Why can tennis giant finard still dominate tennis at 202 1?

First of all, objectively speaking, the progress of science and technology and the improvement of training methods have greatly extended the sports life of tennis players, especially the Big Three, which match ATP and even the top medical and training teams in the whole tennis world. Secondly, the unprecedented 20VS20VS (to be launched soon) 20 between the three giants has made the three people form an extremely benign competition. Deyo and Natto talked about it more than once in an interview. The record of the other two and their fighting spirit on the court are great motivation to keep moving forward.

Third, the Big Three all have willpower, self-control, and tennis talent (just in the right place), which is an unparalleled talent. This era is lucky, as soon as it comes out.

Fourth, long-term separation must be combined, and long-term separation must be observed. Any field will have its peak period and chaotic period. For example, WTA was ruled by God for more than 20 years in 1990s-00s, but it also fell into an embarrassing situation after 20 16. However, in the late 1990s, ATP gradually loosened the dominance of Agassi and Sang Shen, and entered a decade of chaos, during which Rios, the king of grand slam, and Gao Diao, Koda, Johnson and other meteor-like Grand Slam champions were also produced. The reign of terror of cattle people in 2004 finally broke the leaderless situation, and then ushered in the "Big Three+Bud Egg" in the past 20 years, which raised the competitive level of ATP to such an amazing peak.

Heroes emerge in troubled times, and heroes rule the world. This is the development law that will appear in any field. The terrible dominance of the Big Three also made contemporaries and the younger generation feel scared and timid before the war, which also strengthened the rule of the Big Three to some extent.

Fifth, in fact, this point has been rotten, the weakness of the post-90 s generation. In fact, this is not just the tennis world. Personally, I think it was created by the whole era. Compared with their predecessors, the post-90s generation in all fields have a little more free and independent personality. But I really don't think it's necessary to be harsh. After 90 s and 95 s, they have their own dreams and pursuits, and they will make continuous progress in setbacks. However, in ATP, the performance of four small (Messi lamp on the hip)+five small grass (strawberry FAA ruble silly Sina) is not as bad as everyone said. I am optimistic that they will become a new force for stable rule after becoming the Big Three.

Finally, I really admire the Big Three. Niu is about to turn 40 and still has a grand slam heart; After so many times when everyone thought he was going to retire due to injury, Doudou died abruptly in Phoenix in order to prolong his sports life and improve his playing style, and he is still an unshakable land god. Deyo even watched him change step by step. After the return of 20 18 Kaiser, he constantly improved his serve, ball and net, and finally came from behind and became an invincible cold return machine for all courses. We can't ignore four small efforts. The progress of the Prime Minister's hard ground is obvious to all, and now it has become the second largest hard ground after Germany and Germany. Hee hee performed best when facing the giants, and never struggled every time in the past two years because of his mental collapse; Although the lights are always weak, we can see that we have made a lot of efforts in front of the net; Tim insisted on the quarter-finals and finally won the grand slam (although he is a little lost now).

Compared with the Big Three, young people eat surprisingly well. For example, medvedev and Sisyphus all have dou with the highest elo score of less than 2,300, and 2 100 is the norm. Wei Zi is 24, Sisyphus is 23 and Medvedev is 25. Except Medvedev's career peak can be roughly equal to that of Djokovic (20 years old) in 2007 or Federer (22 years old) in 2003, the other two have either made little progress in technology or mentality in recent years (Xiao), or their career fields have remained at a level lower than that of Federer in 2002 (Sispas). What, you want to compare Sisyphus with 20-year-old Djokovic? They are 2052 and 2279, and their talent level is not a dimension at all. Now Deyo, no matter how old he is and how tight his physical strength is, can he beat his 20-year-old self with his superb ball path and excellent ball dealer?

What's more, young people nowadays are not only vegetables, but also thieves and ugly people. The unforced errors of the Big Three are all out of bounds, and the unforced errors of a group of young people are all out of bounds, and they are always out of bounds at 2-3 meters from the sideline. It can be seen that these reckless men have nothing to commend except for vigorously pumping the ball and dallying. If these people are a little angry, will a buffoon like Kierkegaard get so much praise from the outside world? The strong rise of Junior 20 17 is the shadow of the Big Three when they were young, but most of the top players in Junior 20 17 were injured, and Junior 2 was in charge of some water this season.

More importantly, Wei Zi serves much better now than when he was young. What technological progress can he see in four years? The forehand is as soft as noodles from time to time, and it is a disaster to serve from the outside corner of the area. You can't make a SLR Sispas just by the housekeeper's backhand attack. Medvedev, the grass mud horse has not made any decent achievements so far. Besides, as a 25-year-old player, do you still ask the outside world to take the standards of newcomers to demand yourself? Two Grand Slam finals, one was that the opponent was short and the other was defeated by a 34-year-old veteran. You are a Mesozoic player. You don't have a grand slam, and the venue is seriously biased. It is ridiculous to expect to monopolize the position of the next generation of ball kings. Sisyphus, the strength is really good, but relying on Sisyphus to prop up the facade of the future atp really feels a bit shabby.