A question about history

Qin Shihuang (Zulong) thought that people without culture could not rebel by burning books to bury Confucianism. Unexpectedly, the people (east of Yaoshan and Huashan) rebelled before the heat of burning books was exhausted, and it was precisely Liu Bang and Xiang Yu who had never read books who finally destroyed Qin!

It can be seen that the author's original intention is to satirize ignorant policies and cultural absolutism!

On the one hand, it makes sense. Burning books and burying Confucianism is a manifestation of the tyranny of the first emperor, aiming at imprisoning people's thoughts and ensuring the future of Daqin. Liu Xiang uprising is to resist tyranny; Contrary to the original intention, "burning books" was to protect "imperial industry", but the result accelerated the demise of the Qin Dynasty. It can be seen that the author saw the essence.

It doesn't make sense. Although Liu Bang and Xiang Yu did not read much, history was not decided by one or two people. Only the most ordinary people in Qian Qian are historical reformers. The number of Liu Bang and Xiang Yu studying has nothing to do with the demise of Qin!