Information sharing between Lianshanyi and Guizang can be supplemented.

First of all, these three changes are explicitly mentioned in historical classics, including the new theories of Zhou Li and Huan Zi. If we can compare and read all the works, it is not difficult to find that the version mentioned by Zhou Li is different from that mentioned by the new theory, and Zhou Li appeared more than 300 years earlier than the new theory. Zhou Li's Trinity probably has no words, and the Trinity Edition of New Theory explicitly mentions the number of words. Zhou Li didn't mention any writing system to Sanyi, but focused on eight diagrams and sixty-four hexagrams. The three easy versions mentioned in New Theory did not mention any information about the number of hexagrams, but only the number of sentences and the place where they were collected. This is the first thing to study.

Secondly, The Rites of Zhou made it very clear that Da Bu mastered the methods of Lian Shan, Gui Zang and Zhou Yi. His classics are all Eight Classics and Sixty-four Classics, which is the only academic clue left by The Rites of Zhou. What does "all" mean? Each has its own. They all have eight classics, that is, each of the three schools has eight classics and each has sixty-four hexagrams, which is the core skeleton of the three meanings of Zhou Li's edition.

To identify the authenticity of the "Three Meanings" system, we should judge it strictly according to the academic clues mentioned by Zhou Li.

Therefore, whether it is the so-called ancestral or re-promotion, we just need to see if they have solved the logical problems of three sets of gossip and three sets of sixty-four hexagrams. If so, it is worth further study; If not, it is all pseudo-academic and pseudo-inheritance.