On the cultural concept behind appellation

The same thing. The same thing. . Just found one. .

In 2 1 century, the word "teacher" became popular. Of course, this first shows that the profession of teachers is respected, but everyone can be called a "teacher", but it is always unacceptable.

According to the ancient concept of "Heaven and Earth, Kinship and Teacher" in China, besides the four statues of Heaven and Earth, Kinship and Kinship, the next statue is "Teacher", so obviously, "Teacher" is a very noble title. Now, as long as you sing a few songs, play a few movies and TV series, and show your face, you can call each other "teachers". This noble title is really getting worse and worse.

Here, the author wants to talk about the term "teacher" in universities. In the university, all the staff in the school are called "teachers", which is a "never-before" convention, and everyone is used to it. But it's never been like this. It's not necessarily right.

The author thinks that there are only two possibilities to use the term "teacher" in universities: first, the called person's occupation is "teacher"; Second, the caller knows from the bottom of his heart that the person being called is his "teacher" and is willing to accept him as a teacher. Except these two, others should not be called "teachers". Therefore, among university administrators, no one should be called "teacher" except those who hold the administrative position of teacher, or the writer really thinks that an administrator can be his own teacher. This is almost pedantic because it seems to be just a title, but in essence it is related to the idea of running a university and the establishment of a modern university system.

Teaching and educating people, academic supremacy is the foundation of a university. The professional nature of administrative posts in colleges and universities determines that they obey and serve teaching and scientific research. It is necessary to make it clear here that "subordination" and "service" do not mean that there is a difference between the two professions: teachers and administration. In my opinion, teachers and administrative teams in universities should be two parallel systems with different responsibilities, evaluation systems and assessment standards. This is a concept that must be clearly defined before establishing the so-called modern university system. However, in China's current universities, this is not clear, and the abuse of the title of "teacher" in universities is the manifestation of this confusion.

In some schools, there are some common phenomena: when some department-level cadres are called "Director A", they often say, "You're welcome, please call me teacher." In some offices, employees call each other "teachers", which is considered as a good administrative culture. All this shows that everyone just regards "teacher" as a common title, and thinks that calling each other "teacher" or calling themselves "teacher" is a kind of modesty. If someone calls him director, it is "official standard". Actually, it's all wet. Professional administrators call each other "teachers" and "teachers", which confuses the difference between teachers and administrative teams. So that in order to show that "teachers" are not "teachers", real teachers have to be called professors and doctoral supervisors on some occasions, which is really a very helpless result.

Confucius said, "Will it be righteous?" "The name is not right." The abuse of the title of "teacher" by China University shows that we are far from the ancient ceremony and the modern university system culture based on the western tradition. In the cultural construction of modern universities, we are still in an awkward position.