Why can't primitive "art" be called art?

Primitive art is blunt, naive, sensitive and wild, not only because the primitive value relationship is usually low-level, shallow, simple, direct and instinctive, but also because people's cognitive ability was very limited at that time, and they could only use shallow, simple, direct and mechanical art forms to reflect and describe the objective things around them.

We define "art" as a passionate and energetic work created by human beings with the help of special materials and tools, using certain aesthetic ability and skills, and under the interaction of spirit and material, mind and aesthetic object. It can be said that it is a creative act of spiritual culture and an organic combination of human ideology and production forms.

It can be seen that primitive art cannot be called art.