Astrology course: the debate about the position of the palace head and the method of dividing the palace

Debate on the position of palace master and the method of palace division

There is more than one way to divide the astrolabe.

In the basic astrological practice, the palace position may be the most controversial issue. Although people basically agree on the importance and significance of the house, there are great differences on what system to use and how to use it. There are more than twelve ways to divide the palace. Similarly, the palace master has different explanations. Few astrologers can really understand the basic symbolic meaning of the zodiac, because the construction of most zodiac systems is more complicated than determining the position of the new stars of the zodiac.

The most popular method of dividing the palace in western countries is placido, which is widely used and circulated because of its effectiveness. This method is based on "three-day and half-arc" and divides the space or time region by transit point and rising point. In fact, most methods of dividing palaces are based on the fact that Zhongtian is the head of the tenth house and Ascending Point is the head of the first house. The measurement of head position in other palaces is slightly different. These palaces are called middle palaces.

"Three days and a half arc" is not something that can be said casually. This sentence can't form a picture intuitively, thus opening people's minds and making people understand its meaning. It is more like an arbitrary and accurate system, which has become the standard of many western astrologers. But due to the lack of symbolic understanding of this method, we can only accept it with faith and experience. The idea of "work" is right, which will weaken astrology. I can accept that "useful" is a legitimate reason to use this method, but it is better than those methods that are useless to you without advocacy. Every astrologer will have different reactions to different methods. Magic exists in practitioners, and the method itself does not have magic.

Gonggongtou

Many astrologers have made accurate explanations for the heads of various houses. If there is a planet in your chart at the first point of the third house, then the planet is still interpreted as being in the second house. In the process of transportation or pushing, planets will be marked when they pass through the house. I have some questions about this method for the following reasons:

1. Different ways of dividing the palace make the position of the palace master different.

2. If the birth time error is 4 minutes, the position of the uterine head will change by 65438 0 degrees.

3. Ptolemy stipulated that the position tolerance of the palace head was 5 degrees.

The Bawa Palace in India is divided into the center of a palace as the most powerful point.

5.Gauquelin's research shows that foremen also have tolerance problems.

6. The huber School believes that the center of gravity of the palace is in the palace, not at the head of the palace.

I once asked the astrologer Robert Hand which method can best describe the positions of the stars in the sky that we can see, that is, the positions of the stars in astronomy. He told me that each system is correct in its own system from its own unique point of view. According to their own rules, each reflects the real situation, which is correct in their own field, but they have no right to speak in other fields.

The 20th century astrologers DaneRudhyar and CharlesJayne used the division method of Campanus Palace, which was more logical. In this method, the horizon is a big circle, just like a CD, and we stand on it. Meridian is a vertical circle running through the north and south. The main vertical circle is another vertical circle that runs through the horizon. Campana's palace division method is to divide the main vertical circle and push out the palace head. But in fact, on the whole, I don't like this way of housing distribution, and I don't like analyzing my astrolabe like this, so I put it aside.

Grant Louis adopted the equal palace system. In the 20th century, some British astrologers preferred this method because they got rid of the extreme situation of house size at latitudes far from the equator. Flat palace system can also be found in many traditional palace division methods. However, because the house is a regular 30-degree arc starting from the rising point, the transition is excluded from the house construction equation. I agree with Rudhyar, who thinks that we must consider the meridian, because "we don't live lying down".

Many of my colleagues, including me, use the Koch Palace method. My teacher first started to use this method, and I like to publish this method book for the first time. The author of this book is a man whose sun, moon and rising point are in Virgo. I regard it as the sublimation of placido Palace, but I no longer use placido Palace to study it, it is only a part of my own research method. More specifically, there is no single way to reveal the vastness and greatness of the universe.

The moment of birth

If the birth time is not accurate, how to determine the exact location of each palace Lord and then explain the astrolabe? Taking the birth of my two daughters as an example, I think birth is a process rather than a simple event. From the beginning of labor, until the baby's head comes out, the body comes out, and the first breath is taken until the umbilical cord is cut. The first breath is the most common and logical judgment basis. My daughter's initial cry was very low, not the loud cry that we expected to herald the birth of a baby. In addition, cut the umbilical cord after the baby breathes for the first time. So it's really hard to determine when my mother will start living independently.

Charles Jayne did a lot of work to correct the birth time, and he came to the conclusion that the effective birth time used to study the astrolabe does not necessarily coincide with the baby's first breath. Jenny believes that an effective astrolabe may actually be before or after a person's birth time. Another astrologer, Vilade Bogdan, pointed out that birth may not be a specific point in time, but a series of events.

Constellation robbery

Another problem worth considering is constellation robbery. When analyzing the astrolabe, I am often confused about the role of robbery. First of all, there are so many questions about the location of the house that the analysis of the location of the house seems to be based on unconvincing understanding. Secondly, the view that the earth's energy is limited by' three days and a half arc' has a long history. Third, the influence of these planets is often negatively explained, which has opened the distance between customers and planetary energy.

Planets are real, seasons are real, and phases are real, but houses are based on different and often vague rules. It is neither logical nor meaningful to weaken the energy of a planet just by robbing a constellation.

I know that many people claim to know the influence of the astrolabe, but any trait that plays an important role in a person's personality may appear in the astrolabe in several ways. I opposed the importance of grabbing constellations years ago. Someone responded that her sun sign was in Aries and was robbed. She is obviously a less competitive Aries. I asked her if Neptune was facing her Aries sun. That's true. In other words, a fixed rule explains this situation well.

Maybe the foreman is not the limit point.

Now, if the palace head is not an absolute point, it will change with the operation of energy, so how should we interpret it? I like to analyze the foreman with a tolerance of 5 degrees. This is based on the above recognition of its unreliability and the recognition of the process. What does it mean for the second house to become the third house? Instead of drawing a strict line between personal value and property, observation and transportation, I prefer to think about how the second house becomes the third house. When did we shift our attention from feeling about personal property to feeling about our surroundings? What does what we have have to do with the way we look at the world?

From this perspective, the analysis of the palace is more complicated. The purpose of this analysis is not to blur the problem, but to see more gray shadows between black and white ends. This can remind us that a circular circle has no beginning and no end. This is the movement of our life. This method also broadens the thinking of astrologers and encourages people's thinking to change and develop constantly, rather than being limited to rigid rules.

Our analytical methods influence our interpretation. Our attitude towards astrology will largely determine what we can get from it. If we seek the absolute answer from the absolute system, then we may only get the point of view on special occasions, but we will still be punished for our extremely limited choice and understanding. Appreciate the nuances of things-eager to see the process, not the result. Just like life, it is full of vitality, even if there are some uncertainties sometimes.