Debate whether to cry on the BMW or laugh on the bike.

The students rehearsed before the game.

On the evening of 25th, Guanghua College of Changchun University held the final of the "Chunhua Cup" debate. The positive statement is: crying in a BMW is happier than laughing on a bicycle; The opposite view is that laughing on a bike is happier than crying in a BMW. Although the active students cleverly avoided the materialistic love theory and suggested that sitting in a BMW is a cry of joy after success, not because they are unhappy, they still lost. Because-"We all believe in love after 90."

A new explanation of Mano theory;

Crying is crying with joy after success.

"This is an indisputable answer." For this statement, not only the opposing students of the School of Electrical Information, but also the active students of the School of Journalism and Communication are not controversial. "Students in our school believe in love and disapprove of putting material things above love," said Wang Ying, a teacher of the Youth League Committee.

The pros and cons of the debate are decided by drawing lots. At the beginning of the game, a burst of warm applause came and the curtain gradually opened. The college students wearing blue professional clothes appeared in front of their classmates with a serious expression.

"Crying is tears of joy. It was two people who worked together and finally got a BMW. Crying does not mean unhappiness, and laughing does not mean happiness. " When the theorist put forward this theme, the anti-theorist Li had to admit that "they cleverly avoided the materialism." The next classmate watching the game breathed a sigh of relief. "Mano's distorted theory finally has a new solution."

There is no doubt that the outcome of the debate is that the opposing side won. "It must be happier to sit on a bicycle and laugh happily." A classmate said that before the game started, the outcome was decided.

Students' views on love;

Material defeat to love is the truth.

Yesterday, the reporter discussed the concept of love with four debaters from the opposing side. Four students have been protesting and denying the view that "material is supreme and money is the first". Li said: "Putting material above love is an argument between fallacy and truth, which is meaningless and unnecessary. Material is bound to be defeated by love. "

He Gong, a three-time debater, has a girlfriend and is a college classmate. They will eat, study and chat together. "I can't give her anything, but spiritually, we have paid a lot to each other and we are very happy." Song Ao of the fourth debate said that he wanted to find such a person, fall in love and work together, from nothing to driving her around in a BMW. "I believe in the end."

In the second debate, Max Zhang pointed out that the Mano-style concept of love would disappear sooner or later. "We all believe in love after 90." Zhang Jin said that with the improvement of material conditions, people's requirements for material will gradually decline. "People will pay more and more attention to spiritual love and will not fall in love and get married in order to live a good life." Zhang Jin's point of view has been endorsed by many students.

The teacher has something to say:

Shallow love view, don't enter the campus.

According to Mr. Wang Ying, the students' debates were conducted by teachers, but the manuscript teachers of the whole debate contest did not participate in or guide them. "These children think that material things are not everything." Teacher Wang said that people who ask about houses and cars in society should learn from these children and hope that those materialistic love theories will not be passed on to the post-90s generation. (Reporter Sun Shengying/Report)

City evening news