Is the quality of Changhe Big Dipper trustworthy? Is it out of control?

Advantages: the most satisfying thing is fuel saving, the space in the back row is dual-purpose, which is very convenient and practical!

Disadvantages: Changhe Automobile's work in the production of Big Dipper needs to be improved. There are not many details. There is no armor at the scene. Bought a new car and sprayed three bottles of 6L chassis armor. The internal assembly process needs to be improved.

Appearance: quite satisfactory.

Interior: Go on, hehe

Space: There are five people in the family, none of whom are fat or crowded.

Configuration: Overall, the Big Dipper is quite cost-effective. Regardless of shape, engine, space, etc. Everything is fine.

Power: 1.4 power off air conditioning is ok, a little weak.

Control: Suzuki's K 14B-D engine is still very classic, the speed increase is very satisfactory, and the power is also very strong.

Fuel consumption: Because I am a novice, I drive slowly, and now my fuel consumption is relatively high. Now it's about seven oils. It is estimated that I will save fuel if I drive skillfully.

Comfort: The seat is too flat, so it is better to add a seat cover.

Disadvantages: this car is already highly equipped. Why are there no fog lights? Are fog lights expensive? Don't let God feel unbalanced. Not worth much money. It has a reputation for following us.

Appearance: Not bad, better than a van.

Interior: this price is all hard plastic, it doesn't matter, the workmanship is acceptable.

Space: the space is big enough to carry people and pull things!

Configuration: I can't find the second one at the same price. The cost performance is quite high, but the abnormal noise is relatively large, but it runs well and just started.

Power: 60 horsepower feels good, and it is more than enough to drive such a light car. 1.4 feels a bit like a big horse-drawn car. After all, this car is not used for racing, so there is no need to run too fast. It's not safe to go too fast.

Control: It feels ok to drive, but not so good to hang!

Fuel consumption: It goes without saying that it is famous for saving fuel.

Comfort: Forget about the feeling of the van. The seats are too cheap. I have the urge to change seats. Just started, learn slowly. The noise is so loud, I don't know how the great gods will crack the machine. I want to point out the maze ... over.

Advantages: it is economical and practical, and the old brand is safe to drive. The mature engine of 465 engine has few faults, cheap maintenance and fuel saving.

Disadvantages: The most unsatisfactory thing is the poor shock absorption.

Appearance: Ordinary, uneven seams and poor workmanship.

Space: Needless to say, a lot of things have been dropped, and basically everything can be pulled. Flexible and changeable,

Configuration: Fortunately, it is cheap and suitable.

Power: Dongan's engine, originally thought that the power of 60 horsepower was obviously improved compared with the power of 48 horsepower of 1.0, but I was a little disappointed. Probably because I drive less, I always feel that this car is fleshy and doesn't run at a high speed. I didn't look at the speed carefully at 2000 rpm in the fifth gear, and I didn't dare to run around 80 yards. Is it a little slow?

Control: You can park anywhere and find a parking space.

Fuel consumption: low fuel consumption

Comfortable: better than bread, feeling less stupid than QQ?