Why didn't Zhouyi Shushu get national recognition?

Many people like to admire Zhouyi, which covers the deepest mystery of human civilization and predicts the changes of the world for thousands of years. This is an abstruse science that human beings have not yet understood. Others denounced it as superstition and mocked those who believed it still lived in the Middle Ages. These two views are so opposite, which is why your proposition can't be established. Zhouyi is not a science (if this science refers to modern science). Although it contains profound scientific principles, it can't be quantified and can't be experimented on a large scale (please note that it is a large scale).

The Book of Changes is divided into four parts, the latter two parts are regarded as superstitions by most scholars, and it has been like this since the ancients (such as Wang Bi scanning elephants, such as Er Zhu Cheng Xi). The Book of Changes is interpreted with meaning, regardless of the part occupied by elephants. You know, Zhouyi is first and foremost a book of divination. As mentioned in the historical materials of the Spring and Autumn Period, Zhouyi is often used for divination. How to understand the essence of Zhouyi without mentioning Xiang Zhan? The Book of Changes is iconology at first, that is, the formation of the image of nature mentioned in the Book of Changes. It is believed that all changes can be observed through images. Its essential idea is holographic theory, that is, if all changes have occurred or will occur, then it will be reflected in everything. To put it simply, whether you ate rice or noodles yesterday can be seen through the model of Zhouyi, because it will be reflected in a certain divination, such as the sea divination representing noodles and the Kun divination representing rice. If you ask this question, it means that you ate noodles yesterday. Is it idealized? If there is no divination, how to judge? Furthermore, if I just played with a leaf when you ask this question, I should be able to tell what you are eating from the state of the leaf (such as texture, such as variety, such as homophonic, such as color, etc.). ) According to Zhouyi theory. Without divination, you are eating noodles. Did I do something wrong? The difference between ordinary people who are experts here is that even if there is no intuitive image of the fork on the six-inch, for example, if it deviates from the six-inch, experts can still accurately judge that you are eating noodles, which is very demanding for forecasters. Let him find clues that can infer the answer from all seemingly unrelated images, such as today's dry branches, the time, location and clothes when you ask questions, and let the forecaster conclude that you are eating noodles.

?