Is there any basis for constellation theory?

I think constellation lovers only like to mention the sun constellation, but not the rise and fall of zenith, skyline and four houses. Because the earth rotates much faster than itself, it is still inaccurate to only consider the date of birth and ignore the specific time of birth and the latitude and longitude of the place of birth. "I saw everyone's answer.

Some people say: "The online analysis is unreliable, but astrology is right. As mentioned in the last paragraph, astrology is also full of loopholes. =20 150 1 15 revised answer: some injection sentences were deleted. For my comments, mention me in your answer, mention me in other answers, and those who believe me, I just hope you can add the following, otherwise there is no point in continuing the discussion: you say astrology is not pseudoscience.

"Then can you write it down? What kind of astrology does it belong to? " What does it learn? What kind of problems have been solved? What scientific method does it have? What are academic authority and classics? Some of you say that cheap constellation analysis on the Internet has nothing to do with astrology/astrology is not a prediction of human destiny/astrology is not used to predict the future, and so on. But please tell me, since we have drawn a clear line with the familiar constellation theory, can you tell me what is real pure astrology? "You said that the study of astrology is far more than the sun sign, and the factors considered are far more than the simple date of birth.

Can you tell me what this includes? You can't list, even give one or two examples, one or two aspects that ordinary people can't think of. Finally, three things: first, we assume that astrology is a natural science, so it should at least partially solve the influence of the astrolabe on people's character or destiny in the process of why (why) or how (influence mechanism or action chain). How do I view all the answers to this question and repeat this proposition in different ways?

Secondly, if astrology is really a science, then it should be able to help people sum up (or it has, is it) some laws? What is the law? The law does not say that XX will be realized in the case of one, two, 100,000 or 10,000 XX, but that XX will be realized in the case of "all", right?

For example, you can find out that someone is Aquarius and how well he fits the prediction of the astrolabe. This does not mean that astrology is a science, because if I find a counterexample, it is not a rule. If I find a counterexample, you say that astrology can only partially predict or reflect a person's personality, that is, tell me, what is the key factor that determines the final result? "Just take out the above words and put forward the corresponding chestnut mathematics. Now you announce that you have found a rule: the sum of squares of one side of a triangle is equal to the square of the third side. With it, you draw two triangles, one has three sides, four and five, the other three are 5, 12, 13, and so on.