Is there really a supernatural phenomenon in the world?

What is a supernatural phenomenon? It can be understood as a phenomenon beyond the conventional knowability of natural science; In other words, it goes beyond the limits of contemporary natural science knowledge and is considered impossible to produce or explain.

As a biologist, I am strongly attracted by the vague edge of science and fascinated by the strange ghost under the popular superficial understanding.

I am trying to redefine this boundary, so that I can naturally live in harmony with what seems supernatural. At the same time, it helps to create an area similar to non-military control, so that scientists and enthusiasts can cross this area without asking to give up their original ideas or their sense of surprise.

If the general public shows interest in supernatural phenomena, it will inevitably develop into a grand cause and will be misinterpreted by the market. I realize that I have a responsibility to help create this situation.

When you look at everything carefully, nothing attracts you like supernatural phenomena. Everything we do seems to be empirical reports beyond natural explanations-but they are surprisingly rich. These reports are so frequently and widely disseminated that it is difficult for anyone with real scientific curiosity to ignore them.

I am deeply attracted by the fact that it is all people in the world, not just when we mourn it. Some realities beyond the scope of scientific knowledge have been recognized and accepted. They hold the belief that things exist, which includes the soul, extraordinary and incredible things, things that give the soul a new body and regeneration, and communicating with the dead through telepathy between the living-this belief is so numerous and lasting that it seems to tempt everyone to find the same reason.

I don't insist that supernatural phenomena must exist If someone simply defines supernatural experience as a physical examination of something unusual, something beyond the limit that is usually considered possible, then there is obviously a vast field of experience, a field of repeated experience, which is all over the world, waiting for people to explore. This kind of report is natural, and there are a lot of anecdotes, which are discarded as unacceptable science. This is a pity, because I doubt whether the answers to some mysteries beyond the scope of normal scientific knowledge can just exist in the content and mode of this report.

My own unusual experience in various cultures strongly tells me that some things are worth pursuing. These supernatural phenomena are strange, capricious and elusive, and have not changed my firmness at all. We are learning very important things, and we are studying areas that appear almost often in our lives but are still difficult to describe.

I believe that supernatural phenomena need a new and thorough view very much; A summary of cross-cultural anomalous phenomenon; Unusual ethnic history; A broad-based and well-funded professional work, rescuing, collecting, cataloguing and classifying all existing abnormal events. Nothing is more valuable than my personal attempt to understand what I have seen and heard in recent years. I sincerely believe that this attempt is necessary, because I have retained the belief that these things that keep happening around us cannot be easily condensed into the patterns we have adapted to. I think a new and more open psychoanalysis can make us better understand what is normal. Strange things keep happening.

We live in a world where reality is defined by science, which tells us how things work and develop. But some things don't seem to work the way science tells us at all. Our science tells us that these things are impossible. They don't exist, but they stubbornly refuse to leave us. Although they are relatively few and often elusive and uncontrollable, they do exist. Anyone can see it and prove its existence. It is their existence that gives us a problem, no matter how weak they look.

Some unusual students think that science should turn to these existing facts. Some scientists seem to agree with this view. When they were surprised to find the possibility of the whole fact, they made science fall in love with it and took a completely reversed choice. This gesture is ridiculous.

Consider an example. A rod divination prospector claimed that he could find groundwater and burning minerals with the help of a pendulum, and conducted a field test in Wales, England. He crossed the valley on foot and drew a stake line on the ground, indicating that there was a stream under the line, and estimated its depth and flow from the ground. The TV team filmed an abnormal phenomenon program for him. A reporter asked him how his statement was verified. The staff divination explorer put his clock on the reporter's head, silently evaluated the reporter's health, and then made an amazing assertion. He said that the reporter was healthy, but there was a piece of metal in his thigh. People around you were surprised and impressed. This unusual diagnosis proves that what happened in the past is correct. Once a reporter did use a metal bracket during the operation. With the help of the metal bracket, the strength of the femur was enhanced, resulting in a metal fragment left on the inner thigh of the reporter. He also pointed out that the reporter's limbs were normal. The embedding of the metal plate did not cause any defects. Scientists think it is hard to say that the fact that the prospector pointed out that there were metal fragments in the reporter's stock was due to his very effective detective network.

What the hell is going on? Is there any scientific validity in a series of discussions on the possibility of prospecting with a stick? Is it surprising about organometallic testing? No, no. Faced with these strange theories, a famous physicist said, "I think this is a coincidence." From and ended this topic. Of course, the responsibility of scientists requires that problems be considered from all angles. Scientists have the right to support explanations consistent with orthodox scientific views-they have equal rights to all other things. Although, everything is not exactly the same. Coincidence is still a possible explanation for things, but the probability is very low. It should be pointed out that orthodox explanations are often more unreliable and far-fetched than frankly admitting the facts.

That's the truth. Sometimes unusual things do happen. This has happened to me, sometimes often, as if it were inevitable. As a scientist, I think we should admit that the facts have raised questions for us. Science judges what is possible by defining reality. Those who fit this definition are recognized, those who don't fit this definition are considered impossible and must be rejected. The problem is that the fact of prospecting with a stick or the noisy phenomenon of elves is in direct contradiction with the current definition. So the scope of the debate is narrowed down to the question of choosing between competing facts. In the competition, if the conventional state is right about the abnormal phenomenon, naturally, the conventional state will often win.

Such distortions should prompt us to doubt the premise that they become inevitable. We don't know how things work. Everything we have is just a reasonable and effective assumption, and we are by no means making a choice among many competing facts. The key to everything is the validity of an effective hypothesis. To make the new facts consistent with the old theory, we need to admit that the theory may be imperfect and there is no need to tell anyone what to do. There is no threat to the laws of nature or scientific principles, and there is no need to protect beliefs and accuse pagans.

In the process of thinking, I was surprised at the conclusions drawn by others. I found that James, an intuitive psychologist, had already done research and reached a conclusion. He said: "Our normal waking consciousness is just a special form of consciousness. Everything about it is separated by the thinnest screen, and there are completely different potential forms of consciousness. ..... Regardless of the universe, other remaining ideologies will eventually be ignored. ..... they forbid us to test reality prematurely. "

My research is public. I have no answers and lack the necessary mental maturity to find them. I doubt the simple answer to enlightenment and rebirth. But as a biologist, I have repeatedly realized a kind of consciousness, which is eternal, has no beginning and no end, and is infinite in space or within our own ontology; In this range, our understanding of things is very clear, and we can get most of the information through a process of infiltration. In this state, I find that my knowledge comes directly from the existing part of something bigger, a spiritual global ecology. Secularity is beautiful, and it will only come when I am immersed in some natural cycle-when I am bathed in the spring tide, or when I treat it equally.

The experience is really wonderful, leaving me with a feeling of strict consistency with nature, rather than surpassing nature. It's like getting a warm welcome at home. Let's go back to the mystery that exists in the hidden side of things; Return to the complete pedigree of possibility; Everything is normal and abnormal, everything is normal and abnormal. Go back to the whole unusual experience I call superego.