Which version is good?

Question 1: Which is better, Shanghai ancient books or Notes on Shangshu by Zhonghua Book Company? It should be more professional.

Question 2: I want to buy a copy of Shangshu, but I don't know which version is the most authentic. As long as the history is printed on the paper, why is it not an original?

It's good to find something from thousands of years ago. I suggest you search it and copy it word for word. Now no matter what publishing house publishes it, it doesn't give the author of Shangshu a penny. Why did you give them money?

Question 3: How is Shangshu translated and annotated? People have always had doubts about da Mo Yu. Linguistically, this article is out of date. Mr. Gu Jiegang believes that the concept of five elements put forward in this paper is owned by the Warring States, and the so-called six-nation government is just five elements plus agriculture. Later, Yan Yuan also took "Six Houses and Three Things" as the secret of his school, although his student Li Yi already knew that it was unreliable in the south. The key to Qing people's hatred of "The History of Ancient Literature" lies not in the six governments and three things, but in Zhu Cheng's view that "the human heart is only in danger, and the Taoist heart is only subtle, but exquisite. As long as Qing scholars falsify this article, they can overthrow Zhu Cheng's academic foundation. At present, there are always some scholars who try to explain the academic fallacies in the past two thousand years through other cheats. The ethos probably originated from the scholars in the Qing Dynasty. Since Yan Ruoqu can falsify the history of ancient Chinese prose, Kang Youwei can call all the ancient Chinese classics new forgeries. Of course, it is not impossible for Qian and Gu Jiegang to directly attack all the ancient Chinese classics today. However, we should have a clear logic, that is to say, people have been blind for two thousand years, and it is up to the Qing Dynasty and scholars of the Republic of China to know what is true and what is false. It is no wonder that Liang Qichao, Hu Shi and others equate Qing dynasty scholarship with the Enlightenment. The reason is that the Qing people dare to doubt the classics and the past and dare to oppose the tradition. Why can't this style of study inspire the radicalism of the May 4th Movement? We can see that those who are skeptical about ancient times, their research dates back to the Qing Dynasty, and wrote a lot of articles praising the Qing Dynasty. The reason is the Qing dynasty's suspicion of classics and antiquity. Modern intellectuals can certainly regard it as the Enlightenment, but we must say that it is an advanced form of anti-Manchu revolution, which uses textual research to resist the rule of Manchu and the rebellion of literati. If doubt about classics and antiquity is still a hidden form of resisting Qing dynasty, then the purpose of doubt about classics and antiquity since the Republic of China is very suspicious. After the May 4th Movement, the main way of anti-tradition was the textual research advocated by Hu Shi, but it was overthrown by the Qing Dynasty. Is there anything you can't say directly, and you have to hide your political views through poor classics? As the political ideology of traditional society, didn't Confucian classics lose their political legitimacy in the Republic of China? Why are people including Hu Shi, Gu Jiegang and Fu Sinian hostile and critical to traditional culture? Today, we have long lost the leading role of Confucian classics in political ideology, and people no longer need imperial examinations. Why do some people criticize or scoff at Confucian classics? According to Freud's psychology, the more you can't get it, the more you show some jealousy. Modern intellectuals are unpopular in modern times because they give up traditional virtues. Although they claimed to be like Socrates, like the gadfly of the city-state, what they did was nothing more than corrupting the virtue of the youth, introducing new gods (gentlemen) from abroad, and acting against the customers. They not only drove the host out of the university, but also dug the grave of Confucius, which made Li stiff-see the so-called founder of the city-state. If it weren't for the criticism of Confucianism in those days, who hasn't criticized Confucianism? Anyway, Hu Shi, Fu Sinian and Guo Moruo are all masters of Chinese studies, so anything is possible. For a long time, I mainly want to explain that Da Mo Yu is still a document worthy of attention. This article has been at least 1,700 years since the Eastern Jin Dynasty, and the explanations of Mo Yu in previous dynasties are also overwhelming. Even if it is falsified once, it cannot explain the role played by this article in history. Let's go back to the text and see what this "Great Mo Yu" really said and why it has so much influence in history. If there is no doubt about the death of Yao Shun, then the relationship between Yu Shun and Yu Xia in Great Mo Yu is very intriguing. This novel can be divided into four parts. The first part, as the focus of the full text, emphasizes how the monarch gains the trust of the people. What Yu Shun Boyi said is to keep the monarch's virtue, and it is ok to know people and be good at their duties. On the other hand, Yu Xia put forward the responsibility of six policies and three things as a monarch. The second part is that Yu Shun, like Tang Yao, raised the issue of inheritance. Yu Xia expressed humility and recommended Hao Tao. Then came Yu Shun's praise of Hao Tao, and Hao Tao immediately became modest, believing that rewards and punishments were the duty of the monarch. And that this is an effective performance of Yu Shun's governance. In the third part, it is very abrupt that Yu Shun ceded the throne to Yu Xia in return for his contribution to flood control. Then he said a lot about the virtues of the monarch. Yu Xia has repeatedly refused ... >>

