why

The process of physics research is as follows: observation and imagination = "make a hypothesis (including the definition of some characteristics in the phenomenon, the definition of symbols in the hypothesis formula, and the explanation of the actual meaning of the formula structure ...) =" compare the hypothesis with the experimental results. If the error with the experimental results is within an acceptable range, and assuming that similar experimental results can be predicted correctly, then we think this assumption is correct.

This is how you define the charge. At first, the phenomenon of electricity was observed, and then scientists at that time made the hypothesis of charge, and the structure accidentally coincided with the experimental results. What's more, more phenomena can be explained by charge and related theories, which can also be applied in reality. As a result, the concept of charge has been recognized by scientists all over the world and has been used ever since.

It is not impossible to establish another set of electrical theories. As long as it is consistent with the experiment, it can be recognized. As long as your theory is more concise, it can be popularized. In fact, there is no hard and fast rule in physical theory. As long as it conforms to the experiment, it is right at present.

The problem you revised has risen from physics to social science, hehe.

You say that physicists and alchemists are the same, but there is nothing wrong with that. It's just that society pays different attention to them in different periods. In the feudal period of all countries in the world, alchemists held a high position as fortune tellers.

When you talk about their respective fields, in fact, they do research on nature under their own "knowledge system", physicists do it under various formulas and theorems, and alchemists do it under another system. No matter what kind of knowledge system they use, they are studying and exploring the objective laws of the objective world. The laws of the objective world exist objectively and are independent of human will. Therefore, whether physicists or alchemists,

In fact, there is nothing that people don't believe. Now people advocate science, not because science itself is good, but because science has made great contributions to human society in the contemporary era. People use scientific theory to solve problems and difficulties that other knowledge systems can't solve, so some people will advocate science. Zhouyi is not bad, moreover, it is the product of China's special color, but today, Zhouyi alone can no longer meet the needs of China's social development, and science meets the needs of people's development.

There are too many rules and regulations because the objective laws are too complicated and can only be studied with a large number of theories. Rules and regulations are designed to reveal the facts. If the facts are really covered up, someone will definitely overturn them.