What are the advantages of Changhe Big Dipper? Can it speed up?

Advantages: fuel saving and sufficient power.

Disadvantages: the brakes are not working. Talking too much is tears. Maybe without abdominal muscles. You can't step on the key tire for a few times. There is no brake at all. This car can meet abs requirements.

Appearance: a little, hehe

Interior: just so-so.

Space: It's good. After all, it looks like a chartered car.

Configuration: Not bad, otherwise I wouldn't choose. In 2006, many people said it was not worth it. What I like is Suzuki's small displacement machine, which is fuel-efficient and durable. To tell the truth, I'm not satisfied with anything except that good machine. I don't know where the abnormal noise comes from when driving, where it sounds, how uncomfortable it is to walk on the bad road, and the front and rear shock absorption.

The back door is a bit rotten, and the putty was scraped once. Not again, that's all. As long as there is nothing wrong with the machine, it is acceptable. I almost changed trains several times. I have had feelings for it for so many years, and I can't bear it at once. There is no such thing as a flat tire on the road. That Suzuki's little machine refueled, and it hasn't had an oil star for so many years, unlike some cars that have been driving for two years. The machine is full of oil and vehicles. I am a car mechanic. You have to change the oil after 5000 kilometers. I love cars. If I keep driving tens of thousands of kilometers, it's the same.

Power: Very good for a car with a displacement of 1.4. It's fast and has a sense of pushing back. The fastest speed 140km, a little floating. I dare not refuel. It is generally about 80km.

Control: Not bad, but cars at this price can't be too demanding.

Fuel consumption: I am most satisfied with the fuel consumption, which is not much less than that of the van. It really saves fuel.

Comfort: average

Advantages: it is economical and practical, and the old brand is safe to drive. The mature engine of 465 engine has few faults, cheap maintenance and fuel saving.

Disadvantages: there is no sd and central control, and you have to add central control yourself. The seat cover sent by 4s is too bad

Appearance: it's my favorite type, mainly a 3.4-meter home. It feels good to be open and square.

Interior: There is generally nothing to say.

Space: the driver's seat is very comfortable, and you can feel better when you look up than in the car. More than 60 boxes of braised chicken can be folded in the back seat, and the refrigerator can be placed horizontally without borrowing a car to help people move.

Configuration: economical, fuel-efficient, simple to operate, cheap to maintain, and occasionally pull goods.

Power: 60 horsepower machine is different from 13 model. It is easy to pull five people. It is easy to pull more than 3000 turns in the fifth gear when going uphill. It is not difficult to pull the goods at one time, 1000 kg. As long as you give up oil, the power is not enough and the speed is fast.

Control: electronic power steering wheel, light and wide field of vision.

Fuel consumption: I feel that 2000-3000 rpm is the most fuel efficient. Now the running-in period is less than five oils. I think it's absolutely no problem to have more oil when running in. The four-cylinder engine has enough fuel consumption, which is affordable for ordinary people.

Comfort: No matter what your figure is, you can drive.