What are the advantages and disadvantages of Faidel, Nadal, Deyo and Murray?

Although Del Porto and Siric come from different nationalities, they are both Grand Slam champions, relying on strong serve and violent forehand, but their shortcomings also limit their development-mobility.

When he is too tall, he is still a little clumsy in dealing with difficult rescues and tennis matches. Must mention the new generation, Tim, Azvillev, Kachanov, Goffin, Kim, dimitrov, Busta, Kuric, Schwarczman, Isner, Sok. Even the new Sisyphus Sapovalov.

Because of their shortcomings, these people still can't break the rules of the Big Three. They are 90 12 years old. The last non-Big Three Grand Slam was the Wulin Card of the US Open in 16. Federer 38, Deyo and Nadal 32, 33. The future of people's tennis is really hard to say. Looking ahead, Tim and zverev are the most mature technicians.

The two biggest problems are psychological. In the finals or key games, there are often cases of losing points continuously at key moments. Pure technology, especially Tim, has the ability to challenge the Big Three. Although he is no longer young, people always say that he is too young to know whether this is good or bad. To sum up, Federer went through a turning operation, Nadal went through a major surgery to attack, and Deyo also went through a "meditation".

The technology of these giants is still improving and progressing, and their advantages and disadvantages often change, such as the current trend of hard shredders, but their essential advantages and disadvantages are not the same. Change: Federer's strength: the essence of tennis is mastered best-handsome and elegant. Disadvantages: Nadal's strength is too old: the soil is adaptable: the service is too abrasive. Djokovic's strength: he is good at playing the "away game" around the world, especially overcoming the bunt of the whole audience. That is: ugly spray.