Question 4: What are the translation annotation series of China's classic works? Zhouyi annotation

Interpretation of The Analects of Confucius

Mencius' annotation

Lao Zi's Annotation Translation and Comments on Zhuangzi's Annotation Translation.

Modern Translation of Wen Xin Diao Long

Interpretation of filial piety

Chunqiuzuo Zhuan Zhu

Biography of the Spring and Autumn Ram and its Translation Notes

Interpretation of The Book of Rites

Shangshu explained

Sun Tzu's translation

On Sun Tzu's Art of War

Translation of Zuo Zhuan

Interpretation of The Book of Songs

Interpretation of Gongsun Zilong

Interpretation of Mohist classics

Question 5: Recommend a better version of Thirteen Classics, which looks too eye-catching upstairs.

You can only collect references.

recommend

Notes on Thirteen Classics (fluent punctuation)

Authors: thirteen classics annotation finishing Committee.

Subtitles: Er Ya Zhu, Xiao Jing Zhu, Analects of Confucius Zhu, Chunqiu Gu Liang Zhu, Chunqiu Gongyang Zhu, Chunqiu Zuozhuan Justice, Book of Rites Justice, Book of Rites Annotation, Zhou Li Annotation, Shangshu Justice and Zhouyi Justice.

ISBN: 978730 1026236

Publishing House: Peking University Publishing House

Binding: paperback

Year of publication: 1999- 12- 1

Notes on thirteen classics

ISBN: 978730 1047248

Pages: 12700 pages

Pricing: 2980.00.

Publishing House: Peking University Publishing House

Binding: hardcover

Year of publication: 2000- 12-0 1

Notes on Thirteen Classics (fifteen volumes)

Authors: translated by Cheng Junying and Huang Shouqi.

ISBN: 9787532538 17 1

Pages: all 15 volumes

Pricing: 5 19

Publishing House: Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House

Series: A series of translations and annotations of the Thirteen Classics.

Binding: boxed

Year of publication: July 2009-1

Notes on Thirteen Classics (Qing Jiaqing Edition)

Author: [Qing] Ruan Yuan proofreading

ISBN: 9787 10 1068443

Pages: 6 176 pages

Pricing: 980.

