Britain released a coin portrait of Charles III and the British film Charles III.

On September 30th, local time, the Royal Mint announced the portrait of Charles III, which will appear on coins. According to Reuters's report on September 30th, this portrait is the work of British sculptor Martin Jennings, and it was personally approved by Charles III. According to the tradition of the British royal family, the portrait of Charles III on the coin faces to the left, contrary to the portrait of the late Queen Elizabeth II on the coin. The Latin inscription around the portrait means "Charles III, by the grace of God, defender of faith". According to previous reports, on September 27th, Buckingham Palace, Royal Mint, Bank of England and Royal Mail Group announced that coins, banknotes and stamps bearing the portrait of Charles III would be gradually introduced in Britain. On the 26th, Buckingham Palace also announced the new monarch logo that will appear on the government building and the red mailbox.

Let's see what happened when Britain announced the coin portrait of Charles III.

On September 30th, local time, the Royal Mint announced the portrait of Charles III, which will appear on coins.

According to Reuters's report on September 30th, this portrait is the work of Martin Jennings, a British sculptor, and has been personally approved by Charles III.

Jennings said that his work was carved from a photo of Charles, which was the "smallest work" he had ever created. He felt "humble" at the thought that "in the next few centuries, people all over the world will see and hold coins bearing the portrait of Charles III".

According to the tradition of the British royal family, the portrait of Charles III on the coin faces to the left, contrary to the portrait of the late Queen Elizabeth II on the coin. The Latin inscription around the portrait means "Charles III, by the grace of God, defender of faith".

The Royal Mint said in a statement that in the next few months, the portrait of Charles will begin to appear on coins in circulation and some commemorative works. The first coins with the portrait of Charles III will be a special 5-pound coin and 50p coin to commemorate Elizabeth II.

According to previous reports, on September 27th, Buckingham Palace, Royal Mint, Bank of England and Royal Mail Group announced that coins, banknotes and stamps bearing the portrait of Charles III would be gradually introduced in Britain. On the 26th, Buckingham Palace also announced the new monarch logo that will appear on the government building and the red mailbox.

Reading related to the publication of The Portrait of Charles III in Britain;

Charles III, the new king of England in film and television dramas, and some cold knowledge about him.

# Title Creation Challenge #

Author: Li Xiaotian

1. Yesterday I wrote some gossip about Elizabeth II who just died. Today, let's talk about Charles III, the new king of England, and some cold knowledge about him and his image in film and television.

2. Charles III's full name is Charles Philip Arthur George Mountbatten-Windsor, and he was born in 10. He was crowned Crown Prince from the age of 10, and then waited for 64 years for a long time, and finally came out and officially became king.

However, Charles III was destined to be a lame king. After all, just before he ascended the throne, the news just announced that Britain's GDP was officially surpassed by India and fell to sixth place. It is said that the sixth place in the world is also a fairly high position, but this used to be the British Empire, a country where the sun never sets, and India is just one of its many colonies. It is really embarrassing to be easily surpassed by the colonies now. The British empire has declined. Even, I can only watch India throw away the distance from Britain, and there is no possibility of overtaking. The face of the British empire is too loud!

4. Charles said a long time ago that he didn't want to be called Charles III, because Charles I and charles ii were both bad things and had serious historical stains. Charles I was beheaded, and charles ii was called "Happy King". In his life, there was a lot of political chaos. The legacy of Charles III is really not a good thing, and it doesn't look good. The new king prefers to be called Philip II, Arthur I or George VII. However, this was not chosen by Charles, and the royal proclamation was directly announced, that is, Charles III/Charles III. Charles, you don't even have the right to choose your own name

Charles waited for 64 years as the crown prince. So who is the prince in the history of China? The first is Yin Ren, the second son of Kangxi, who has been a prince for 39 years. Results As the longest reigning emperor in China, Kangxi reigned for 6 1 year. Yin Yong was really impatient and grumpy. He was forced to enter the palace. Finally, it was completely abolished by Kangxi and passed on to the fourth prince Yin Zhen, namely Yongzheng. History tells us that we should be honest. If we don't have the strength, we shouldn't fiddle around. Just wait honestly. Yin Ren is really stupid. Charles really can't hold back, but it also shows that Charles is really a soft egg and has nothing to recommend, and his reputation among the people is not very good. In particular, the divorce of Princess Diana and the marriage of mistress Camilla have made the British people dissatisfied and resentful. Politics is inaction, pants chain can't be pulled up, and mud can't help the wall. Even if there was a little good reputation in the early years, it was thanks to Princess Diana.

As mentioned in the last article, Charles is 74 years old enough to become the new king. But he's not the oldest. Not to mention, King Abdullah II of Saudi Arabia ascended the throne in 2005, and he was over 8 1 year old. Then he became king of1year and died. In 20 13, the Vatican's new Pope Francis was over 77 years old when he ascended the throne, and he was even older than Charlie when he ascended the throne. In the history of China, the oldest person to be enthroned was Wu Zetian, who was 67 years old when she became emperor. Counting the separatist forces, Ma Yin and Wu Mu, kings of Chu in the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms, became late bloomers at the age of 75, even bigger than Charlie.

7. Charles III, who is lackluster but always popular, is poor not only in folk life, but also in the film and television industry. As a character on the screen, he is not a good person either.

8. If you want to see Charlie on the screen, the most important thing is to watch the third and fourth seasons of "The Crown" played by Josh O'Connor, which is a very powerful movie. Especially in the fourth season, Josh O'Connor won the 78th Golden Globe Award, the 73rd Emmy Award, the 27th screen actors guild awards, 1 1 American Critics' Choice Award and so on for his role as Prince Charles.

Under the interpretation of Josh O'Connor, the third and fourth seasons of The Crown with Charles scenes span from 1964 to 1990, covering many personal events such as Charles' coronation as Prince of Wales and his marriage to Diana. In the meantime, it also witnessed the gradual transformation of Charles from pitiful to hateful, which is also the most successful image of Charles on the screen.

9. As for the Queen in 2006 and Spencer in 20021year, Prince Charles at that time was all portrayed as villains without exception.

In The Queen, the main characters are Queen Elizabeth II (helen mirren) and Prime Minister Blair (Michael Sheehan). There are few shots of Prince Charles (Alex Jennings), but every time he appears, it makes people feel extremely uncomfortable. The film secretly portrays Charles as a villain.

In Spencer, the protagonist is naturally Princess Diana (Kristen Stewart), and then Maggie (sally hawkins), a maid around Diana. Prince Charles (Jack Farthing) also rarely plays. He is an obvious villain and hypocrite, which is very annoying.

10. The above are three major works about the image of Charles, none of which are aboveboard roles and are very unpleasant. Movies and TV are the reflection of reality. Through these films and TV plays, we can see how bad the British used to think of Charles.

1 1. Therefore, the life of Charles III is doomed to be difficult. Not only does he not have the reputation of his mother Elizabeth II, but he also bears a heavy stigma. More importantly, Britain, where Elizabeth II is located, is at least at the first-class level, although it is no longer the world leader. In the future, India will become more and more developed. In 30 years' time, the world will be an era in which the United States, China and India are the three pillars. Japan, Germany, Britain and France have all become second-rate countries, which is not good for Charles. Of course, he probably won't last that long, but it's not a good thing to leave it to the succeeding king as a legacy.

On the other hand, Charles, who has a bad reputation, is a perfect match for the declining British Empire. What era, what kind of king. Judging from this role, Charles is just right.