/kloc-who are the characters in the 0/0 TV series that was "destroyed by classics"?

There are many classic film and television works in our post-80s childhood, but I don't know why these great directors always like to remake the classics, so there are many classic film and television roles.

What impressed me the most was 1, which should be the Huang Xiaoming version of Xu Wenqiang. Huang Xiaoming has no temperament of Chow Yun Fat at all, and she has to put it on abruptly, which makes her feel particularly stiff.

The second role is Wei Xiaobao played by Huang Xiaoming. In fact, Wei Xiaobao, whether it is the Tony Leung Chiu Wai version or the Jordan chan version, is particularly popular with everyone. Without the Huang Xiaoming version, Wei Xiaobao has been criticized countless times, so we can only say that his acting skills need to be improved.

The third role should be Zhu Xiaotian's version of Chu Liuxiang. I believe that no Chu Liuxiang is as indescribable as he is, and can only be described as ugly and fat.

The fourth role is the king's version of Nezha, which is simply the rural cottage version of Nezha. Personally, I think the fifth role should be the Deng Chao version of young Bao Qingtian. In fact, Zhou Jie and Lu Yi played Bao Qingtian very well. Deng Chao would be better if it weren't for their comparison.

The sixth character who ruined the classic is the swallow of crystal. Actually, Crystal also has that aura, but it's much worse than Zhao Wei. The seventh one is that Li's version is what I want to vomit most. I think many people give me the same idea, because Li is really not suitable for this role.

The eighth role is actually Huang Feihong played by Jackie Chan, because the role of Huang Feihong is only played by Jet Li in my heart.

The ninth role, Deng Chao's Dragon Slayer, to be honest, Deng Chao is really not suitable for this costume TV series. 10 is also the most unacceptable role for me, and it is the supreme treasure of Z.TAO version. I don't think people will have too many opinions on this.