Pingsan Francisco, and then Chen will start from Taiwan Province without dubbing.

Kangxi is an emperor through the ages, and Chen plays the domineering role of Kangxi, showing the unique temperament of the emperor.

Some people say that the brown Kangxi is better than Chen's, and Chen's Kangxi has played this feeling. I have to admit that Mr. Jiao Huang's performance of Kangxi is also incisive, but Mr. Jiao Huang plays Kangxi of Yongzheng Dynasty. It can be said that The First Hero belongs to him. Teacher Jiao Huang plays Kangxi in his later years. He didn't play Kangxi's How to Destroy Ao Bai and Three Chops. But he played Kangxi when Jiuzi took office, so Kangxi didn't need much at this time. After all, Jiuzi took office in front of his sons. Too much domineering and emperor anger will make people feel that Kangxi is too ruthless in front of his son. He is a cold-blooded animal, and Jiao Huang teacher Kangxi just explained these perfectly. In the face of the state that Jiuzi seized office, Kangxi should not be a heartless person to his son and the country. Therefore, Jiao Huang's performance in the play is steady, sophisticated and patient.

Kangxi dynasty, Kangxi is Kangxi's life. From the very beginning, sourdrang queen listened to politics, and later, with the help of Xiao Zhuang, he brought down Ao Bai, razed Taiwan Province for three transgressions and five times, collected peace in Gerdan, and expelled the tsar. It can be said that this is to celebrate Kangxi's eternal emperor, so Kangxi in this film has changed from reckless Kangxi to calm and sophisticated Kangxi. And Mr. Chen just performed some of them. After repeated failures, Wu Sangui rose up and rebelled. Kangxi felt cheated, teased, humiliated and flustered, so Mr. Chen performed. And when I learned that my son was captured by Mr. Gedan Chen, that passage could be used as a textbook. Facing my son's feeling of hating iron and not turning it into steel, I feel very real as an audience. Then I went to face Gedan's son, his own grandson, the son of his enemy, that kind of love and hate, a very special feeling, and Chen Ba's interpretation was particularly vivid. See also in Kangxi, Li Guangdi, Pearl and Suo Tu Tu. In the paper, it is written that Suo Tu Tu tried to collude with Prince Zhu San to kill himself. That kind of anger, anger is nothing else, he wants to be emperor forever, he can't admit that a monarch mainly kills himself, so he is angry, and Chen screams hysterically, which is a classic. At the grand banquet, the sense of heroism, pride and pride can be said to be Chen's perfect interpretation of Kangxi's life.

I totally agree with the view that "ten smiles are accompanied", and "burnt yellow" plays "Kangxi". Generally speaking, Chen's "Kangxi Dynasty" strongly shows his "housekeeping skills". In the first half of the TV series, I think the story of the young "Kangxi" is more vivid, and in the second half, "Chen" takes over as "Kangxi", which is another flavor. There are many plots that are too "slightly artificial", and the scenes are grand and waste a lot of space ... I remember that the TV series "The Granary in the World" is trustworthy and worth watching, and the cast is no less than "Kangxi Dynasty". The plot belongs to the category of "fighting corruption and promoting honesty", and its educational significance is in place.

Chen is one of the most influential actors in China. He has acted in many classic TV dramas, but the most memorable one is Kangxi Dynasty. This TV series has been filmed for many years, but it still has a large audience and should be watched again every year.

It is because of Chen's excellent acting that this TV series can become a classic among the classics. Even many people say that there was no Kangxi after Chen. Why do you say that? In fact, this is Chen's strong point.

When we watch TV series, on the one hand, the story inside and on the other hand, its authenticity are not enough. In fact, the most important thing is the actor's acting skills. Only when the actors play their roles well can this TV series touch the hearts of the audience. A large part of the reason why we watched Kangxi Dynasty is because we went to see Kangxi played by Chen.

Nowadays, there are many dog blood TV dramas, but few people respect history. Kangxi played by Chen is exactly what many people think of as Kangxi. Chen played well. What's so good about it? In fact, there are mainly the following aspects.

Chen's Kangxi is an original. The emperors we used to see were often sitting in a shaky position, or listening to ministers talking about platforms in the Golden Palace, or approving the throne in a well-dressed manner. Perhaps in the minds of these actors, the emperor should look like the emperor.

