The method of breaking hexagrams in the Book of Changes and the interpretation of hexagrams.

This statement has been circulated in ancient books, but I personally think it is wrong, because it is a rigid view, which hides the usage source of the hexagrams in Zhouyi. Although breaking hexagrams with hexagrams was an ancient method, it was only popular at that time, but it was not popular after the Han Dynasty. This is because the hexagrams were only an application of Yi Li by Wang Wen and Duke Zhou, and the academic development of Yi Li at that time was far less developed than that after the Han Dynasty. Therefore, at that time, the play of Yi Li and Guali was limited; At that time, it was still an early and relatively backward development stage of Yi-ology. It seems that the practice of divination is well known in modern times, and there are many real examples, only Takashima Duan Yi.

Besides, why is Zhu's breaking the law a rigid cognition? Personally, that doesn't conform to the function of Zhouyi hexagrams. The sixty-four hexagrams of Zhouyi are only sixty-four original "static hexagrams", not all of them. Dynamic refers to a kind of "dynamic divination" derived from some static divination, but this kind of dynamic divination does not mean that static divination has changed one's mind-dynamic divination is also an intermediate form between static divination. For example, at the beginning, divination moves and divination changes to weather, so at the beginning, divination moves = weather? Absolutely not. This is a different kind of divination. Therefore, in Zhu's statement, when there are more than three changes, it is nonsense to look at the statement of change of heart and the statement that the five changes were broken by static remarks.

For example, the first, second and fifth movements of divination are a volcanic journey. This is a kind of "moving divination", which is neither a dry divination nor a line divination. Don't look at the divination words of stem divination and tourism divination. But to combine the words of the first, second and fifth hexagrams to make a comprehensive judgment. Zhu didn't understand this truth, but the people who invented this usage did, so he gave the conclusion of "using nine"-"It's lucky to see a leaderless group!" . What is "using nine"? All six hexagrams are moving, which means comprehensive hyphenation. This is definitely not equal to Kun Gua Jing Gua (six hexagrams turned into Kun Gua), and it has nothing to do with Kun Gua's rhetoric!