Campus constellation department

How to write about the feelings of the post-constellations on campus?

I watched a TV series, wrote an article, and talked about my specific feelings and inspiration. The so-called "feeling" can be the truth or subtle thoughts learned from the works, the thoughts and associations inspired by the contents of the works, the determination and ideals inspired by watching, and the criticism of some ugly phenomena in society caused by watching. The expression of post-criticism is flexible and diverse, which basically belongs to the category of discussion, but writing is different from general argumentative essays because it must be based on reading. To write an experienced, insightful, emotional and innovative summary, we must pay attention to the following points.

We should pay attention to one word "feeling"

Many students began to write their own reflections, often writing the content of "concept" very long. They always like to introduce the story from beginning to end, for fear that readers don't know its content, but there are few words to express "feelings". For example, when a classmate wrote "The Story of an Only Daughter", he told the whole story from beginning to end. First, he wrote how Zhang Mingming excelled in his studies, and then he wrote that Zhang Mingming's father died suddenly and his mother was miserable. Then, I wrote that Zhang Mingming learned to comb her hair by herself, how to undertake heavy housework and accept severe tests, and then I wrote that she grew up day by day with the help of society. At the end, I wrote: I want to learn from Zhang Mingming, not give in to difficulties, and learn to do what I can from an early age. In view of such a structural review, I'm sure he has carefully watched it and remembered the plot of the film, but judging from the stylistic requirements of the review, it is unqualified. Because the full text only has the last sentence of "feeling", although the content of this "feeling" is appropriate, the article fails to grasp the key point of "feeling" and is biased, like a brief introduction to the content. I emphasize that students should focus on "feeling". From the text, the content of "feeling" accounts for about four or five times of the main content of the film. In this paper, the content of the film is quoted appropriately to serve the senses. Therefore, as long as you quote the content of * * in a few words, don't describe it in detail, let alone describe it in detail. After watching The Great Edison, I asked the students: Who can sum up the story in the simplest language? A classmate said: this film mainly tells the story of Edison's growth from a penniless basement cleaner to a world-famous great scientist; Another student added: What he mainly said was that he invented the electric light and brought light to the whole world. I compare the speeches of two students: the former is more accurate, while the latter is only the most outstanding one among countless inventions. I'm sure they can sum up the story in short words, and then let the students talk about their feelings. For example, Edison studied hard, was not afraid of failure, and dared to innovate. In this way, the article written can overcome the shortcomings of storytelling, not only highlighting the word "love", but also feeling people after reading it.