Press: Zhonghua Book Company

Binding: hardcover

Publication year: 2009

Question 6: There are several versions of Yan Jiaxun. Which publishing house is better and the translation is better, please recommend it. Thank you. China has a long history. Scholars in past dynasties wrote countless precious classics, but many of them have been lost due to war and various reasons. In order to preserve the essence of cultural relics, Emperor Qianlong of the Qing Dynasty ordered the collection of suicide notes of the previous generation and the works of scholars of this dynasty, and set up a library to compile Four Treasures of the Study. It took more than ten years to complete. Sikuquanshu contains more than 3480 books. Its collection is large in scale, involves a wide range and takes a long time to edit. It is one of the important references for studying China culture. It is considered as a treasure of China culture. Four sets of Sikuquanshu were originally copied, and then three sets were added, namely Wen Yuan Pavilion, Wen Yuan Pavilion and Wensui Pavilion. Nearly 4000 copywriters. Later, due to the war, most books were lost and damaged. There are only three sets of Wen Yuan Pavilion, Jinwen Pavilion and Wenshui Pavilion, and the remains of Wen Lan Pavilion. Sikuquanshu is divided into four parts: Jing, Shi, Zi and Ji, which belong to forty-four categories and seventy genera. Its content covers a wide range, including philosophy, history, literature and politics. It is an important document for studying China's 5,000-year history and culture, including many famous classic works, such as The Analects of Confucius, Spring and Autumn Annals, Historical Records, Zi Tongzhi Jian, Sun Tzu's Art of War, Compendium of Materia Medica, Tao Yuanming's Collection, Wen Xin Diao Long and so on. Si Ku Quan Shu written by Wen is the most complete and unified work in China's cultural field at present. It systematically and methodically compiles China's 5,000-year-old important classics into a large encyclopedia series. Because of its rich collection of books and numerous documents, it is actually a large database. The Thirteen Classics of Sikuquanshu (Introduction), Zhouyi Shangshu, The Book of Songs, Zhou, Yi Li, Zuo Zhuan, The Biography of the Ram, Gu Liang Zhuan, The Analects of Confucius, The Book of Filial Piety, Er Ya, Mencius and Li Ji were all collected in the Spring and Autumn Period. Dai Shi Department records twenty-five historical records Hou San Guo Zhi Shu Nan Liang Shu Chen Shuwei Shu Bei Shu Qi Shu Nan Shi Bei. History Old Tang Book New Tang Book Old Five Dynasties History New Five Dynasties History Song History Liao History Jin History Yuan History Ming History Draft Other sons built a successor to build a Warring States policy Zhenguan politician Yi Gu Lienv biography Xu Xiake's travels in the Western Regions of Tang Dynasty, Jingchu times, Tang Caizi biography of Dongguan Han Dynasty and before and after the Han Dynasty, Huayang National Records Luoyang Galand recorded Tang Fa "Wu Yue Chun Qiu Yue Shu, Bamboo Book, Seven Books, War Book, War Book, Sun Tzu's Art of War, Woods, Liu Tao. Old title: Jiang Shang [Note] Tian He [Note] Old title: Huang Shigong [Note] Wei Kuang Ruan Yi [Note] Other Art of War written by Sun Bin: Sun Bin's Hundred Wars: Liu Ji's Grasping the Strange Classic: Guiguzi after the Wind: Wang Xu's Old Title: Preparation: Where to Go written by Jiang Yuan. And the author of the book is the stereotyped grandson of Bamboo Slips: Cao Cao's military silence is too white and quiet: Li Zhi's military system in previous dynasties: Chen Fuliang Su Shu's Beilun, Gan Kun's Notes on Mozi's City Defense, Zeng Hu's quotations and other sub-writings, such as Taiping Guangji, Confucius' family language, Han Feizi's Mozi's son, Zhuangzi Xunzi, Sun Zi, Ghosts and Millers' Postscript, Zhou Yi participated in the collation of Shan Hai Jing, returned to the fields, recorded art and collected Mu Chuan Tang. Record Yan Jiaxun's Ancient Paintings Shen Jian's Theory of Balance, Yuan Xinyu Xuan Shi's Nine Chapters of Wisdom and Arithmetic, Lu Shichun's Qiu Shi's Talking about New Ideas, Huangdi's Neijing Ling, Shu Jing Su Wenbei's Urgent Need for Money, and Fang Yao's Treatise on Febrile Diseases, Notes on the Synopsis of the Golden Chamber, Notes on Difficult Classics, Shennong's Herbal Classics, Tea Classics, Embracing Puzi's Internal Articles, Expressing Meaning, Sparing Vulgarity and General Meaning, and I'm Guan Zi, Kong Congzi, Qi

Question 7: There are several versions of Zhouyi translated by Zhonghua Book Company in China's classic translation series.

Interpretation of The Analects of Confucius

Mencius' annotation

Lao Zi's Annotations, Translation and Comments

Zhuangzi's interpretation and translation.

Modern Translation of Wen Xin Diao Long

Interpretation of filial piety

Chunqiuzuo Zhuan Zhu

Biography of the Spring and Autumn Ram and its Translation Notes

Interpretation of The Book of Rites

Shangshu explained

Sun Tzu's translation

On Sun Tzu's Art of War

Translation of Zuo Zhuan

Interpretation of The Book of Songs

Interpretation of Gongsun Zilong

The Classification and Translation of Mohist Classics

Question 8: Seek the authoritative version of the Four Books and Five Classics. It would be best if Sishu could understand Zhu's annotations. After all, it is a unique note. The Doctrine of the Mean is the most difficult of the four books, so you can leave it alone for a while. In The Doctrine of the Mean, the words "Destiny is nature, truth is truth, cultivation is teaching" are too far away from the life of modern people. However, for at least a thousand years, Confucian scholars in China have always believed in the ideals of "learning" and "courage". The annotations of Lun Heng and Meng have the following options:

