The beautiful woman was caught stealing and offered to pay for the meat. After the incident, she felt that she had suffered a loss and reported it to the police. Did the store rape?

Not rape. In real life, there is such a real event. The supermarket owner found that the beautiful woman often stole things from her own supermarket, and directly asked her to pay compensation according to the price after being arrested, but the beautiful woman said that she had no money and took the initiative to put forward the idea of meat compensation to the supermarket owner. The supermarket owner saw that the beautiful woman had no money and was beautiful, so he agreed.

Who knows that after a while, the beauty felt that she had suffered a loss, and threatened the supermarket owner to give herself some money to compensate, or warned him of rape. After the supermarket owner refused, the beauty called the police. In the end, the supermarket owner was fined for pc detention, while the beauty was detained on suspicion of theft, prostitution and extortion.

To a certain extent, beautiful women suffer from ignorance of the law, and finally lose their wives and soldiers. A beautiful woman stealing in a supermarket is stealing. Offering meat compensation afterwards is prostitution, and threatening supermarket owners with compensation is extortion. The behavior of the supermarket owner belongs to the illegal behavior of pc and does not constitute rape.

Because rape refers to the illegal and criminal act of using violence, threats and other means to force sexual relations with women against their will. The supermarket owner didn't force him to have sex with a beautiful woman, so his behavior is not rape, but it is illegal for a pc to have a physical transaction with a beautiful woman.

To some extent, both of them are basically stupid people who have done absurd things and been punished by law. The behavior of a beautiful woman is culpable of stealing. As for the behavior of the supermarket owner, it is caused by lust. Obviously the victim, but in the end he was detained and fined for lust.

If the supermarket owner has a family, his loss will be even greater, and his family and marriage are likely to break up, because the supermarket owner is a typical social death. It is estimated that people around him will know his "heroic deeds" after watching the news. Therefore, we must not think that something is profitable. It's probably a sugary poison, which makes you feel sweet first, and then makes you feel dead. Nothing for nothing. Don't be too smart, don't be too smart.