The lover wanted to have sex forcibly in the car, and the woman killed her lover in despair. Does the woman belong to self-defense?

A woman and a married woman came together. The relationship between them was good at first, but then there was a contradiction. The man wants to have sex with the woman in the car, but the woman doesn't agree. In desperation, she stabbed the man to death. Is the woman defending herself? Definitely not self-defense!

It is not self-defense for a woman to stab a man.

The relationship between a woman and a man belongs to lovers. This relationship is immoral, but not illegal. Men ask for sex, but women don't agree. Men's behavior belongs to rape in the legal sense at most. Although the sentence for rape is very heavy, he is innocent, capital crime! The woman stabbed him with a knife and then killed him.

Some people say that women's behavior belongs to self-defense. Whoever said this may not know the meaning of self-defense. Self-defense refers to the act of stopping the illegal infringement on the person who is committing the illegal infringement. This concept contains five elements: the existence of tort; Infringement is in progress; The victim has a sense of autonomy; Stop the other party's infringement; It is not too much to stop this behavior.

These five conditions are indispensable. In the behavior of women stabbing men, there is obvious suspicion of excessive defense. Even if the other party has compulsive behavior, the woman's behavior not only did not stop, but also stabbed the other party to death, which obviously exceeded the necessary scope. Therefore, the woman's behavior should not belong to self-defense, but should belong to excessive defense and even illegal crime.

Some people say, why is it illegal and criminal? Think about it, two people are lovers, why does a woman have a knife in her hand? How can you stab someone without a knife? Will there be a woman's subjective intention? Deliberately use words to stimulate men, cause quarrels, and then take out a knife to stab each other to death.

Second, the woman's behavior constitutes a crime.

The woman's behavior belongs to intentional homicide, not self-defense. The crime of intentional homicide has two elements: one is intentional behavior; One is subjective intention. Intention in behavior refers to action or omission (letting the other party die). Women's behavior belongs to the former and is intentional. When she stabbed a man, she knew that the result might lead to his death.

There are not only behavioral intentions, but also subjective intentions. After surrendering herself, she said that after she divorced her husband, she put all her efforts on the man, and he just wouldn't divorce. When she was in a bad mood, she got angry at work and was fired by her boss. These roots lie in men, so she is dissatisfied. This dissatisfaction continued to accumulate and eventually broke out. The woman admitted to stabbing the man.

Through the description of the woman, we can know that the woman subjectively stabbed the man, but she did some concealment in her behavior, in order to make her behavior more rational. I have to say that women have made some choices in their modus operandi. Nevertheless, this can't hide her subjective intention.

Women subjectively have the intention of killing people, and so do their behaviors. It's just a more subtle way, and she hopes such behavior can be characterized as self-defense. There is an essential difference between self-defense and intentional homicide. She wanted to be beautiful, but she forgot the police's investigation ability. Three times five divided by two will find out the truth of the matter, and she can't escape her intentional murder.

Although the lawyer gave her a defense of self-defense, she was sentenced. Some people say that she turned herself in and should be given a light sentence. Yes, it is. However, the impact of this incident is quite bad. She was sentenced to life imprisonment and deprived of political rights for life. Women also paid a huge price for their actions!

Third, women's behavior is quite sad, and even more sad is that there is no moral bottom line.

The behavior of women makes many people feel sorry. But many people forget that the reason for the mistake is that she has no moral concept. When I had a husband, I was with a man. After her husband knew it, he didn't hide it, but chose a divorce. After the divorce, knowing that the other party is not divorced, he is still with the other party. Is this a matter of thought?

Some people say, why are there only women and no men? That man is dead. Is it meaningful to talk about this? The man's behavior is also wrong, and his moral consciousness is also very low. However, he was punished and paid the price of his life. The woman was punished, and her story gave us some warning. There are still some boundaries between men and women.

The woman's behavior crossed the line, sent herself to prison and destroyed the other's family. Her family is in pieces, and the other family is in a mess. Is this the result she wants? Some people say that if a person can inspire evil in your heart, you must stay away from such a person. Men are such people!

Women are not far away, but addicted to it. What was the result? Both lose. Therefore, if you want to stay away from this kind of thing, you must have self-discipline and moral awareness. What do you think of this? Welcome everyone to leave a message and discuss together!