How to evaluate Zhou Libo's behavior of forcing girls to recognize their relatives in China Dream Show?

See this in Weibo, feel incredible. Never heard of people who can't find their relatives. Society gives great love and warmth. I have never heard of sacrificing my happiness and principles in order to show a kind of "great love" to the society. Then I went to see the original program, which was really angry and funny.

Let's start with Zhou Libo. In that episode of the program, Zhou Libo actually had an obvious intention from beginning to end, that is, he wanted his sister in the program to recognize relatives. From the beginning, he could see that every word was paving the way, suggesting and seizing the moral high ground. It started with induction. Later, when I saw my sister's resolute attitude under the stage, I asked her what her dream was. At this time, her purpose was already very strong, and then I let her go on stage. At this time, my sister has fallen into an unfavorable situation of humiliating.

Sorry, I seldom watch TV, so I don't know who that Cheng Lin is. At this moment, Cheng Lin jumped out and began to tell his story. At first, Comrade Zhou Libo was worried that Colin's teammates would divert the audience's attention too much, so he interrupted his teammates frequently, trying to force the parties to submit to the "recognize relatives" incident. When Cheng Lin explained that his child was adopted, Zhou Libo decisively picked up the shame of the Virgin thrown by his teammates and began to carry out moral attacks on the parties. First of all, he put on a top hat for his customers in the name of Zhou Libo's social love. When he learned that the client had a son, the conversation turned to the persecution education demonstration.

Students who have watched the program should be able to see that the following program group invited their biological parents inexplicably and abruptly. Zhou Libo saw that the client was indifferent to the "social love" outlined by himself in the state of being constantly attacked, and he was tough on the weakness of the client, that is, the "educational demonstration" of his son. When all parties made compromises out of quality and careful choice, Zhou Libo created a kind of "finally doing a great good thing for the country, the people and the society!" As well as the attitude that "as long as everyone pays a little love, the world will become a better world", promote the development of the situation in time and completely let the parties submit. There is nothing to say about Zhou Libo's later performance.

The above is to restore Zhou Libo's performance in this program. As for Zhou Libo's previous deeds and behaviors, here is a comment: a clown with poor acting skills.

Briefly comment on the client. Actually, I admire her. First of all, she is generous and not supercilious in front of the camera, has her own principles, and can calmly face Zhou Libo's confusing "moral doubts" one after another. On the question of recognizing her sister, she has given herself a very sincere and sincere tolerance. Finally, when Zhou Libo tried to blackmail her son for no reason, he was very angry and showed high quality. Finally, he compromised with the program group and finished the farce. In my opinion, this is the best way to deal with a farce.

Because this topic is mainly about Zhou Libo, I don't want to say anything else.

Its logic is relatively clear. The program group took the initiative to direct a marriage drama, and the actors were already in place. After the opening of the film, it was found that the "female host" didn't say her lines according to the script, so Zhou Libo led Cheng Lin's teammates and all the staff to "violate morality" against the female host and forced her to act according to the script.

So I said that Zhou Libo was acting. In his mind, he might be complacent about the success of the rescue.

But as an audience, I still want to say that the acting is too bad! The script is too stiff! The influence is very bad! Bad review! Report!

Oh, yes, there are three views that everyone cares about, but there is no such thing as three views here. It's just acting. The only sincere view of the party is ok. Since the program group has three views on acting, we won't discuss it.