Examples of inclusion relationships

In order to help candidates successfully pass the recruitment examination of public institutions! Today, I will bring you an in-depth analysis of the inclusion relationship of analogical reasoning in the judgment reasoning problem base. I hope I can help you prepare for the exam smoothly!

Analogical reasoning is basically involved in all kinds of professional tests of administrative ability. Analogical reasoning is a kind of problem that we can easily score and do quickly, but occasionally some difficult problems appear in the exam. Today, we will look at the inclusion relationship of difficulties.

The so-called inclusion relationship refers to the subordinate relationship between two concepts, also called subset relationship, such as "apple" and "fruit", and "apple" is included in "fruit". When the stem of the question examines the inclusion relationship and only one of the options is the inclusion relationship, we can choose directly. However, when there are multiple options in the topic options containing relationships, a deeper analysis is needed. So for the examination and analysis included in the exam, there are the following situations, which we can feel through examples:

Example 1 electric fan: electric appliance Yellow River: River

In this set of example sentences, "electric fan" is included in "electric appliance" and "Yellow River" is included in "river", but there are still some differences between the two groups of words. "Electric appliance" is the concept of a thing, and "Yellow River" is the singular of a single thing.

Example 2 Red wine: coffee: beverage Vertebrate: mammal: puffer fish

In this group of examples, "red wine" and "coffee" are in a parallel relationship, both of which are included in "drinks". The puffer fish is included in vertebrates, not mammals, and mammals are included in vertebrates. Therefore, we should fully consider the relationship between words in this trinomial form.

After distinguishing these different types of identical relationships, we will consolidate them through several examples:

Example 1 Railway: Highway

A. Nanjing: Jiangsu B. Air conditioning: household appliances

C. Britain: Western Europe D. America: country

Answer B. Analysis: The "railway" in the stem is included in the "highway".

Item A, "Nanjing" is an integral part of "Jiangsu", which is inconsistent with the topic and is excluded;

Item b, "air conditioning" is included in "household appliances", which is consistent with the topic and reserved;

Item C, "Britain" is located in "Western Europe", which belongs to the positional relationship and is inconsistent with the topic, so it is excluded;

Item D, "United States" is included in "country" and reserved;

Comparing items B and D, the "railway" in the stem of the question is the concept of a kind of thing, the "air conditioning" is also the concept of a kind of thing, and "America" is a single thing, so choose B.

Example 2 Plants: Gymnosperms: Taxus chinensis

A. School: Middle School: Primary School B. Country: Nationality: Company

C. science: physics: mechanics D. galaxy: constellation: sun

Answer C. Analysis: Taxus chinensis in the stem is contained in gymnosperms, and gymnosperms are contained in plants.

Item A, "primary school" and "middle school" are in a parallel relationship, both of which are included in "school", which is inconsistent with the topic and is excluded;

Item b, "country", "nationality" and "company" have no obvious relationship, so it is excluded;

Item C, "mechanics" is included in "physics" and "physics" is included in "mechanics", which is consistent with the topic and reserved;

Item d, "constellation" has no obvious relationship with "sun", so it is excluded;

Therefore, choose item C.

Chinese public education counseling experts remind candidates that although analogical reasoning is relatively simple, the difficulty of the exam is gradually increasing, so they should be more familiar with deep-seated discrimination.