Moreover, they also believe that the emperor should always sit still. Chen did the opposite. So in this play, we see the emperor, who sometimes lies in bed, sometimes leans on a chair, and sometimes even squats in that place like ordinary people. In fact, the emperor is a human being, just like ordinary people. We haven't seen Kangxi, but Chen gave us the impression that Kangxi was like this.

Another point is that Kangxi, played by Chen, has a particularly long time span. He played Kangxi's life, from youth to middle age to old age. He played all the time by himself, which was very good. The charm of youth, the calmness and ability of middle age, and even the rickets of the elderly are particularly good. Especially in old age, the way Chen walks, you can't imagine, this is an old man played by a middle-aged man. Chen perfectly interpreted these three periods with solid acting skills.

Furthermore, it should be the temperament of an emperor, which can best be expressed in every move, word and deed, that is, the spirit of an emperor. It is simple to play a role well, but it is really not easy to play this momentum well.

This, Chen Ye did, he should have this kind of temperament, after all, so far, we haven't seen how the real emperor should speak and record all his feelings in a notebook, so this is a difficult problem for Chen's explanation. But Chen is Chen after all. He did a good job and never met Kangxi, but you will think this is Kangxi. Perhaps this is the highest state of an actor.

After so many years, we have seen many different versions of Kangxi, but the more so, the more we like Chen's Kangxi. As many people say, there is no Kangxi after Chen. In fact, this statement is really right.

Hello, everyone, I'm (Beiying Theater). I like watching plays and movies. I like watching TV plays since I was a child. I admire those who have good acting skills. They can integrate themselves into the play and show their good works to our audience. I also admire those writers who write film and television dramas (such as Qiong Yao and Gu Long). They can not only write well, but also play a literary role in novels. These people have written an idea and a social background, which makes the film and television drama close to life and human nature. In view of this question raised by the subject, the following are my sharing and views:

There were many classic scenes in Kangxi dynasty, for example, few people paid attention to such scenes. It was when Kangxi was ready to abolish San Francisco that Mr. Tu Tu persuaded Kangxi not to do so.

Chen is a very acting actor. Chen once played Kangxi in Kangxi Dynasty. In one scene, Kangxi reprimanded the minister. In the whole clip, Chen did it in one go. Such superb acting skills have made countless people admire.

The above is my sharing and opinion. In my opinion, the film civilization industry is progressing, and the film is becoming the center of social civilization. In the column of civilized entertainment, movies have attracted more and more attention. The transformation of China's film industry has been further accelerated, and China's film industry has been internationalized. At that time, China's overall economy was expanding, and now it is in line with the world, and its role in the development of the world economy can not be underestimated. Then, with the rapid development of China's economic era, China's films will also show a different and colorful appearance.

Finally, I wish you all happy watching TV series, summing up your life in the process of watching, and making your life more and more prosperous. I also wish we can have more good TV plays in the future. Thank you!

Say it's over! I don't know from which angle it was analyzed. Is Chen's fault or Kangxi's fault? If it's Chen's fault, who is better to call? As an audience, it is right to expect more from actors. As an actor, it is very rare to get 80% recognition, so I think someone will say it! Can't ask everyone in the country to like it?

Teacher Chen is an old joke! Why is Kangxi's performance not excessive?

First, first of all, we should pay attention to state affairs, punish Ao Bai, recover Taiwan Province Province, make peace with San Francisco, and fight for it! Anything can split the country!

Second, balance factional struggle! Since ancient times, rulers have been most afraid of dealing with civil servants. Once Kangxi, talented people came forth in large numbers! Sony, Suoetu, Nalan Mingzhu, Yao Qisheng, Shi Lang, Zhang, Li Guangdi,,, ... None of them is an idle generation!

Third, Lao Kangxi faced the smooth inheritance of the Qing Empire.

Judging from these three points, Mr. Chen's acting skills are just right!

The scorched emperor lived Kangxi, and Tang Guoqiang lived the emperor's pragmatism and domineering. Chen played an unfathomable emperor, which was similar to Chen's, showing the appearance of being an emperor.

It's too much to say that Chen played Kangxi. What is the standard? Art itself is higher than life. I think Chen's Kangxi is just right. Who has seen the majesty of Emperor Kangxi, Emperor Kangxi of Chen, can only let future generations know Emperor Kangxi better and make him more mysterious. His performance can only make Emperor Kangxi more radiant and make people admire him more.