Love call forwarding comments

Maybe every man has had two such women, at least two. Who can love a person all his life in Chia Ling's movie Love Calls Transfer? Married a red rose, over time, the red one turned into a touch of mosquito blood on the wall, and the white one was the moonlight in front of the window; Married a white rose, the white is the glutinous rice on the clothes, and the red is the Zhu Shazhi in my heart. -Zhang Ailing

This is a topic raised by a friend a long time ago, and I have never known how to reply. Last night, I took it out to watch the movie "Love Call Transfer", and I always felt very bored (of course, watching this movie specially also has a certain origin, hehe ...). There are twelve women in this film, which also represents the characteristics of the twelve constellations. Although I think it is a bit exaggerated, it does show the shortcomings and ills of women. But every woman has every woman's advantages, and every woman also has every woman's shortcomings. This may be why men always want to have two or more women. Of course, so do women. This is the pursuit of perfect humanity, without exception. It's just that Zaler Xu in the film, like all men, doesn't appreciate the advantages of women, hides their shortcomings and clumsily makes a mess of his life. Hehe ... really think about it, huh! That's true. I think of an article about a mental patient whose symptoms are extreme fear of contact with women, including a sense of insecurity at first sight. He said that seven lonely days are not the same species at all, but only about the difference between X and Y chromosomes in DNA (in male X/Y, X contains two or three thousand genes and is active frequently. Y contains dozens of genes, and its activity is very small! ) are particularly thorough. He said that women were born to conquer the earth. Is every man more or less afraid of women? But I don't think it's necessary. Maybe God arranged for women to be born just to conquer men? Far from the point, there is such a sentence at the end of the film: if you love someone, you must love all of him or her. This is a vulgar saying that has been circulating for many years. Everyone says that if you love someone, you have to love all of him or her. But, I want to ask, who can love all of a person?

I remember when I was a child, there were three books that I liked best. One was Grimm's Fairy Tales, the other was Andersen's Fairy Tales, and the third was French Fairy Tales, so that now, I often can't tell where Cinderella, Ugly Duckling and Beauty and the Beast came from ... The topic is too far from the point. In fact, I want to say that there are some fairy tales with beautiful love.

I am thinking, what if we continue to fantasize about the happy life of the princess and the prince from now on? Will there be the so-called seven-year itch? Will the prince complain why the princess always wears a white skirt? And will the princess get tired of the unchanging white horse under the prince's crotch? As Zaler Xu said in Love Call Transfer: "You always wear this purple sweater at home, always wear this purple sweater. I hate purple most, you know? I hate to see purple, and the cup for brushing my teeth has to be placed on the second floor of the grid. I have a review of Chia Ling's movie Love Calls Transfer. You can't even make a difference. Toothpaste should be squeezed from top to bottom, so what's wrong with me squeezing from the middle? I'm willing to squeeze in. Why? Four times a week is always Zhajiang Noodles and TV series; Tv series, slag river surface. When you eat noodles, can you stop playing with noodles? ……"

So, it's still the same question: Who can love all of a person?

I remember one day, I received a short message, which basically said: Love a person because he or she has a selfish temperament. I think this is another interpretation of love. Although it can't be the main theme, it is true. Sometimes love itself is selfish and a kind of possession. Only when you can't get it, can you say "it's better to know each other than to love each other" However, after you have it, you also have such troubles. The more you have, the more troubles you have. If you have everything, you have all the troubles. For example, women's cleanliness and nagging, men's carelessness and sloppy. These things are irrelevant before they are owned, and they can even become advantages. Nagging can be regarded as care, sloppy can be regarded as character, but having it is different.

So who can love all of a person?

In fact, we can't love all of a person. The so-called love for a person's whole just tells us that we can accept a person's whole, inclusive and understandable. Or we can always keep him (her) in mind. This reminds me of another sentence (as if from Talmud): God didn't use a man's head as a woman, because women can't dominate men; At the same time, God didn't make women with men's feet, because women can't be slaves of men and trampled by innocents. Why did God create women from men's ribs? Because, God wants women to be in men's hearts all the time.

We all know that no one is perfect, just like, no perfect love, just like, no perfect marriage. But everyone around us is our own mirror. What we see in the mirror is actually our own shadow. If we can treat others as ourselves, we will have a tolerant heart and will not care about other people's mistakes.