Is the high-scoring reward constellation reliable?

After all, science is not developed enough to explain everything, so why should all the unknowns be attributed to pseudoscience?

I think the science of constellations is related to the movement of stars. This kind of thing, magnetic field, has such a great influence that our science cannot be poor.

But we know that small changes in the magnetic field can destroy the earth. Compared with it, human beings are so small.

The constellations of China people and westerners can be said to be a historical summary of thousands of years. The subtle connection between them lies in celestial bodies and time.

The eight-character time calculation includes the factors of the comprehensive motion position of celestial bodies. Not to mention the constellation.

A single constellation is unreliable and inaccurate. If you want to see accurately, you need to combine your personal astrolabe. That is where you were born, where the celestial bodies are in time. It is accurate to combine the positions of the nine planets, including the latitude and longitude of the birthplace, into a personal astrolabe.

We can't say for sure whether our destiny is related to celestial movements or constellations, but we can know that personality determines fate, so personal personality derived from celestial movements also derives personal destiny. So when personality changes dramatically, natural fate will be different.

But I do believe in the influence of magnetic fields on people. You should know that the way people think and act is determined by the brain, and the thinking mode of the brain is influenced by three aspects. Brain waves are the way of brain activity. Isn't brain wave a magnetic field? Does the magnetic field have no effect on the magnetic field?

Why do people directly assert that constellations are not credible without exploring the possible research value behind them? Is it necessary to wait until this way is extinct, and in the future, human beings will study constellations and astrology like Maya civilization?

As for whether it is science or not. This will not be known until science has exhausted its knowledge of the universe. You know Galileo overthrew Aristotle, who had been regarded as truth for thousands of years, and Einstein overthrew Newton, a great man. Is it certain that no one will overthrow today's pseudoscience in the future?

Supplement: It's not that there are no books on astrology, but books on this subject are strictly managed in China, so we have no chance to read them. As for the history of various countries, there are countless books on astrology.

Third, the sun sign is popular now, because it has a great influence on people's personality. But the accuracy is not high. But it will be too difficult to generalize the astrolabe algorithm. Because the algorithm and analysis of astrolabe is very complicated and difficult. It's impossible without experts. And the so-called system calculation method is not completely correct. The astrolabes are interrelated, and the results can only be obtained by comprehensive understanding and analysis. This change is ever-changing, and the programmer's understanding of the astrolabe has a far-reaching impact on the accuracy of the results.

Not without statistics. Isn't it vernal equinox, summer solstice, autumn equinox, winter solstice, awn seed ... The 24 solar terms are not based on previous experience, and the accumulation of these experiences is not a statistical process? And the details of this statistic were written word for word on the calendar by the ancients? In fact, the calendar only writes the results of their long-term research. If your calendar is long, how thick is it?

As for whether the constellation is pseudoscience, it is still too early to say. Don't be too sure about one thing and don't be too negative. It's not too late to wait until the truth finally comes out. Lest you think you are wrong and be laughed at by others. I realized that in my words, I didn't completely deny this incredible possibility.

It is not a scientific support, but a hypothesis. Don't acupoints exist without dissection? Haven't hundreds of millions of people in China tried the magic of acupoint therapy? The scientific nature of TCM has not been revealed. Can the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine be completely denied? Don't jump to conclusions

The ability of psychological suggestion is very strong. The development of human brain is only 1%, and the other 99% is called subconscious. Can you say it's not very powerful? The ability of the subconscious is beyond your imagination. No one will deny this. According to the questioner's statistical theory, can you point out the probability of this phenomenon? In addition, this experiment not only applies to constellations, but also has another name, called Hypnosis Department. Hypnosis is recommended. Now everyone tells you that you are wearing red clothes, but what you see is green. Do you think you are color blind or the whole world is lying to you?

Finally, if you ask me if it will rain tomorrow, I will say, there is no cloud today, maybe not. Does this mean that what I said is false? When someone reminds you that you will have a lot of doubts about your lover A, but if you change to B, you will trust him very much. Don't you want to be accurate? Then you have to say that you doubt that A is unfaithful to you, not that A loves you. What you trust is B's love for you, not how thick his wallet is?

What you said in detail is impossible. When I asked you to comment on Mother Teresa, you said she was kind and devout. Or talked for half an hour?

In addition, it is not that there is no special astrology discipline, but that there is no astrology discipline in China. Questioners can see the world.

Finally, I am not a constellation theorist. It's just that there is no absolute thing in the world, and I won't absolutely deny that it has its correct side and scientific possibility.