The Analects of Confucius:

Perhaps the most popular annotation in the market is Yang Bojun's Annotation on the Analects of Confucius. The advantage of this book is that it is short and pithy, without any nonsense, and its handling of text annotations is very accurate, which deserves everyone's attention. However, I really don't recommend this notebook. The reason is that he didn't give full play to the wonderful features of The Analects. Yang Bojun made a wonderful comment on Zuo Zhuan in the way of a park scholar, but it was a bit like buying a gift to return pearls to The Analects. My feeling is that although the content of this book does not seem to be influenced by the conscious mentality during the Cultural Revolution, the so-called "not talking about righteousness" is actually a helpless work deeply branded by the times, because it does not provide any inspiration for beginners.

I recommend four versions of annotations: Zhu's Collection of Notes, Qian Mu's New Interpretation of the Analects of Confucius, Shu Zheng's Shu Zheng, and Hai Baonan's Justice of the Analects of Confucius. The Analects of Justice may be too long to read for the time being. However, I suggest reading Zhu's and Qian Muhe's books together. Zhu Qian is talking about righteousness, and The Analects of Confucius is proved by facts. Reading together can help us understand the way of "being a saint inside and being a king outside".

Mencius:

Compared with The Analects of Confucius, Yang Bojun's Notes on Mencius is good. The reason is that Mencius mostly said what he should say, unlike Confucius, which was more subtle and obscure. So just pay attention to the words, there is no big problem. Of course, reading together is better than Zhu's Collection of Notes. Then, if you have free time, you can read Jiao Xun's Justice of Mencius and Dai Zhen's Explanation of Mencius' Word Meaning.

The Five Classics is really not suitable for beginners to dabble in. Even after the prosperity of Pu Xue in Qing Dynasty, there are still a lot of unsolved problems in the Five Classics. The short book (Book of Changes) reads like a gobbledygook, while the long book (Rites and the Spring and Autumn Period) makes people feel boring from time to time, and often they don't feel any gains after reading a long paragraph. The Book of Songs may be the most suitable for beginners to read, but I'm afraid it's difficult to read through 300 articles. When Dai Zhen 13 years old, he read the annotations of Thirteen Classics, which is unimaginable. For modern people, only read slowly, take more notes and take good notes.

First of all, the annotations of the Thirteen Classics must be chewed. Modern annotations are sometimes not published by the ancients, but they only add bricks to the building annotated by the Thirteen Classics. The excellent notes of modern people are recommended as follows:

1. The Book of Changes: Notes on Zhouyi by Huang Shouqi and Zhang Shanwen, Complete Interpretation of Zhouyi by Jin and Lv Shaogang, and New Notes on Zhouyi by Xu Zhirui.

2. Book: On the Interpretation and Translation of Shangshu School by Gu Jiegang and Liu Qiwei.

3. Poetry: Cheng Junying's annotation and analysis of The Book of Songs, and Chen Zizhan's direct interpretation of The Book of Songs.

4. Zuo Zhuan: Yang Bojun's Notes on Zuo Zhuan in the Spring and Autumn Period, A Study of Zuo Zhuan in the Spring and Autumn Period, and A List of Important Events in the Spring and Autumn Period.

5. Gift: The content is complicated, and good notes are all works of the Qing Dynasty. There are not many annotation books for modern people. Yang Tianyu is the author of Zhou Li Zhu, Li Ji Zhu and Zhou Li Zhu.

I study Chinese, most of which are books of our major. It is worth seeing.

Question 9: According to the bamboo slips of Tsinghua, the ancient prose Shangshu is a fake book, so what is the value of the popular Shangshu now? The conclusion that the ancient prose Shangshu is a fake book has a long history, which was considered untenable according to textual research before the discovery of bamboo slips. The so-called falsehood is just a matter of the times claimed in this book. But the book was written by the ancients after all, and it also bears the imprint of the times of the compilers. From today's point of view, it certainly contains rich historical value. For an inappropriate example, there are many fake cultural relics now, which should be from the Tang and Song Dynasties. However, if you look back at these fakes after 1000 years, they will certainly be cultural relics, provided that they can be preserved, although they may be worthless today. After 1000 years, people can analyze the manufacturing level and so on according to these fakes. Therefore, truth is always relative.

As for whether it makes sense, how do you say this? It's no use if you don't read him.